View other reviews for this product:
ricoute « surprising in matters of SOSN and very homogeneous »
Published on 12/28/12 at 13:1461 keys
Connections!
- 1 output / line out via 2 RCA / cinch for external amplification -loading hifi / PA / keyboard amp) bie nplmus convenient than TRADITIONAL 6.35 more orients connection instruments
- 2 shots midi in / out (multi-pin)
- 1 USB jack
- 1 between pedal decision "sustain" 6.35
- 1 between Mic (quite indite in this type of hardware) 6.35 level adjustable ????
- 1 headphone jack 6.35 (tranquilit to play it and not disturb the neighborhood)
After for characteristics see below datasheet:
Number of Keys: 61
Dynamic: 1
Aftertouch: 0
Amplification: 2x8 Watts
Total sonorits: 138
Multi effects: yes
Number of styles: 109
Creation of styles: 0
Song capacity: 30
number of rhythmic introductions: 1
Number of rhythmic purposes: 1
Number of rhythmic variations: 2
Polyphony: 48 notes
Dual mode: yes
Pitch bend: yes
Transposition: yes
Split: yes
Display: LCD bright retro
Squencer: yes
Number of tracks squencer: 1
Between lines: yes 1
Among microphones: yes 1
USB: 1
Headphone jack: Yes 1
Dimensions: 940x370x130 cm
Weight 5.7kg
USE
The soft key is pleasant, no aftertouch / heavy touch as an acoustic piano in this range, but adequate for aps set in the keys
The manual is quite succinct, but the discovery of the device is also instructive
A uydpart is a bit confusing SOSN and rhythms, after you take these rpres especially as the display is quite informative with a gate line and positioning knew the keyboard and the diff rentses functions and effects, so rather complete
PAs e nmidi essay, I guess it must be the usual average for this type of hardware
SONORITS
the sound is clear coat (but much more open compared to a yam psr 175 I possd so good musicality although not absolutely neutral, but at the same time it is therefore more arranger keyboard in sound manipulation, although the piano sounds not at all dmritent
The expression is rather good
The effects are very diversifis and are of good overall homogeneity and traditional exotic sounds may be slightly below, for against the drums are pretty good.
NOTICE GLOBAL
I use it for a week, obviously NOHD pe ude back, but the sound is rather very good, intelligible even low volume, no screaming or aggressive but in a good dynamic gloable
THE R / p / q seems quite managed to and better than among comparable price range casio yamaha and even compared to the KD 100 no better than this one and bcp displaying similarities and ergonomics with a lot more key, lea turning wheel (fawn jog for video editing) of the kd-62 is really a plus to navigate quickly.
So, yes I do it again this choice without question, and it can even compete with arranger keyboards e na more ambitious and more under the foot in a dynamic and noise Roland E-09 completely dgonfl compared to ep -07
Initially, I had rather bad a priori pro-Milonga brand, fianlement I find it more ssuisant with more potential than a yamaha or casio not ultimately trancendants!
Connections!
- 1 output / line out via 2 RCA / cinch for external amplification -loading hifi / PA / keyboard amp) bie nplmus convenient than TRADITIONAL 6.35 more orients connection instruments
- 2 shots midi in / out (multi-pin)
- 1 USB jack
- 1 between pedal decision "sustain" 6.35
- 1 between Mic (quite indite in this type of hardware) 6.35 level adjustable ????
- 1 headphone jack 6.35 (tranquilit to play it and not disturb the neighborhood)
After for characteristics see below datasheet:
Number of Keys: 61
Dynamic: 1
Aftertouch: 0
Amplification: 2x8 Watts
Total sonorits: 138
Multi effects: yes
Number of styles: 109
Creation of styles: 0
Song capacity: 30
number of rhythmic introductions: 1
Number of rhythmic purposes: 1
Number of rhythmic variations: 2
Polyphony: 48 notes
Dual mode: yes
Pitch bend: yes
Transposition: yes
Split: yes
Display: LCD bright retro
Squencer: yes
Number of tracks squencer: 1
Between lines: yes 1
Among microphones: yes 1
USB: 1
Headphone jack: Yes 1
Dimensions: 940x370x130 cm
Weight 5.7kg
USE
The soft key is pleasant, no aftertouch / heavy touch as an acoustic piano in this range, but adequate for aps set in the keys
The manual is quite succinct, but the discovery of the device is also instructive
A uydpart is a bit confusing SOSN and rhythms, after you take these rpres especially as the display is quite informative with a gate line and positioning knew the keyboard and the diff rentses functions and effects, so rather complete
PAs e nmidi essay, I guess it must be the usual average for this type of hardware
SONORITS
the sound is clear coat (but much more open compared to a yam psr 175 I possd so good musicality although not absolutely neutral, but at the same time it is therefore more arranger keyboard in sound manipulation, although the piano sounds not at all dmritent
The expression is rather good
The effects are very diversifis and are of good overall homogeneity and traditional exotic sounds may be slightly below, for against the drums are pretty good.
NOTICE GLOBAL
I use it for a week, obviously NOHD pe ude back, but the sound is rather very good, intelligible even low volume, no screaming or aggressive but in a good dynamic gloable
THE R / p / q seems quite managed to and better than among comparable price range casio yamaha and even compared to the KD 100 no better than this one and bcp displaying similarities and ergonomics with a lot more key, lea turning wheel (fawn jog for video editing) of the kd-62 is really a plus to navigate quickly.
So, yes I do it again this choice without question, and it can even compete with arranger keyboards e na more ambitious and more under the foot in a dynamic and noise Roland E-09 completely dgonfl compared to ep -07
Initially, I had rather bad a priori pro-Milonga brand, fianlement I find it more ssuisant with more potential than a yamaha or casio not ultimately trancendants!