Lâg Roxane Matt Design R100MD

View Previous opinion, this prs: RM 100 out of workshops in Asia (god knows where) and verifies that is in France only MODELS top-end Fully raliss are in France.

The one I tried (long) in-store silent trs well finished, no glue dborde, no weight problem (I wonder o Previous notice is all look a): it is more lgre, for example, that my Ibanez RG 170 ...

Problem: it stings a little nose as the body is pretty lightweight.

UTILIZATION

The handle is asses enjoyable, varnish glides well. It's not too pais, to give an order of IDE, and compared to other guitars I tried it is located between the handle of a D LTD SERIES F , EC and V for example, and an Ibanez (not too flat, not too pais)

Access in acute poses no problem, double cutaway, in addition to being visually Russi, is ergonomic (what does a guitar bought by the publisher of the notice pr cdent? A Stagg?).

SOUNDS

I tried it on a Roland Cube, a small machine so versatile and not bad enough.

In terms of sound, is that the bt hurts the distos starved for PCHE and relief in the neck position as a bridge: just to make it more biting in bridge, m ' last little while of the same.

In crunch, or more bluesy, it has not fared much better, it still lacks the EHJV sound, rather flat, somewhat bland, without being either "dgueulasse" (or whatever The term used more by my alcoholic prdcesseur obviously).

The clean sounds are pretty ugly in the neck pickup: Despite donf Tone, Treble dssprement remain low. In bridge pickup, the default is corrected and the sound becomes more brilliance: it's better but not transcendent default versatility makes this guitar.

Other default: the pickups are not splitables, so no crystal-clear to clear for.

OVERALL OPINION

This was only a test store, before I look at her big sister the RM 200 on which I cracked.

I still possde for now, until the Lag or book an Ibanez GRG170DX, so in the same price range, which is definitely better than the lag, especially with a view sounds.

But I wanted post this notice to offset Previous, the work of someone frustrated to have bought his guitar at Thomann without trying and obviously it bites your fingers .

This guitar is honnte, not transcendent, the problem is the price: for 100 euros less, I could be described as a beginners guitar (still better than Stagg), but the report quality-price is of the same low-asses.

Made in China (according to the label on the back of the neck rception the package)

Data sheet:

Bolt in stocky, fixed by 4 inserts mtalliques
Guide reinforcement body / rosewood neck, Systm exclusive Lg
Rosewood Black
22 frets mdium
Lg Mcaniques high-precision
Solid basswood body
2 humbuckers Power-Magnet Lg
Tunomatic rope bridge and block standard
2 volumes and 1 Tone indpendants gnrale
Slecteur microphones 3 positions (Toggle)
Matt Chrome finish fittings
Matt varnish

UTILIZATION

I find the handle trs enjoyable, no significant dsquilibre between the body and the head.
N'tant not based guitarist (bassist but big fingers), aa t CRITERIA dominant (with the price range).

SOUNDS

As for sound, I can not really judge. I use this guitar with a view home studio, to paste composed guitar parts on jazz / rock a little electro. I do not know what that can give a guitar type config-> tte/effets-> baffle.
The pickups are a good offense and a dress code, the sound therefore supports the crushing. And that's all that mattered.

OVERALL OPINION

I have not been away a year and I am satisfied plutt. No good or bad surprise. I tried a few Ibanez (G) RG in the same price range (because it is a sign that I like the bass) and another (Cort I think), and I finally chose the LAG for the handle.

I opened it once for the electronic CONTRL, APRS m'tre took shots fill the bridge. The cblages plutt are well made. Moreover, the problem did not come but the multi-purpose (!).

Under the same conditions, I would do this choice. But it is a market segment that is renewed fast enough. To see so among the newcomers ...