All user reviews for the Yamaha Tyros 2

So for the sounds of the tyros 2: NOTHING TO SAY vrritablement, really sounds good and everything AND sonnorits characteristics of Gnrale fawn is frankly the GOOD.
malgrs the fact that it is composed of 61 keys that I put 10/10 without hsiter.

USE

For parcontre use the ...
Facing a ROLAND G-70 tyros dutout does not hold water in terms of ergonomics.
I find the best arranger Introduced on roland well as on the tyros, the possibilities are much more gandes.
My BIGGEST regret is the abscence of "smart" mode, a function of the arranger for me is serious practice.
When the manual, drop ... I have a G-70 at home for 2 years and I have opened his textbook few times.
However, it can aprcier other things like singing, composing (pristine audio recording is very correct), carry it without much problem it is fragile (it was always the fear of scratching or break the screen ...), we can register our name and given name and to be displayed ds turning on the camera lol!
We have fun all the same well with tyros.

NOTICE GLOBAL

To conclude I would say I do not regret my choice, but between tyros and G-70, it would really weigh the pros and cons for the roland is a very very good machine, shame we do can regain the sounds of tyros above sniff !!!

All this to say that I am because I combl 2 watching me home h h

So for the sounds of the tyros 2: NOTHING TO SAY vrritablement, really sounds good and everything AND sonnorits characteristics of Gnrale fawn is frankly the GOOD.
malgrs the fact that it is composed of 61 keys that I put 10/10 without hsiter.

USE

For parcontre use the ...
Facing a ROLAND G-70 tyros dutout does not hold water in terms of ergonomics.
I find the best arranger Introduced on roland well as on the tyros, the possibilities are much more gandes.
My BIGGEST regret is the abscence of "smart" mode, a function of the arranger for me is serious practice.
When the manual, drop ... I have a G-70 at home for 2 years and I have opened his textbook few times.
However, it can aprcier other things like singing, composing (pristine audio recording is very correct), carry it without much problem it is fragile (it was always the fear of scratching or break the screen ...), we can register our name and given name and to be displayed ds turning on the camera lol!
We have fun all the same well with tyros.

NOTICE GLOBAL

To conclude I would say I do not regret my choice, but between tyros and G-70, it would really weigh the pros and cons for the roland is a very very good machine, shame we do can regain the sounds of tyros above sniff !!!

All this to say that I am because I combl 2 watching me home h h

So for the sounds of the tyros 2: NOTHING TO SAY vrritablement, really sounds good and everything AND sonnorits characteristics of Gnrale fawn is frankly the GOOD.
malgrs the fact that it is composed of 61 keys that I put 10/10 without hsiter.

USE

For parcontre use the ...
Facing a ROLAND G-70 tyros dutout does not hold water in terms of ergonomics.
I find the best arranger Introduced on roland well as on the tyros, the possibilities are much more gandes.
My BIGGEST regret is the abscence of "smart" mode, a function of the arranger for me is serious practice.
When the manual, drop ... I have a G-70 at home for 2 years and I have opened his textbook few times.
However, it can aprcier other things like singing, composing (pristine audio recording is very correct), carry it without much problem it is fragile (it was always the fear of scratching or break the screen ...), we can register our name and given name and to be displayed ds turning on the camera lol!
We have fun all the same well with tyros.

NOTICE GLOBAL

To conclude I would say I do not regret my choice, but between tyros and G-70, it would really weigh the pros and cons for the roland is a very very good machine, shame we do can regain the sounds of tyros above sniff !!!

All this to say that I am because I combl 2 watching me home h h

Keyboard Arrangers
If you already have the state TYROS1 then it is duly TYROS 2, one would believe I see no accompanying sounds organs rest no comment, the strings, sound synthesizers, I recommend The Music Finder incredible short I went from 1 to 2 with no regrets ........

UTILIZATION

After two hours of trial and error, and I'm talking about the engeulade made by Madame, the verdict
Same as tyros 1, I have not tried yet I still align to Fidler sd1)
only regret not 76 ratings

OVERALL OPINION

Nothing to say

Many new high quality pads trs incredible choice, classic, Oriental, modern, arpges, etc ...
And yes! There is indeed an easy to use sampler incorporated either on the keyboard keys to pitch comparable or not comparable effects + all the sounds in programmable "User"!
Wave or the disc drive ...
Many new rhythms, easy compared to all ACCS Tyros 1
Many amlioration sounds also in many
Everything is better, 100% of progress and it retains the rhythms and functions of the Tyros 1
Amlioration keyboard and manufacturing in Japan and not China ...
Direct recording disc drive also.

UTILIZATION

Super easy and intuitive handling direct and ACCS amliors

OVERALL OPINION

One week
Quality unbeatable price on the market also found ...
I have also a Roland G 70 and I assure you that the two compltent incredibly well, we can really play at all and without limit.

Updating my previous post - I now have my Tyros 2 for 1 month.
Reminder: Before I had a PSR8000.

