1983
Note : 2 sur 10
Published on 10/03/06 at 02:34
Possible problems after the equipment used ...
SUITABILITY/PERFORMANCE
Version less stable and much less complete than the original!
OVERALL OPINION
Let's say I'm a little pro and I work on protools past ten years.
This version does nothing if not a commercial alliance between M-Audio and Digidesign.
I think many will respond as MuseIque, users of Nuendo and sx3 will be very disappointed and this is normal. You need to have ProTools HD and DSP cards and extensions etc. to enjoy protools.
While many engineers prefer protools because he uses Cubase on a shitty soundblaster with a sm58 and protools in the studio with bands and Neumann m150 API, so distorted comparison!
And it is true that many engineers use protools as Magneto ... and maybe a plugin or two .... so this is not the most gifted sequencer!
SUITABILITY/PERFORMANCE
Version less stable and much less complete than the original!
OVERALL OPINION
Let's say I'm a little pro and I work on protools past ten years.
This version does nothing if not a commercial alliance between M-Audio and Digidesign.
I think many will respond as MuseIque, users of Nuendo and sx3 will be very disappointed and this is normal. You need to have ProTools HD and DSP cards and extensions etc. to enjoy protools.
While many engineers prefer protools because he uses Cubase on a shitty soundblaster with a sm58 and protools in the studio with bands and Neumann m150 API, so distorted comparison!
And it is true that many engineers use protools as Magneto ... and maybe a plugin or two .... so this is not the most gifted sequencer!