View other reviews for this product:
philharmonique « I'm in love »
Published on 12/01/12 at 17:59Les Paul copy 59
Japonnaise manufacturing.
Mine is dated 1991, the truss rod cover has two small wings, supports microphones have a sticker but noted VH1 microphones mounted at this time are not.
The table is a slightly flamed veneer on a non-negligible thickness maple. The body is mahogany (a real one!), 2 pieces, assembly and choice of wood so well that it is very difficult to distinguish the two parties.
The mahogany neck is one piece, the key is in a beautiful rosewood.
The sunburst is very successful, the varnish is not nitrocellulose.
In summary, this model is not the most sought after by collectors of lutherie in the country of the rising sun, and yet ...
UTILIZATION
The weight is that of a les paul in his side's reasonable term.
The handle is very nice and round me coming out over a year Telecaster, I have not had trouble getting it to and I really find some good sensations Les Paul I possessed a few years ago.
Ergonomics? ben is that a les paul neither more nor less.
The fittings are of very good quality, conforming to the model copied and electronics reveals no particular problem.
SOUNDS
I practiced the guitar for 15 days without being able to connect and then hear what gave the microphones.
What I learned in 30 years of practice instrument is an electric guitar that does not sound vacuum will not rattapé with very good pickups.
Back home, I plugged in my beautiful Fender different.
It's out the les paul! I cons by a huge imbalance between the volume of two microphones that I'm correct stain if possible, otherwise I would put two of PAFs in MS Tornado and the matter will be resolved.
OVERALL OPINION
I am delighted with this purchase even if I reinvest in a pair of microphone, a guitar is really well made, although the upper Tokai recent production I paid 1000 euros two years ago.
I would do this choice rather 2 That a time.
Japonnaise manufacturing.
Mine is dated 1991, the truss rod cover has two small wings, supports microphones have a sticker but noted VH1 microphones mounted at this time are not.
The table is a slightly flamed veneer on a non-negligible thickness maple. The body is mahogany (a real one!), 2 pieces, assembly and choice of wood so well that it is very difficult to distinguish the two parties.
The mahogany neck is one piece, the key is in a beautiful rosewood.
The sunburst is very successful, the varnish is not nitrocellulose.
In summary, this model is not the most sought after by collectors of lutherie in the country of the rising sun, and yet ...
UTILIZATION
The weight is that of a les paul in his side's reasonable term.
The handle is very nice and round me coming out over a year Telecaster, I have not had trouble getting it to and I really find some good sensations Les Paul I possessed a few years ago.
Ergonomics? ben is that a les paul neither more nor less.
The fittings are of very good quality, conforming to the model copied and electronics reveals no particular problem.
SOUNDS
I practiced the guitar for 15 days without being able to connect and then hear what gave the microphones.
What I learned in 30 years of practice instrument is an electric guitar that does not sound vacuum will not rattapé with very good pickups.
Back home, I plugged in my beautiful Fender different.
It's out the les paul! I cons by a huge imbalance between the volume of two microphones that I'm correct stain if possible, otherwise I would put two of PAFs in MS Tornado and the matter will be resolved.
OVERALL OPINION
I am delighted with this purchase even if I reinvest in a pair of microphone, a guitar is really well made, although the upper Tokai recent production I paid 1000 euros two years ago.
I would do this choice rather 2 That a time.