pvesco
Published on 11/11/05 at 09:13
Value For Money :
Excellent
Utiliss prestationsde in occasionally for a good over several decades. Neutrality of the sound (not aggressive), dynamic possibilities of using the compressor (good for the speakers when the amp is out of sight). The PCHE on mono subs (one per ct scabies twice 800/900w ...). I used the other brands MODELS diffrent games, even if a bit heavy and on some points Exceeds MODELS by modern there is reliable and effective time. If failed, it is easy rpar; breakdowns as the most bnignes or partial. Breakdowns low noise, almost inaudible as MODEL. Be careful not shuffled sries the "white" and "black" whose polarity is different, or going in to cblerles consquence. Good quality second-hand price today for an amateur who wants a good sound without breaking the bank. Exellent in HIFI and monitoring and research by audiophiles. I would do this choice for A model of the same brand today with confidence (MODL I dja tests) or to the OCAS, plustt than buying a price gal A model of the bottom of game nine. The dmarche as not to break the piggy bank for the unnecessary hardware that is used sometimes as a year, and remain in a sound (it's relative), high-end. Opinion 5 years later I bought two that run from time to time.
Still no worries on the SX300 in interier or 2226G jbl into 4 ohms. The quality is the sound is more enjoyable than Crown Macrotech for example, or QSC RMX. Collection's outdoor classroom or small on the pair of JBL subs, it is largely the road in terms of sound quality and level (about 500w per ct), you just have mfier the clip (the amp much less powerful than the speaker) even at 200. A little tonn performance, I searched the Technical Specifications and the confirmation, they are at present a lot of amps (even at Dynacord) or even supprieures. The only points that are ngatifs to reproach: a certain softness in bridje 8 ohms (I do not use more of that fawn) and a limiter too active (I do not use anymore and I watch more my level). The weight space power is not present trs, the amp is heavy. Its power range is not too pregnant to diffrent quon available commercially in nine so use with prcaution.
The report purchase price / occasional use it is largely positive. My installation (one and two subs PAA990 JBL 2226 Used for 500 euros) buried in terms of quality and reliability at most installations of the same type (this award was that nine of the low-end) .
For now I may keep in a while. A pair of subs deuxime is planned.
Still no worries on the SX300 in interier or 2226G jbl into 4 ohms. The quality is the sound is more enjoyable than Crown Macrotech for example, or QSC RMX. Collection's outdoor classroom or small on the pair of JBL subs, it is largely the road in terms of sound quality and level (about 500w per ct), you just have mfier the clip (the amp much less powerful than the speaker) even at 200. A little tonn performance, I searched the Technical Specifications and the confirmation, they are at present a lot of amps (even at Dynacord) or even supprieures. The only points that are ngatifs to reproach: a certain softness in bridje 8 ohms (I do not use more of that fawn) and a limiter too active (I do not use anymore and I watch more my level). The weight space power is not present trs, the amp is heavy. Its power range is not too pregnant to diffrent quon available commercially in nine so use with prcaution.
The report purchase price / occasional use it is largely positive. My installation (one and two subs PAA990 JBL 2226 Used for 500 euros) buried in terms of quality and reliability at most installations of the same type (this award was that nine of the low-end) .
For now I may keep in a while. A pair of subs deuxime is planned.