Blue Sky Exo2

What characteristics have motivated your choice?
Personally, this is value for money, a monitoring system with two satellites and sub not worth € 400 elsewhere. As the first system monitoring I am completely satisfied.

For what purpose? What amp / What configuration? ...
Used with a m-audio 1010LT (internal sound card) connected to a pc rca upscale. Level connection nothing wrong with a pre-amp that can set the sub gain + gain. Button behind the box, and of course they are amplified.

SOUNDS

The frequency curve is sufficiently neutral?
Yes, notice of amateur not too bad ear.

The dynamics are respected?
Frankly we can all mounted more than 50%, which is already huge for just mixed or compound in computer music, but they stumble. Above 50% and there are quite a few sizzling distortion but very light. And I would not put more than 75% of my vitality hearing. But the dynamic is impeccable.

The sound is clear and precise across the spectrum?
Impeccable above 50/60 Hz when you want to do modeling and worked the bass below that spoils, but they are like the sound of the sub too loud slap and when it is a little messed up rendering over some distortion, but at the same time faillais expect.

The stereo image is good?
So if we talk about here is niquel spatialization.

But I defer a point on the phase shift with respect to or placed his ear. Compared to comment on the former model 2.1 I think it was well corrected, but beware there is still the weak point of the model with a phase shift which feels good.

OVERALL OPINION

I use it for 6 semmaines value for money is great.

Bémole is the need to be careful in Ableton Live is that the sampling frequency is set correctly, it took me a while to disappear painful sizzling very strong and pronounced as live. But hey this is a problem that software was perhaps the m-audio too.

If I had to put the speakers in the same price I would do this purchase eyes closed. But I think if we really want to be very sharp especially in the sub-bass is better to take superior quality.

The next 2.1 with subwoofer fermé.Je'm using it as listening por mix with dj controller.

SOUNDS

Well I'm not sharp enough to talk about the frequency curve, but in any case I can say that they are not flateuses and the spectrum is very broad and rather clear and precise with a surprising ability to feel all sounds even in overload sons.Le box is a surprising bass is very frustrating to see even the beginning but once accustomed ear it appears to be the strong point of the system because it was interesting enough pressure whatsoever to low volume and still more high volume without the surflatté bas.En this qi for the top spectrum is cardboard at first but that feeling fades after an hour to become agréable.Peut rather be with time it will fade or they need to warm up before speaking

OVERALL OPINION

I have since 2 weeks and this is what I really wanted to maison.Je can mix making me happy without being obliged to put the sound too loud, even my neighbors told me that the sound is much weaker whereas before I had a 2.1 altec lansing subwoofer with a 16 w and pleasure beyond measure.
Well I can not do much comparison because ten years ago I had 10 ns, but I was mixing on vinyl and I had a Freevox, not really comparable.J 'ais heard some KRKrp6 both because this is I wanted to take départet I confess that I'd like to make a direct comparison.
I was able to push down a few hours and then I can say that happiness, nothing has budged!
I loveThe most is the closed box bass which allows for good without feeling execive roundness.
the heating time less mids and treble before they are enjoyable.
No comparison, but rather happy with the sound for the price and reliability will side with time