monsieurzouzou
Published on 08/10/06 at 03:24
Best value:
Excellent
Also the rack djm500/600 ke ...
4 channels + 1 microphone, a copy of the DJM500 as this level lbr /> This is not a good sr achte that table but is very Aesthetics s nice (gray enough class), the aa MRIT to be signalbr />
INTERESTED some effects but nothing to do with Pioneer: some effects are unnecessary, the flanger is coarse, the filter and pitch shift are not bad, however, Russian
UTILIZATION
The manual is still in blister, y 'no need fawn head and he leaves three of thumb
for Access in functions and config gnrale, the t trs also a pioneer copied many easy to use, flexibility claret. Good history to compare (yet) and to a review I would say that the knobs of qualo less ergonomic, but frankly c criticism for fun because k'ils trs are good anyway: p
on the other hand, I am of the same opinion as the other posters, the faders are terrible: trs flexible race Settings, Reverse, really excellent. The cross fader is also Settings, assignable steals on each channel (at the same time, I find as a normal option) and a cut high / medium / low for each channel, not bad
After a few years, always no complaints about ergonomics, but I must admit that I do not use a lot of options such as reverse some of the knobs
SOUNDS
Trs little breath, qualiseurs effective at the cut (-26dB c not bad at all) would have more if they went up t 26 dB in the other direction, to the old vinyl can serve as a, o the 9 / 10
ars 3 years of use: knobs always as efficient and flexible, not the wrong, however attention to the buttons of the cross fader assignment: it may take the dusts and ill let the sound (sputum) but a little cleaning and leaves without a problem
the headphone volume is much tropdpendant assign the gain / channel (s) that will cost you, so its derrire dpendemment of Systm, if the gain is low on n ' means nothing in the headphones.
OVERALL OPINION
I come to the view that day I left 3 years ago, so APRS three years of using non-intensive (an evening once in a while):
the -:
the button effects became erratic: you have to press hard to make it work
the buttons of the cross fader is assigned to monitor whether it takes the dusts avoid (at the same time I ever opened the table to clean it)
the headphone volume too dpendant gain
Most:
table still functional: no loss of sound, knobs always flexible and effective. No customer service at the moment
aspect always clean: not clear graduations, buttons always stable and rights (except the effects, as nuncio above)
I use basic animation and it suits me as always.
With exprience, I would do this choice because it is an excellent qualitprix, when looking for a balance between behringer DJX (eurk) and Pioneer DJM (a classic).
4 channels + 1 microphone, a copy of the DJM500 as this level lbr /> This is not a good sr achte that table but is very Aesthetics s nice (gray enough class), the aa MRIT to be signalbr />
INTERESTED some effects but nothing to do with Pioneer: some effects are unnecessary, the flanger is coarse, the filter and pitch shift are not bad, however, Russian
UTILIZATION
The manual is still in blister, y 'no need fawn head and he leaves three of thumb
for Access in functions and config gnrale, the t trs also a pioneer copied many easy to use, flexibility claret. Good history to compare (yet) and to a review I would say that the knobs of qualo less ergonomic, but frankly c criticism for fun because k'ils trs are good anyway: p
on the other hand, I am of the same opinion as the other posters, the faders are terrible: trs flexible race Settings, Reverse, really excellent. The cross fader is also Settings, assignable steals on each channel (at the same time, I find as a normal option) and a cut high / medium / low for each channel, not bad
After a few years, always no complaints about ergonomics, but I must admit that I do not use a lot of options such as reverse some of the knobs
SOUNDS
Trs little breath, qualiseurs effective at the cut (-26dB c not bad at all) would have more if they went up t 26 dB in the other direction, to the old vinyl can serve as a, o the 9 / 10
ars 3 years of use: knobs always as efficient and flexible, not the wrong, however attention to the buttons of the cross fader assignment: it may take the dusts and ill let the sound (sputum) but a little cleaning and leaves without a problem
the headphone volume is much tropdpendant assign the gain / channel (s) that will cost you, so its derrire dpendemment of Systm, if the gain is low on n ' means nothing in the headphones.
OVERALL OPINION
I come to the view that day I left 3 years ago, so APRS three years of using non-intensive (an evening once in a while):
the -:
the button effects became erratic: you have to press hard to make it work
the buttons of the cross fader is assigned to monitor whether it takes the dusts avoid (at the same time I ever opened the table to clean it)
the headphone volume too dpendant gain
Most:
table still functional: no loss of sound, knobs always flexible and effective. No customer service at the moment
aspect always clean: not clear graduations, buttons always stable and rights (except the effects, as nuncio above)
I use basic animation and it suits me as always.
With exprience, I would do this choice because it is an excellent qualitprix, when looking for a balance between behringer DJX (eurk) and Pioneer DJM (a classic).