All user reviews for the L-Acoustics MDT112

The "little ERRF" of MTD115. Used in return.

Well, I'm an absolute fan of the L-Acoustics products. But the non-DSOL.
For me, this forum does not want the comparison with the MTD115. It is expected the same product, less powerful, and in fact it was another forum, that blind can not really ever closer of 115. MTD112 the lack of serious (well, OK, a little logic when same), performance (good, it is also logical), but also and especially of musicality: the beautiful farewell acute aggressive mediums welcome .. .

Well, clearly, I do not like this place. And, curiously, I realize that I am not alone: ​​she refuses on many sheets. And besides, I find CHRE for the quality provided ...

I find the opinion prcedent a bit pessimistic ...
Indeed the small ERRF of MTD115 (the MTD112) marks some diffrence ds treble, but if it is known filter (with a good Equa, your forget you ...), 01V AC is peanuts .. .

Yes I agree that a couple Gengen not, but all fawn, if you want to make a stack, take the ARCS ...

actually it can wipe a refusal on the sheet as a return:
Primo) in the REFERENCE HEIL 115FM or remaining the 115XT, why take something so well? (It is worth your duck l'orange? Nan Dguelasse, it has to be put on the menu!)
deuzio) The rocker who wants the big ki spot in his ears, APRS moultes years passed before the wall 4X12 ke do swear by LE400 (y'en ki gets off the treble Pay your filthy ... Return fuzz ... lol)

Personally, I think this place is unparalleled for distributed sound system (the MTD115 be too big)
Installation on a type of bar THEME musical sound here is a ready-made solution cohrente
2 MTD112 "hanging in" at the bar (you decide their direction according to your sadism to the bartenders), by multiplying the reminders if ncessaire in this area with a minimum distance of 3 meters from the speakers (to avoid the dcouplage).
The recall of MTD108 room, and SB118 with 2 cache in the institution (Verify first the Architecture of the room).

I use this system in all my config for the past 5 years distributed, absolutely no problem of maintenance, if any time you are an experienced user ...

I do not enter it in the game L-acoustics/Nexo because I think the only way to sound the PS15, is still plugging without the controller (Personal opinion is binding ki ke me!)

A firm cost, prcise, trs race after all (what ke tiring after the 8th hour 105 dB SPL) a spectacular attack (if combined with the amps of the same brand) and manufacture of a physical type ingnirie nuclear, are ke I am a big fan of the product ... HEIL

And then I loose a COCORICO chauvinism (Luckily for football because it's not a)
because L-acoustics and indeed one of the jewels of the European Technology Q ki kicks the Yankees on their home turf, the KUDO proving it once again ...

Finally, I would say that like all L-ACOUSTICS, the purchase is trs painful, but we could ** No value for money!

I board in use for nine years a fleet of 12 112 for Mtd home of dance, theater and acoustic music - trad jazz - in a national stage. It was very difficult to find fault, whether in front or back use. I love color, the return of the diabolical coherence and spectral transition brings the coaxial system - to bring the Tannoy. I board not had the opportunity to try the big sister Mtd 115, and so I can try to compare. However, I board did a lot of shelf rock back as manager and I know the Martin LE-400 and Nexo PS-15 which tend to replace them in recent years. I personally do not like the bowls but I think I understand the reason for their use and comparison with recurrent BAT 112 can be interesting. It seems that when an engineer taking on the design of an economic forum, he have to choose between performance or focus improve spectral accuracy. I think this is the difference between the most and the PS15 Mtd112.
The Nexo has the "ball" but it is very hard, even aggressive in the upper-medium and its response curve is on the edge of fantasy - I board tried one day where I had broadcast front-sic - of analyze and correct: the result was unusable, Eq my graph 'like a mountain course Russian. However the pressure delivered and directivity asymmetrical tightly controlled effectively allows to work at home on a rock plateau that often reaches 100 dBA, as in this case the mix must be returned utility to avoid escalation decibel and where we should concentrate on giving each zicos just what he needs.
L-Acoustic is very thin and strong respectuese signal that is sent. on the other hand, it has not the "ball" and its directivity 90 ° makes it "dicey" in a rock'n roll with a lot of microphones in return mix. However, it will do wonders in an acoustic which allows high accuracy at low volume work and respect the habit of listening to each other musicians on traditional instruments, non-amplified. I board had virtually no criticism in this specific context, while I was doing the mix often return from the front. Yes it may seem a little expensive when you consider the price of a pair of the amp and processor. The latter is expensive and absolutely necessary: ​​Not only it has a "sense" of return and protection of the couple amp / speaker but the linear aspect of the response curve seemed vested: BAT 112 without the process 'is no longer a Mtd! on the other hand, it's a choice of first order in time because the build quality is the quasi-military sweep all concurrent endurance and reliability issue over time. At about 1000 Euros unity, this gives vraimment thinking - Argus Sonomag.
I would like the opportunity to test the 115fm appears to have characteristics more suited to the constraints of amplified music back in use. But this is not the same price, and should then be compared with models more active high-end home Adamson, Meyer, D & B or Apogee. Models rare in our country but well known across the Rhine and Belgium, where equipment budgets are not the same as here. QED!