I confirm the incredible sound quality but beware, the default settings of the device include a lot of reverb and chorus. Off when all these effects, falls a little enthusiasm. I wonder how the outcome will be when I start mixing with seriously: ie when I start transferring the audio track by track in Cubase. With all these effects, I'm afraid phase shifts.
In this regard, the MIDI settings seem to me very complex ... Finally, it will be a second post.

Guitars and drum kit are extraordinary. The pianos are very good but not great. The electric pianos are fa-bu-lous! Multi Pads are great and numerous. But in practice, it is still missing after all.

The micro level is really impressive: the default settings are beautiful, it's a pleasure to sing 'in it' - a must! For cons, the harmonizer is NULL, only one program can be used: the unison mode. All others are kitsch and robotics at will, without musicality. It is a real regression in relation to psr8000, which offered at least the effects of vocoder of very good quality if not to offer beautiful harmonies. As against the mode pitch correction is efficient and discreet.

attention: the audio on HD is not multi-track, which greatly limits its interest (a kind of luxury which dictaphone). That's all to reach a binz copy a song recorded on a USB key and only the WAV mode is supported. Wide plan for your USB key! But it is good practice anyway, and it can record a quick idea of ​​melody without turning on the PC.

UTILIZATION

The strength of this instrument, and the reason that made me choose from the G70: Entering into agreements step mode. For those (like me) who do not play well is the ability to create very easily again, reading chord names on the score or tablature. On the tyros 2, all agreements are expected, even those with a '/' (that means with a different bass I think) is really the top. For example, I could record the song "You have been loved" by Michael G. - one piece at a complex structure and jazzy that I had never been able to reproduce on any of my previous arrangers!

I will send you a link to my MP3 demos on request.

The large black dot: the arranger. Again, big regression in relation to who owned the PSR8000 mode intelligent arranger 'which brought some humanity to the patterns. Here, none of this, the styles are very beautiful and numerous, but repetitive and boring as the song than a minute. No change or steady progression after alternating major / minor as I had such on my old Roland. Listening to: this net is a robot playing and nobody is fooled. Big big disappointment ...

As for the connection to the PC is unusable. I think other software will emerge to exploit all the possibilities really.

For cons, the direct connection to internet is stirring. With a USB wifi (offered) I go directly to the internet (through my freebox) from the screen of Tyros, without turning on the PC. You can download styles, songs, lessons to learn to play ... it is very easy to use. on the other hand, there's quite a few styles to buy (average 5 euros) and I feel they are very 'types' - for example I downloaded 90powerballad (or something like that) and quelquesoit chords played, it looks like death Bryan Adams (Robin Hood) - it's funny (but is it useful?) on the other hand, this style uses electric guitars beautifully: it is believed.

I have not tried the sampler, but I'm looking forward to!

OVERALL OPINION

Very expensive (3800 euros in this case), I almost regret ...
But the sounds are beautiful, and there are lots of nice features, it's a very fun instrument, I spent hours having fun on it ... it makes you want to learn to play to replace the deficiencies of the arranger who is not up to the rest, unfortunately.

About the G70 and Pa1X: In Valencia, the "music box" where I bought my Tyros, they had the 3 demo side by side: royal to compare.
I found the Pa1X Veillot and completely obsolete: that train! but the sounds are good. The editing step is but the ergonomics are so awful about this function that makes it unusable.
The G70: super compact but very beautiful and very pro, but at first mainly dedicated to the 'live'. The step recording agreements does not exist (just note by note). Piano sounds are very beautiful, but the guitars I prefer the tyros. It seemed that the arranger of the G70 was much more nuanced, human, musical short. But I'm not good enough to use such a thing.

Ok, user depuis3 months, so it's time
I'm not pianniste but guitarist and I use it primarily as accompaniateur and for me the low battery
the audio output connector is provided with six outputs but we can not get out
lot of separate edition for USB and the computer, I do not know
when one takes the psr 3000 behind it is clear that it is a gadget rating
but the styles are almost the same malheureusement.si the battery system
recording, punch in, out, creator and sounds are great, the styles themselves do
are not very Varr, there's tempo to hold to realize
such as a flamenco 4t and 3t with clap clap and it's good it gotesque
there is 20 different styles groin in flamenco, you it is still necessary to see the
competent people for advice, after we find the same with flutes and bagpipes a little further and it's been the Irish this time, bah! is public

effects are very good quality but if you leave the music ... a rev range from about 15 max if it is a horror, but it sounds on the tyros

UTILIZATION

The edition is quite easy ... when we realized ... but this stuff is very long while
channels one by one and not do anything stupid ......, and we want to move a copy too nb of data (bateries functions that are off

setting setting memory is capricious while this does not m place and
of being turned back, patacrac, must start over

the manual, pffff, if I had to write it would be much simpler

hard drive, very good tool to guide a guitar singing in such metronome
j'enregitre then reshape the style creator via live by drawing a right to left breaks ditto ditto, and the resulting output is stunning .... TERMINATOR

