Ikkini
Published on 11/11/04 at 04:22
I use reaktor since version 3, it was the default of a USB key that NCESS silent vritable a disability in an i-book not possdant only two USB ports. with version 4 the default has gone, the installation was trouble-free Mac OS X 10.2. the default is the ct of updates that do not automatically like a lot of software. Audio MIDI setup is clear and simple, its behavior as a VST plug-in is exemplary. BMOL big is the manual, it is standard but contains nothing INTERESTED, it does not help the handling, it directs you to a similar use of the reaktor session The dtail the modules is quite succinct, there are no examples of Creations of instruments, we should really only dbrouiller, tutorials t would be welcome on this software type damage.
SUITABILITY/PERFORMANCE
I use a reaktor i-book G3 900 with 640 MB, this may seem a little config lgre for software of this type, but if we sort it is doing well trs. Obviously you feel frustrated at not being able to use synthtiseurs 3, 2 and 5 rhythms botes multi-effects at the same time but for the budget Submitted in my config, I am more than satisfied with respect the hardware I used before. again, I know that when I change computers (an iMac G5 srement) I would be in possession of an impressive arsenal of instruments. for now, I compose parts sparment, when using complex instruments and the sounds of freedom is beyond compare. which is great, it is the stability of Systm, I use this config on scne and I've never had a bad surprise.
OVERALL OPINION
In two years of use I am more than satisfied with this software for a ridiculous amount compared to the performance, I possde dsormais unconventional tools. my musical projects as I can adapt easily ruffed my desires. j'tais great dfenseur hardware before discovering the software, since I recommend everyone share reaktor sound qualities and diversity. instruments provided are of great quality and I pat t more than once by the quality of some filters (which always does the parent of low numrique) same if I stay my Fidler sherman when it comes to Global Warming it all, and reaktor is still great because I can change the config of my synth to the oscilloscope pass through the external filter before VCA attack ...
SUITABILITY/PERFORMANCE
I use a reaktor i-book G3 900 with 640 MB, this may seem a little config lgre for software of this type, but if we sort it is doing well trs. Obviously you feel frustrated at not being able to use synthtiseurs 3, 2 and 5 rhythms botes multi-effects at the same time but for the budget Submitted in my config, I am more than satisfied with respect the hardware I used before. again, I know that when I change computers (an iMac G5 srement) I would be in possession of an impressive arsenal of instruments. for now, I compose parts sparment, when using complex instruments and the sounds of freedom is beyond compare. which is great, it is the stability of Systm, I use this config on scne and I've never had a bad surprise.
OVERALL OPINION
In two years of use I am more than satisfied with this software for a ridiculous amount compared to the performance, I possde dsormais unconventional tools. my musical projects as I can adapt easily ruffed my desires. j'tais great dfenseur hardware before discovering the software, since I recommend everyone share reaktor sound qualities and diversity. instruments provided are of great quality and I pat t more than once by the quality of some filters (which always does the parent of low numrique) same if I stay my Fidler sherman when it comes to Global Warming it all, and reaktor is still great because I can change the config of my synth to the oscilloscope pass through the external filter before VCA attack ...