Log in
Log in

or
Create an account

or
Add this product to
  • My former gear
  • My current gear
  • My wishlist
Yamaha MT8X
Images
1/115

All user reviews for the Yamaha MT8X

Price engine
Classified Ads
Forums
Not satisfied with those reviews?
Filter
4.3/5
(4 reviews)
25 %
(1 review)
75 %
(3 reviews)
Write a user review
Value For Money : Excellent
Users reviews
  • rouldugrouldug

    Yamaha MT8XPublished on 10/18/14 at 02:46
    (This content has been automatically translated from French)
    I have used it in 1989 to make models to move to 8 digital tracks in 1995.
    I agree with the previous opinions.
    What I liked is the roundness of the preamps that looked a lot warmer than my previous TASCAM 244 sound.
    I'm not too used actually, because I was out of inspiration. I was prolixte with TASCAM.
    I kept it for a day duplicate my tapes on digital (which I have not done for lack of time and energy.
  • fedthofedtho

    Yamaha MT8XPublished on 09/06/03 at 17:50
    (This content has been automatically translated from French)
    I absolutely confirms the positive opinion of manu studio!

    First (and only) multitrack tape for me too. I tonn friends with qulit Sound: 9.5 cm / sec. AND a dbx, was really a diffrence.
    Today (a gives an ide of my money), I used the table to mix into my Audiophile 2496 (and, incidentally, trs fills this mission!).

    I also share the same manu's Reserved, by adding an output level gnral a little weak, which requires pushing Reduces the volume and in part the good work of dbx ...

    But for the price the era, c'tait a deal!

    There was a version 4 inputs (The "MT-1X," if my memory is good ...), no effects sends, and without the display trs cool, while green and red , rtroclair on black…
    Read more
    I absolutely confirms the positive opinion of manu studio!

    First (and only) multitrack tape for me too. I tonn friends with qulit Sound: 9.5 cm / sec. AND a dbx, was really a diffrence.
    Today (a gives an ide of my money), I used the table to mix into my Audiophile 2496 (and, incidentally, trs fills this mission!).

    I also share the same manu's Reserved, by adding an output level gnral a little weak, which requires pushing Reduces the volume and in part the good work of dbx ...

    But for the price the era, c'tait a deal!

    There was a version 4 inputs (The "MT-1X," if my memory is good ...), no effects sends, and without the display trs cool, while green and red , rtroclair on black, even the VU meters taient drawings LEDs ...
    (The TEAC and Tascam taient onreux much, although in a more robust and qualitatively CATEGORY probably not far above)
    See less
  • nicolashotmailnicolashotmail

    Yamaha MT8XPublished on 02/11/05 at 01:45
    (This content has been automatically translated from French)
    I use this multitrack for almost 10 years.
    I find it convenient, simple, effective, flexible, compact.
    J'apprcie particularly the 8-track with two loops and effects qualisation.
    One can only regret that in edit mode, the last 4 tracks have only two bands qualisation but I was never too possible problem.
    I possdait prcedement April 1 runway, which I think is really not a good choice.
    With eight tracks, you can switch on the six tracks remaining two to get an infinite number of tracks casi.
    Trs good audio quality (especially for a device k7).
    Trs qualitprix good value, I do it again though with this choice the evolution of technology it becomes tempting to spend on the PC editin…
    Read more
    I use this multitrack for almost 10 years.
    I find it convenient, simple, effective, flexible, compact.
    J'apprcie particularly the 8-track with two loops and effects qualisation.
    One can only regret that in edit mode, the last 4 tracks have only two bands qualisation but I was never too possible problem.
    I possdait prcedement April 1 runway, which I think is really not a good choice.
    With eight tracks, you can switch on the six tracks remaining two to get an infinite number of tracks casi.
    Trs good audio quality (especially for a device k7).
    Trs qualitprix good value, I do it again though with this choice the evolution of technology it becomes tempting to spend on the PC editing software + + big sound card = more possibilities but less easy and more cumbersome.
    See less
  • MoscozicMoscozic

    good stuff but surpassed by the digital

    Yamaha MT8XPublished on 03/12/11 at 01:55
    (This content has been automatically translated from French)
    I used it for 4-5 years, I had the opportunity to use Yamaha and Fostex 4-track analog before it.
    What I liked about this multitrack is that you can use it as a mixing desk because of its features are very comprehensive. I had the opportunity to record live and studio session of music and songs which were published and disseminated.

    Despite this, it remains a cassette tape machine, and do not hesitate to take the ultimate in quality material, otherwise the sound will be rotten.

    If I had a choice again, I would go digital, especially for the studio. For live, if I had more, I will not hesitate to me helping.