Audiophony SI-601 - Sono-Ev.'s review
translatedThe presentation is a bit dated these days but the functionalities are still NEWS. More nice presents in a rack and especially more pro because this board is quite able to provide on small and medium…
Audiophony SI-601 - " Complte but dmode"
translatedUsed for several years in the evening, what I like most is that it is complemented. Banks allow raliser beautiful sets with the sample. The effects are not too bad except the scratch but the best opt…
Audiophony SI-601 - " I love it"
translatedThis table is a marvel, a technology concentrated, possder imprativement in your set
Audiophony SI-601 - Sono-Ev.'s review
translatedVery good turntable with a lot of functionality. I like the data banks that allow raliser good mixes with the built-semple. Master Tone function to raliser good combos. The effects are very average q…
Audiophony CDX3 - cochi26's review
translatedI desire to have information on this deck has such automatic bpm counter
Audiophony CDX6 - " the false bargain CDX6"
translatedI used last year. First CD player, I was platinum classic. It is true that on paper, they are promising but the reality is quite different. The loops are very, but very far from perfect, the sample…
Audiophony CDX6 - " Good turntable"
translatedThe deck is a very good value for money. The effects of manual adjustment loop, and the scratch is much appreciated.
Audiophony CDX6 - " Opinion mixed"
translatedI use these boards for almost a year I used acquéris these plates they were served very little It is not comparable certe cdj 2000 has nexus ^ ^ (I posséderé a pair in 2013/2014) The effects ar…
Audiophony CDX6 - " Exelent product!"
translatedHow long have you been using? - That almost 1 year. What is so special that you like most and least? - Sinkers very comprehensive and competitive compared to some brands! Easy grip. Nothing to…
Audiophony CDX4 - " cdx4"
translatedmy cdj 100s are doing very, very old they had to be replaced, use only animation. So no pio pio or denon ...... useless, I needed a simple, practical and reliable, if possible. my choice is focus…
Audiophony CDX4 - " Correct"
translatedI use it for 1 year now (and dust). Yes, I try Pioneer CDJ 400 (I think). It is true that Audiophony Pioneer and have nothing to do. The + The pitch, the USB port, the LED screen and cue …
Audiophony CDX6 - milwaukee's review
translatedfor 1 year and a half it is not my first purchase in this type of product the feature that I like most is its practicality to enjoy all the features. the less is its slowness with USB - suddenl…
Audiophony CDX6 - " CDX6 AudioPhony beautiful platinum Dj"
translatedsince October 2011 yes, a double CD that cheap not walk very well as are the effects, scratching, the sample, the pitch that makes 100, the perfect curls, responsiveness and usability of the pr…
Audiophony CDX6 - " frankly discouraged"
translatedIt's soon 2 years since I bought my cdx 6 but in this day and I would advise everybody has to buy a moin he wants to spend their money in repairs after a year. At first I had them I thought it turned…
Audiophony CDX6 - " I do not recommeded"
translatedI bought this board 2 years ago and I compared it often has the cdj 400 is my time was soon over, because the rubber button are bof time the registration it is clear the crap and MP3 playback ( acces…
