Log in
Log in

or
Create an account

or
EN
FR
Where to buy MT8X?
Less
No retailers are offering this product at this time.
Availability alert
There are no classified ads for this product.
New ad alert
4.3/5
(4 reviews)
5
25 %
(1 review)
4
75 %
(3 reviews)
3
2
1
Write a user reviewAsk for a user review
Users reviews
Sort by
Most recent
  • Most recent
  • Most useful
Sort results
Sort criteria: Most recent
  • Most recent
  • Most useful
  • rouldugrouldug
    Yamaha MT8XPublished on 10/18/14 at 02:46
    (This content has been automatically translated from French)
    I have used it in 1989 to make models to move to 8 digital tracks in 1995.
    I agree with the previous opinions.
    What I liked is the roundness of the preamps that looked a lot warmer than my previous TASCAM 244 sound.
    I'm not too used actually, because I was out of inspiration. I was prolixte with TASCAM.
    I kept it for a day duplicate my tapes on digital (which I have not done for lack of time and energy.
  • fedthofedtho
    Yamaha MT8XPublished on 09/06/03 at 17:50
    (This content has been automatically translated from French)
    I absolutely confirms the positive opinion of manu studio!

    First (and only) multitrack tape for me too. I tonn friends with qulit Sound: 9.5 cm / sec. AND a dbx, was really a diffrence.
    Today (a gives an ide of my money), I used the table to mix into my Audiophile 2496 (and, incidentally, trs fills this mission!).

    I also share the same manu's Reserved, by adding an output level gnral a little weak, which requires pushing Reduces the volume and in part the good work of dbx ...

    But for the price the era, c'tait a deal!

    There was a version 4 inputs (The "MT-1X," if my memory is good ...), no effects sends, and without the display trs cool, while green and red , rtroclair on black…
    Read more
    I absolutely confirms the positive opinion of manu studio!

    First (and only) multitrack tape for me too. I tonn friends with qulit Sound: 9.5 cm / sec. AND a dbx, was really a diffrence.
    Today (a gives an ide of my money), I used the table to mix into my Audiophile 2496 (and, incidentally, trs fills this mission!).

    I also share the same manu's Reserved, by adding an output level gnral a little weak, which requires pushing Reduces the volume and in part the good work of dbx ...

    But for the price the era, c'tait a deal!

    There was a version 4 inputs (The "MT-1X," if my memory is good ...), no effects sends, and without the display trs cool, while green and red , rtroclair on black, even the VU meters taient drawings LEDs ...
    (The TEAC and Tascam taient onreux much, although in a more robust and qualitatively CATEGORY probably not far above)
    See less
  • nicolashotmailnicolashotmail
    Yamaha MT8XPublished on 02/11/05 at 01:45
    (This content has been automatically translated from French)
    I use this multitrack for almost 10 years.
    I find it convenient, simple, effective, flexible, compact.
    J'apprcie particularly the 8-track with two loops and effects qualisation.
    One can only regret that in edit mode, the last 4 tracks have only two bands qualisation but I was never too possible problem.
    I possdait prcedement April 1 runway, which I think is really not a good choice.
    With eight tracks, you can switch on the six tracks remaining two to get an infinite number of tracks casi.
    Trs good audio quality (especially for a device k7).
    Trs qualitprix good value, I do it again though with this choice the evolution of technology it becomes tempting to spend on the PC editin…
    Read more
    I use this multitrack for almost 10 years.
    I find it convenient, simple, effective, flexible, compact.
    J'apprcie particularly the 8-track with two loops and effects qualisation.
    One can only regret that in edit mode, the last 4 tracks have only two bands qualisation but I was never too possible problem.
    I possdait prcedement April 1 runway, which I think is really not a good choice.
    With eight tracks, you can switch on the six tracks remaining two to get an infinite number of tracks casi.
    Trs good audio quality (especially for a device k7).
    Trs qualitprix good value, I do it again though with this choice the evolution of technology it becomes tempting to spend on the PC editing software + + big sound card = more possibilities but less easy and more cumbersome.
    See less
  • MoscozicMoscozic

    good stuff but surpassed by the digital

    Yamaha MT8XPublished on 03/12/11 at 01:55
    (This content has been automatically translated from French)
    I used it for 4-5 years, I had the opportunity to use Yamaha and Fostex 4-track analog before it.
    What I liked about this multitrack is that you can use it as a mixing desk because of its features are very comprehensive. I had the opportunity to record live and studio session of music and songs which were published and disseminated.

    Despite this, it remains a cassette tape machine, and do not hesitate to take the ultimate in quality material, otherwise the sound will be rotten.

    If I had a choice again, I would go digital, especially for the studio. For live, if I had more, I will not hesitate to me helping.
Insatisfait(e) des avis ci-dessous ?