picvert
Published on 06/25/06 at 04:24
I use it for a year.
+: Canopus DV codec, recognized as the best in DV editing possibilities of signal acquisition, according to sync sound and image (no thanks dcalage recording the internal clock)
-: Noisy fan
dj I used almost total scope Sony DV and DVCAM (DSR 11, 25, 40, 80 and 1000), scope and DVCPRO firewire Casing Dazzle and Pinnacle. But since the tests on computer magazines, maps Canopus have the best signal processing.
no, I do not would do the same choice, Boti, even if it is of good quality trs is too noisy for use in editing the film (clean fittings with a fan silences c is not possible)
+: Canopus DV codec, recognized as the best in DV editing possibilities of signal acquisition, according to sync sound and image (no thanks dcalage recording the internal clock)
-: Noisy fan
dj I used almost total scope Sony DV and DVCAM (DSR 11, 25, 40, 80 and 1000), scope and DVCPRO firewire Casing Dazzle and Pinnacle. But since the tests on computer magazines, maps Canopus have the best signal processing.
no, I do not would do the same choice, Boti, even if it is of good quality trs is too noisy for use in editing the film (clean fittings with a fan silences c is not possible)