4.3/5(3 reviews)
5
33 %
4
67 %
Users reviews
Pete_shifterPublished on 06/14/05 at 04:22 (This content has been automatically translated from French)Frankly, the price is more than correct.
The default is:
- Look unprofessional (unless a shine or a Custom A AAX)
- The edge is not well done, personally I gave him a little bit of lime to not cut my fingers when handling
- Prevents the bell to ask the square cymable upside down on the foot (to play on the bomb part, which quickly breaks).
By upgrading its cons, it's trashy. Somewhat in the spirit of a trem-AAX 17 "but less rich in recess.00
HellmuthPublished on 03/03/06 at 07:44 (This content has been automatically translated from French)The report final qualitprix is because for 40 vs Chinese have a really trashes a wish! by (!!), against it is ugly and the bell square complike are positioned "upside down" on a foot; personal g pali the problem by tightening a boulond rather than a traditional butterfly, which affects the cymbal, the cymbal is very thin so care must be taken not to play too and not nag too much greenhouse on his foot.00- supercellPublished on 08/20/06 at 07:53 (This content has been automatically translated from French)Cymbals at its exeptional, real china Chinese!
Its much richer in its field a Turkish cymbal, for a price less ten foix.
It may interfere with lovers of clean and formatted, but fans of the ancient Chinese will be happy (for cheap).
The only downside for the portion not well finished, often rough.00
Insatisfait(e) des avis ci-dessous ?
Our members also liked:
