All user reviews for the Image Line Fruity Loops Studio 5 Producer

Quick and easy installation. No incompatibility. Easy setup. English manual.

SUITABILITY/PERFORMANCE

Software trs stable PC Athlon XP 3000 +, 1GB Ram, Ego-sys card Quatafire 610. Same config on a more modest, the software is effective and can greedy. ASIO and DirectSound.

OVERALL OPINION

I use it for several years with still as much fun. Even if the software displays a clear direction electronic music at large, it can be used outside trs well as manages the afternoon and it has a piano roll. The possibilities are standard and well-thought, for a studio or live use.

A not in the CHARACTERISTICS: the drag-and-pos from exlorateur, automation allows you to play on the filters while registering, export wav or mp3 ... Comes with a whole range of VST and DXi plugin (virtual instrument, effects, compressors, egualiseur ,...) high quality. On the other plug-in are optional such as synths Sytrus has DX10 and FM modulation, soundfont player, or the arrival of a video player in version 5.

It only takes a little getting used to all have to master, even if you are not bilingual since the software is still in English, it is intuitive enough to quickly get good rsultats. FL Studio is available in box or by downloading in three versions depending on your purse with diffrent updated free for life. All one has to report qualitprix unbeatable. I do it again this choice with his eyes closed

Installation without problem.
At the Premire opening a box of software config allows all custom settings rgler ncessaires.

SUITABILITY/PERFORMANCE

No problem on my PC: Pentium 4 / 1.3 Ghz / 256 MB RAM / 20 GB HDD

I use Fruity daily since version 2.7 (a must do well 4 years) and I could count the crashes on the fingers of one hand. For me this app is an exceptional stability.

OVERALL OPINION

I have tried many other apps before settling on FL Studio DEFINITIONS: Reason, Rebirth, Orion, Storm, etc.. I find no n'gale Fruity ergonomics and power. Well, it may be just for those who Drout adbut with the hardware because the hardware does not imitate (as Reason and Rebirth), it goes directly to the flexibility that allows the computing and graphical interfaces ... No need to plug false Cables like Reason, no need to laboriously set a playlist (Manir calculator of the 80) Rebirth as in!

In addition, FL Studio is open compltement: VST, DX, Rewire, Buzz ... he eats everything! Powerful tools: audio editor with possibility of Intgr DEFINITIONS loop of points, a sampler with the possibility of ergonomics dconcertante draw a sample without varying the pitch or to vary the pitch without changing the length, synths (3xosc nothing but that does not look, worth its weight in cacahutes!), effects ...
The report was duly qualitprix, especially when we know that the updates are free. You understood, I do not regret purchasing this software.

Installation is completely simple. Setting freelance in an hour, all basic features included.

Then, constantly discovering widgets, but like in a few minutes everything was seized.

SUITABILITY/PERFORMANCE

Parformances quite fabulous. But its far too typical when you do not push the latest plug-ins to their limits ... A piece is fruity reconnat of all, it is sometimes disabling.

Hyper stable. CPU free. But sometimes that m'empchent grsillements annoying to play live, I ds Exceeds two three effects for my soundcard is ASIO, ...

Nice for the combination sampler / sample by a pattenr / live mode, which allows small samples dclancher all goes with the first keyboard matre come.

Never test for MIDI outside the live mode ... But it is a priori quip for every out possible.

OVERALL OPINION

APRS 6 months, I have not done the trick. J'i by falait cons realized that avoid the core samples, we just have all the same sound (cons, do not drop the laisset sampler, right ...).

C'tait my first app. Still my only "all in one." I never use only, and all is well. I definitely Rasht.

Easy installation (option to automatically uninstall the software can recently)
but the updates do not take into account your old setting (once installed it is necessary? On his preferences ... a little heavy from the time!)

So save their preferences!

Otherwise setup and easy to use as good ergonomics' user interface!
Manual available by pressing F1 at the same time the mouse is positioned on the function you want more detail ... COOL!

SUITABILITY/PERFORMANCE

My PC config (PIV 3ghz 512 MB ram ...) and software is strong demand for more and more resources over the major updates (I use it since version 1.4!)
my first PC (P II 350) would be very fair to use all the features of today's soft

But good to know what you want! The software is very efficient and stable, good fit with the hardware sound card (ASIO / REWIRE / ....)

OVERALL OPINION

I'm using fruity since 1997 and I marvel every update or programmer makes us enjoy the new features very useful ... in the current version (v5) capabilities routing / mixing conjugates are incredible especially with plugins automation MIDI (provided)

I had the opportunity to use lots of apps that primarily CUBASE (atari PC and 3.5)
Cakewalk 9, SONAR2 ... even if they are not the same fates use, I would say that in terms of quality / price and ease of use surpasses the lot of fruity are by floor price and capacity
innumerable.
The plugins provided are of very good quality (source: Ultrafunk for sure) and some generators allow Creations original (gnial Granuliser, the Slicer ..)
You can do everything with fruity and a good dose of imagination !!!!!!!

I DO NOT regret my choice!

Aucum installation problem!
Some incompatibility emulator on behalf of ASIO ASIO4ALL morali not work with a card type "ESS LIKE".
It's pretty simple "drag & drop"
The manual is clear and the user community is active trs our answer to the questions!

SUITABILITY/PERFORMANCE

My config: Amd Athlon 2000 + Abit motherboard (VIA chipset hh ... yes it works!) 256MB DDR PC 2100 with a VALUE SBAUDIGY first version (the 2nd is less well! Not AUDIGY II, the second version of 1) a few GB of hard drive space.
It works perfectly, I work 20 tracks with some VST in latency 10ms AC suits me for now!
Performance varies with plugins for CEUs that bump on the bootlegs is the foot.
Trs stable configuration if the problem that I can to meet came from my PC (hardware, then!)

OVERALL OPINION

I have been using 5 / 6 years that I regret is not having Discoveries before!
I love the ergonomics pretty basic MIDI control, my 19 "monitor is impecable to view the tracks.
I like less the cot in real time recording and management of plugins output.
I'm working on ModPlug tracker, I try not rebirth that I found the terrible era (unless one can today because I used the plugin and I APPRI use a can!) Do parlont not the ref. Cubase studio of amateur (as I do not know a note of solfge ... and that ergonomics is not it ... arf .... I have no words for dcrire! )
Trs RAPORT good quality price!
I would do this choice eyes closed!
This software is not doing that to make the "Teak" or drive to the i! I use it to make electro, house, remix or just music mlodique .
Try to adopt it.

Install complete

SUITABILITY/PERFORMANCE

Asus, athlon 2000, 1024
it works perfectly ... BUT I am using fruity since version 3 and I do everything on it (classical music, hip hop, sound ...) are the loops that I work in acid 5.
attention! nobody seems to have noticed that bug with fruity 5 Spectrasonics plug-in (as acid4 but with a little buggie all) that is to say that the exports in wave does not (example: you make a rhythm with stylus and when you renderise it makes you all your sounds out of order!) everyone does not care about my problem on the official website where I bought the update ... so it has against heart that I 'evaluative a reservation!

OVERALL OPINION

Not be used if you slap your whole tune !!!!!! Spectrasonics plug in but otherwise perfect!