OVERALL OPINION

What I like? It's still a nice machine and you can dial it even without being a pianist, the whole system, in general, but poor enough styles eventually
should have the power comande things styles you want, but hey you can aisemment
and then create yourself ....
I consider the tyros like a beautiful weapon of war but which can greatly IMPROVE
on details that are not the most difficult to overcome
FURTHER NOTICE

IN RESPONSE kiki3 and for all the world to enjoy

Registration for the internal sounds on the left of the machine, 16 tracks
partitionage and non-destructive editing of data

for audio, right side 2 stereo tracks of very average quality
no need to rever to work with pro
16-bit, noise, remix at will re-register every time
enregistremments with precedents and depreciation of its decision to each aditional

not score in either audio or text that writes itself

transfer data on a computer using the supplied CD-ROM + XGworks
logitiel the yamaha to buy from

can play the magneto noon with the hard drive (audio) but just by pressing
of play at the right time and if they have records in metronome if it's dead
but on the side noon (internal sounds of tyros) can recombine enregistremments we did with other styles, the apareil to resynchronize
its a little scam (like I am the king of arrangers) but it works

OK ??????

Arranger keyboard, 61 keys keyboard, touch weighted, comfortable, makes a good play on stage or in homestudio.
Full connectivity (video too ... I do not use it but hey ...).
Many sounds, covering a wide variety of styles: pop, latin, jazz, electro etc. .... sounds have a good dynamic, is not much to take on the sounds of instruments (piano, EP, strings, acoustic guitars / electrical etc. ....). A good place to sound "SUPER ARTICULATED" who Soner instruments with the nuances of instruments ... it's not at all aml.
The effects section is quite complete and very effective, especially the EQ to suit the mixer / sound because sometimes, a certain sound frequencies are not well reproduced: the EQ haureusement are there!
The sequencer arranger is not bad, you have to dive in to understand the intricacies of the keyboard as well as components for the arrangements sequencer can go quite afar. However, the philosophy of this gear is rather an arranger workstation but it can very well use it to dial.

UTILIZATION

In view of the multitude of parameters, the configuration is relatively complicated ... But the price of a good result! There are no free lunches!! The game controls (backlit keys) are very convenient, especially for areas with reduced lighting (piano bar) it is seen!
Parameter editing is easy thanks to the big screen keypad (menu, pages, etc. ....).
The manual is thick, not very clear on some points but it does not represent an obstacle to understanding the craft.
The "synthesis" is limited to the amplitude envelopes and filters, effects and controls Mod. Wheel etc. .... it was already quite a lot! There is already a lot to do with the composition!

OVERALL OPINION

6 months ...
TOP sounds are: a good sound system These and the foot!! We take pleasure to accompany him, to compose or arrange ... really: thank you Yamaha!
There are still many things which I do not even use it on the keyboard but it will come ...
The beast is expensive but I think this is a sustainable investment. The only negative I see is the keyboard 61 keys: 76 aurra been welcome!
Re-election may not be as long as it is there and well I would use it but if YAMAHA deign to 76 keys out I would be greatly interested!
I'm not 10/10, but it would have abused a very good machine, I have tried many (Roland VA7 or other Korg PA50 all this all this ...) and I chose on the Tyros 2 and I do not regret it farre away ...

Tyros 2: superb, I've had it yesterday and it's a great day for me that goes to the Tyros2 PSR9000!
I enjoy the moment and I discovered, after I get down to business ...

UTILIZATION

For the manual, it is not so much easier to operate than the PSR9000, but hey it's still useable
for editing sounds I do not know yet!
but the keys light I think it's great practice on stage, on screen is really great;
there are plenty of features available in ESP directly contraitement where to go and look in the menu, which on stage is not always clear
I am giving my opinion in a few weeks and after a first baluchi ...

OVERALL OPINION

I'm using it since yesterday;
what I like most is the realism of the sounds
the value is good in my opinion
in terms of experience, I have nothing more to say!
I think I'll still spend the night ......

While there, to the sounds of tyros 2: NOTHING TO SAY vérritablement, it sounds really good and everything sonnorités characteristics and, in general it's frankly good.
Despite the fact that it is composed of only 61 keys I put 10/10 without hesitation.

UTILIZATION

For use parcontre here ...
Faced with a ROLAND G-70 the tyros does not dutout the road in terms of ergonomics.
I find the best presented to the arranger roland well as on the tyros, the possibilities are much more Gander.
My biggest regret is the abscence of how "intelligent", according to an arranger for me is a serious practice.
When the manual, forget it ... I have a G-70 has been home for two years and I opened the manual only a few times.
However, it can therefore enjoy other things like singing, call (recording pristine audio is correct), transport it safely while it is still fragile (it was always the fear of scratching or breaking the screen .. .), we can put our full name to appear soon and the lighting of the camera lol!
Fun all the same well with a tyros.

OVERALL OPINION

In conclusion I would say that I do not regret my choice, but between a tyros and G-70, it should really weigh the pros and cons because the roland is a very good machine, too bad we can not find the sound top of tyros snif!

All that to say that I am overwhelmed because I have the two looking at me in my hey! hey!