All user reviews for the Behringer XM8500

Cardioid dynamic microphone, multi-use copy of the SM-58 (at least in look)
Nothing to say good momentum, good heat, good quality sound, solid trs, good resistant to feedback.

I bought this microphone to test what could give a copy of SM-58 30 Euros (in its box mattress if you like!) Trs good surprise for comparing the micro to SM58 (cts from each other, even rglages, under "live") I can assure you that nothing has no point to 4 times more expensive to obtain the Shure.

For the record, it's a pet unless prcis ... but for 30 euros !!!!!!!

OVERALL OPINION

I use it for 2 years in home studio with microphones cents more expensive. It does not meet good Plit Shure, AKG and other Sehnneisser. Report qualitprix for this type of micro unbeatable!

I RPET for live conditions with a chain of quality middle (small entry-level console, sound amplifier or entry-level keyboard), hard to tell the diffrence with a SM58. Put as much of it is snobbery and have fun.

Honntement, if you need more dynamic mics (especially if it is to connect the table top prizes mix) then buy 3 or 4 of these mics instead of a SM-58. You do not regrettrez.

When you have too much tune or to start a group. Better this than the first microphone shure.
With the money you save, buy something other than a Yellow Cable.

(A Shure SM58 is better? Probably yes, in a preamp 2000 euros, not in a mixer 200 euros)

All t dja said ....

Good mic, good rponse in frquence Jusu '14-15 KHz, the low frequency accorche is very much a distance of 8-10 cm and as all the microphones optimum distance of 1-2 cm.

OVERALL OPINION

Currently I use 2 XM8500, the first was offered me there almost a year and the second I am buying it are two different weeks.

While purchasing among other things I try a shure SM58, and compared it is found almost gnral, whether its look, at the level pop / feedback / robustness, the only regret in the XM8500 comparison of the SM58, a punch thrown in less high frequencies> 10 kHz.

His report qualitprix not say I use essentielelment for the movie and karaoke currently no regrets. Note that in such public entertainment, the microphones are not immune from chutte ... So be it's better than a SM58 XM8500 that makes a fall, not c is in the robustness cause is the price ....

If like me you do the animation karaoke spread the XM8500, the ones you see for the first time that 'moo' or 'screaming' into the microphone, or who n'on really no talent for song is not dvaloriser people it's just out of respect of hardware

Cardioid, 30 euros. Multi-purpose ...
I used to do vocals with my band.

OVERALL OPINION

I use it for 2 months. No complaints. It is powerful! It does not feedback easily and that is more significant.
Compared with an SM58, I'll be realistic, it does not sound the same. It is less brilliant but has more fishing (comparsaison made in the studio with professional monitoring system). Compared to the Shure, it has a little bump in the low midrange that some may not love too much, but it depends on the type of voice which is taken up.
Otherwise, to 30 euros, it is really the case. Especially compared to the models of other brands that price. If this is compared to a mirco SM58 when he is 4 times less, is it really a good mic for its price.

Basic dynamic mic ... priori intended to be sung
prices out of competition: 30 euros approx.

OVERALL OPINION

I tried this mic for recording vocals (in jest): ca is not much! (If anything!)
I tried it for acoustic guitar: the same, no miracle but the sound is clean, I think is pretty k'il medium - medium even bass, ca mank DEFINITIONS ds of the treble ...
I actually bought this mic to the snare, the SM 57 was too expensive to use bcp only my snare drum so I bought this one and I'm delighted!
I even want to say to the snare: take that!
it could serve as a singer but not for recording.
that price I do it again this choice without hsiter the behr I say thank you!
my note refers this type of micro-and is justified by its price!

Exact copy of the look in sm58
component level have to disassemble one, nothing good to say it's Submitted Mount foam, clean welds, and many cell ATACHE ....
it's own

OVERALL OPINION

Well I can hear the sound technicians collgues spit on me lol!
but I did not have the budget for the shure that when you want, I took a fleet of three XM8500 and coupled pramp good, and good food, especially good rglages c is cool
parcqu'il have to say something, shure it's better and more forgiving of errors rglages, and placement. with the XM8500 should take the time to place it, make rglages own .... too many people take the mic like a Shure larache a password at Behr NO!
I strongly deprecated parcontre studio, his breath is too large, and the signal and thus treat hard in the studio, but live it's really recommend (good one is when sm58 mm over the foot lol)! in But for beginners as I sound far more than the council that the 58 (because the microphone does not forgive any mistakes)
never use to scratch especially in disto !!!!!
price level change anything
I would do really choice

Micro FOR voice but can be used for other ... (ququn said by others before).
replica of a shure sm58 but much cheaper ... lol

OVERALL OPINION

I used one for about 2 ½ years.
much less expensive than shure, pop audible by non pro ... lol, but does not look bad a few near reglage.beaucoup better than my old seinheiser ...
RAPORT incredible money!
I challenge to find a better or even equivalent for the same price ???????
I used to live in my voice and I also used to sing karaoke customers and it's solid! I have 2 and they are very very often fall down and they have demonstrate any sign of weakness!
I'll buy another as soon as possible!!

- Cardioid microphone for vocals (can quickly be used in sound recording is suitable ca)

OVERALL OPINION

I useful for almost one month
It is relatively neutral certe is not a sm58 but good enough to make it a lot of things without breaking the bank
I took something different:
-Voices (suitable)
-Catches of bass guitar sounds (better now for the low a bit bland for the guitar electric)
-The sound effects (it's not bad I took sopns water lighter stuff like that car and it was not bad if used with stand)

His big pitfalls of is that the sound is picked up everywhere and that's just a strong hand to ask disappointed create noise so you must use it at all costs in a quiet room on one foot without moving .. . and this is one is succeptible to question its use live ...
This is my first micro I trovue for € 30 with stand and cable on thomann very suitable certe I'll have to buy a mieu soon but I needed a microphone very quickly so I ordered ca I honestly regret it even if it is not of great quality.

Very nice already, it is entirely black / entracite iron (heavy)
He inspires confidence, however I took a look under the hood welded c very well thank you Chinese slave children welder

bah hop characteristic vocal microphone

OVERALL OPINION

So I the User for the song and it is very good anyway I do not live in my musiquue and tou can not c like someone in the coffee or I play is going to do "he waa a lack of presence in the grave medium of the frequency spectrum Bienal c 23498Hz obvious "(I told you the reassurance schmilfbrouf) finally if you follow me ...
then I transplant to the User for my delta blues record I find it very well! m'enfin ca me some shit to buy a very expensive microphone that's great for the price I'm really surprised, the base I had not planned to transplanted with my amp but finally so well ...

absolutely brilliant for the money he "deserves" easily double or triple its price in short I am filled