MAX2500 classified ad
Alerte nouvelle annonceImages
Reviews
4.6/5(8 reviews)
63 %
38 %
Write a user review
sinfonis
Simply excellent !!!!
Published on 09/09/14 at 08:17 (This content has been automatically translated from French)0 fault!
02
»
thorgen
nice amp, reliable and powerful
Published on 07/01/13 at 15:10 (This content has been automatically translated from French)I have this amp for three or four years, bought used, so it did not ruin me. I use it to push tops Rope B Chiltone CG7-382P (purchased at the same time), only in bars / sound to smaller rooms for groups (although, I rebuke the songs and electronic drums). For larger scenes, I couple the B string with two RCF (I know, it would be better with four identical speakers) and I plus two passive cabinets (2x46 each) driven by a Proline 3000. He does his job, never had a problem. It is powerful enough in all situations (but pregnant are also many), sounds properly, does not heat, is not too heavy. I tried other amps before him, but never very high standard, I am an amateur, and to use that I...…
Read more
I have this amp for three or four years, bought used, so it did not ruin me. I use it to push tops Rope B Chiltone CG7-382P (purchased at the same time), only in bars / sound to smaller rooms for groups (although, I rebuke the songs and electronic drums). For larger scenes, I couple the B string with two RCF (I know, it would be better with four identical speakers) and I plus two passive cabinets (2x46 each) driven by a Proline 3000. He does his job, never had a problem. It is powerful enough in all situations (but pregnant are also many), sounds properly, does not heat, is not too heavy. I tried other amps before him, but never very high standard, I am an amateur, and to use that I have, I'm very happy. If it again, I could take one, or turn to the amps at Thomann also have excellent QP report.
Cons: I do not see
Cons: I do not see
See less
01
»
jt32
Excellent value for money
Published on 08/23/12 at 05:07 (This content has been automatically translated from French)I have two phonic max 2500 for 6 years: RAS
I have 2 versions, the first with the ventilation central facade and the 2nd with the facade redesigned and further back (not the 2500 plus released much later and much cheaper)
after opening 2 amps for cleaning components are identical.
the first to use with sub sub 8ohm stereo mode: the receiver requires a level of sizeable and arrive fast enough to clip. the limiter is doing its job. I pulled in 2 sub 46 650 w rms each (thus amp far too low) ca sounded good but without extraordinary pressure.
since I always used in parallel with these two subs flush either.
2 ° 4 medium acute head 300w. its very clean. nothing to say in this...…
I have 2 versions, the first with the ventilation central facade and the 2nd with the facade redesigned and further back (not the 2500 plus released much later and much cheaper)
after opening 2 amps for cleaning components are identical.
the first to use with sub sub 8ohm stereo mode: the receiver requires a level of sizeable and arrive fast enough to clip. the limiter is doing its job. I pulled in 2 sub 46 650 w rms each (thus amp far too low) ca sounded good but without extraordinary pressure.
since I always used in parallel with these two subs flush either.
2 ° 4 medium acute head 300w. its very clean. nothing to say in this...…
Read more
I have two phonic max 2500 for 6 years: RAS
I have 2 versions, the first with the ventilation central facade and the 2nd with the facade redesigned and further back (not the 2500 plus released much later and much cheaper)
after opening 2 amps for cleaning components are identical.
the first to use with sub sub 8ohm stereo mode: the receiver requires a level of sizeable and arrive fast enough to clip. the limiter is doing its job. I pulled in 2 sub 46 650 w rms each (thus amp far too low) ca sounded good but without extraordinary pressure.
since I always used in parallel with these two subs flush either.
2 ° 4 medium acute head 300w. its very clean. nothing to say in this price range.
In summary for the first 2 version (I do not know the max 2500 plus) it's rib.
I have 2 versions, the first with the ventilation central facade and the 2nd with the facade redesigned and further back (not the 2500 plus released much later and much cheaper)
after opening 2 amps for cleaning components are identical.
the first to use with sub sub 8ohm stereo mode: the receiver requires a level of sizeable and arrive fast enough to clip. the limiter is doing its job. I pulled in 2 sub 46 650 w rms each (thus amp far too low) ca sounded good but without extraordinary pressure.
since I always used in parallel with these two subs flush either.
2 ° 4 medium acute head 300w. its very clean. nothing to say in this price range.
In summary for the first 2 version (I do not know the max 2500 plus) it's rib.
See less
00
»
dj no mix
Published on 05/21/04 at 14:38 (This content has been automatically translated from French)
The -
no handle on the front
bindings back of the amp too soft
Your sensitivity 1.5v input for rated power (about 5 db)
the +
very good value for q / p
Good sound on various style of music
does not heat
good connectivity
quiet fan
does not turn in safety overheat even after several hours with a small clip
no handle on the front
bindings back of the amp too soft
Your sensitivity 1.5v input for rated power (about 5 db)
the +
very good value for q / p
Good sound on various style of music
does not heat
good connectivity
quiet fan
does not turn in safety overheat even after several hours with a small clip
00
»
Tech. sheet
- Manufacturer: Phonic
- Model: MAX2500
- Series: MAX
- Category: Dual-Channel Power Amps
- Added in our database on: 10/18/2002
We have no technical specifications for this product
but your help will be much welcomed
»
Manuals and other files
Other categories in Power Amplifiers
Other names: max 2500, max2500