charlatan transfer
Published on 05/15/05 at 01:58
Headset used for almost 10 years in context Hi-Fi at beginners, listens and then mixing rcemment.
After his release, his spcificit with its large ERRF SR 2000 ifl is precisely the "IFL": "in front location," meaning that the feeling of a cost must be felt situ source e in front of you, that plutt between the ears (full head) for traditional headphones. To do this, the capsules are located in the front which allows to apply the "folds" of the outer ear that play a fundamental role in sound localization. Obviously, this headset engloble ears.
Impdance of 100 ohms, 280 grams, its ear foam + coated Nextel fabric, trs soft to the touch, comfortable to wear .... trs fine but so fragile (it is fraying on my own and to avoid having black patches on the face after each glue costs, I just desquamation. What remains trs remains below acceptable wear. Flexible cable and not twisted on the left ct with a Jack 6.35. The arch is covered with leather with a comfortable fit trs. a cost of several hours is is no problem.
Sold 900 FF in 1995, a dot dj silent sacr report quality price, - that of a sacred quality for an incredible price.
At the cost, because "IFL" seems Submitted. Well, it's not falling down, but we come to persuade himself that the sound comes from a point ahead lgrement, more precisely above the forehead between the ears plutt . It's quite enjoyable but not rvolutionnaire. As for sound, I find it enjoyable, fairly clear and fast, dynamic and transparent. This is not a round headphone and warm, which is the sub-bass slam but are serious when Submitted there with a good balance. We hear much of the fine tails rverb '.
Dernire on our production, I normment of costs and pre-mixes with, and feel that we have with hi-fi speakers is comparable trs. In short, a nice redundancy costs at the headphone and the sound MUCH.
on the other hand, it is not o the top (compared against a AKG K240 Studio) is the headphone costs at my piano numrique Roland. It's really dcharn and lacking roundness. Anyway, as it is also good rev ...
The problem of this jewel ... addition to taking the coating of the atria, transportation to the studio in a bag and not in a good box-boi firm and class ties were right atria of the arch (damn bitogniot Plastic's pt of 2 cts). In short, with a big fat roll of black tape, was a bit remains, but for how long? Snif! I do not know if Vivanco has continued in this way quality headphones but I would cry if he dfunter DEFINITIONS.
Nobody who would sell his own?
After his release, his spcificit with its large ERRF SR 2000 ifl is precisely the "IFL": "in front location," meaning that the feeling of a cost must be felt situ source e in front of you, that plutt between the ears (full head) for traditional headphones. To do this, the capsules are located in the front which allows to apply the "folds" of the outer ear that play a fundamental role in sound localization. Obviously, this headset engloble ears.
Impdance of 100 ohms, 280 grams, its ear foam + coated Nextel fabric, trs soft to the touch, comfortable to wear .... trs fine but so fragile (it is fraying on my own and to avoid having black patches on the face after each glue costs, I just desquamation. What remains trs remains below acceptable wear. Flexible cable and not twisted on the left ct with a Jack 6.35. The arch is covered with leather with a comfortable fit trs. a cost of several hours is is no problem.
Sold 900 FF in 1995, a dot dj silent sacr report quality price, - that of a sacred quality for an incredible price.
At the cost, because "IFL" seems Submitted. Well, it's not falling down, but we come to persuade himself that the sound comes from a point ahead lgrement, more precisely above the forehead between the ears plutt . It's quite enjoyable but not rvolutionnaire. As for sound, I find it enjoyable, fairly clear and fast, dynamic and transparent. This is not a round headphone and warm, which is the sub-bass slam but are serious when Submitted there with a good balance. We hear much of the fine tails rverb '.
Dernire on our production, I normment of costs and pre-mixes with, and feel that we have with hi-fi speakers is comparable trs. In short, a nice redundancy costs at the headphone and the sound MUCH.
on the other hand, it is not o the top (compared against a AKG K240 Studio) is the headphone costs at my piano numrique Roland. It's really dcharn and lacking roundness. Anyway, as it is also good rev ...
The problem of this jewel ... addition to taking the coating of the atria, transportation to the studio in a bag and not in a good box-boi firm and class ties were right atria of the arch (damn bitogniot Plastic's pt of 2 cts). In short, with a big fat roll of black tape, was a bit remains, but for how long? Snif! I do not know if Vivanco has continued in this way quality headphones but I would cry if he dfunter DEFINITIONS.
Nobody who would sell his own?