All user reviews for the Pearl D-2000BR

I used this seat for 3 years behind my keyboards.

My choice was motivated by the seriousness of the alleged mark (high end model at the time) and sitting promising comfort.

Nice product, nice finish. I immediately appreciated its comfort and stability. The seat was perfect for me and I quickly found that my back was in much better.

Unfortunately, one night, playing the feet broke! Indeed, the piece alloy tightening the threaded rod broke in half and I found myself in a m ... I do not want anyone. FYI I weighs "only" 80 kilos.

I approached my salesman who could not do anything out of warranty. This is the game, I accept. I contacted PEARL. They told me they were sorry ... and that was unfortunate ... and that's it! Yes, Mr PEARL, you do not have spare parts to offer me? ... I need regular. I do not? Really no solution? ... And then, finished, more response.

How to judge the quality / price? 260 or € 270 for 3 years of use! SAV nonexistent! Serviceable feet but throwing blame proposal "small" a spare! Direction rubbish! Should we consider this material as consumable?

I would do this choice? This seat is no longer sold so ... But what is certain is that I will never command my confidence PEARL who left me "fall" twice, one in the literal sense. That said, the latest models (high-end) are equipped with identical or almost identical piece (seen in store). A word to the wise.

NO, I will not repeat that choice. Too risky! And a little disappointed though.

A very good seat design something original, very thick padding, upholstery épaisse.La Feraille and beautiful quality and the welds are clean.

I opted for a seat for a record that supports me a bit on the lower back during the phases of double pedal. Mission accomplished.

I chose this seat for the form of its record as small as possible, here in the form of taste if you will, just enough to support or must without impeding on the elbows, and then it was not like a beast as some office chair.

Looking back and work on my position the back part is not necessarily essential and ultimately I would have preferred such a beast sitting bike quite thick but it is not cheap either. I prefer the basic position of the seat is reversible donc.C is to say that the part is rounded in front and behind the crack.

The only problem with this seat is transportability, it's heavy and dense and not easy to cram that will not be in the car. For once laid against he does not stumble over, necessarily.
But he deserves the name "throne" or throne in English, it supports many of my big derche lourdeau in all circumstances.

on the other hand is not given this history, it is too expensive for what it is, do not forget that this is a beast seat but in some cases unique services it renders are not negligible. ( So perfect record, two playing positions, large density and thickness).

In conclusion
----- Most: back, seat reversible, robust
----- The least: bulky, inflated price.