PG24/PG58 classified ad
New ad alertImages
Reviews
3.6/5(5 reviews)
20 %
60 %
20 %
Write a user review
dj alinoprice / quality ratio pretty decent
Published on 02/09/12 at 02:58 (This content has been automatically translated from French)I have over two years now and frankly for the price it's still okay well you just settle it on your table. do not push your micro channel as a nag if saturation. sometimes you have changerde channel as if it shit. otherwise it remains a good microphone. I recommend it strongly on a budget. Itis reliable and easy to pack and you have shureentre hands. rashurant is all the same. on the other hand if you're talkative interest is to source or a battery charger and rechargeable batteries.
10
»
chrisOM74Published on 12/24/07 at 04:13 (This content has been automatically translated from French)
Hi
I rcament used for animation (Christmas tree) So the first part of evening only micro.Les + animation, Intal trs trs simple, you plug the power supply, power cord xlr / XLR, channel search and voila it fontionne.Longue port.Rapport qualitprix EXCELLENT for 249 you have between mains.Les SHURE - no rglage volume Receivers, a can of noise in the pregnant while manipulating but frankly is a trs correct rglage with a good mixer and all is well.
@ +
I rcament used for animation (Christmas tree) So the first part of evening only micro.Les + animation, Intal trs trs simple, you plug the power supply, power cord xlr / XLR, channel search and voila it fontionne.Longue port.Rapport qualitprix EXCELLENT for 249 you have between mains.Les SHURE - no rglage volume Receivers, a can of noise in the pregnant while manipulating but frankly is a trs correct rglage with a good mixer and all is well.
@ +
10
»
kevsonoPublished on 01/18/09 at 05:39 (This content has been automatically translated from French)
Hello everybody. Here I will give my positive advice on Shure ...
How long have you use it?
I use it for a few months to be more prcis I use it for 4 months
Did you try other models before acqurir?
Yes, I have been testing as MODELS Mac Mah, Samson, Toa, and of course stay on Shure. He might have the quality Pg 58, we really feel like using an SM 58. It is a high quality microphone that I have the opportunity to use more professional than this, I am personally satisfied with TRS.
How do you judge the report qualitprix?
Personally I find nothing shocking. I do not think it's an expensive compared to the microphones trs UR4D HF Receivers with whom I work daily. But...…
How long have you use it?
I use it for a few months to be more prcis I use it for 4 months
Did you try other models before acqurir?
Yes, I have been testing as MODELS Mac Mah, Samson, Toa, and of course stay on Shure. He might have the quality Pg 58, we really feel like using an SM 58. It is a high quality microphone that I have the opportunity to use more professional than this, I am personally satisfied with TRS.
How do you judge the report qualitprix?
Personally I find nothing shocking. I do not think it's an expensive compared to the microphones trs UR4D HF Receivers with whom I work daily. But...…
Read more
Hello everybody. Here I will give my positive advice on Shure ...
How long have you use it?
I use it for a few months to be more prcis I use it for 4 months
Did you try other models before acqurir?
Yes, I have been testing as MODELS Mac Mah, Samson, Toa, and of course stay on Shure. He might have the quality Pg 58, we really feel like using an SM 58. It is a high quality microphone that I have the opportunity to use more professional than this, I am personally satisfied with TRS.
How do you judge the report qualitprix?
Personally I find nothing shocking. I do not think it's an expensive compared to the microphones trs UR4D HF Receivers with whom I work daily. But despite its price drisoire, its quality is Ingala. Without common sense, of course.
Exprience with, you will do again this choice?
I prsume as a self-evident and I would say that yes I do it again with no exprience this choice without any hsitation.
The sound reproduction of the microphone:
the +: large doors, no cuts HF signal and noise, grain ok but not equal to the sennheiser (I love sennheiser micro grain), long held about nine hours of battery, no noise of sagrable handling a microphone, Receivers installation quick and easy no antenna so vritable save space, we can stack in at least 10 no problem. Really no problem. Everything is perfect ...
I recommend ...
How long have you use it?
I use it for a few months to be more prcis I use it for 4 months
Did you try other models before acqurir?
Yes, I have been testing as MODELS Mac Mah, Samson, Toa, and of course stay on Shure. He might have the quality Pg 58, we really feel like using an SM 58. It is a high quality microphone that I have the opportunity to use more professional than this, I am personally satisfied with TRS.
How do you judge the report qualitprix?
Personally I find nothing shocking. I do not think it's an expensive compared to the microphones trs UR4D HF Receivers with whom I work daily. But despite its price drisoire, its quality is Ingala. Without common sense, of course.
Exprience with, you will do again this choice?
I prsume as a self-evident and I would say that yes I do it again with no exprience this choice without any hsitation.
The sound reproduction of the microphone:
the +: large doors, no cuts HF signal and noise, grain ok but not equal to the sennheiser (I love sennheiser micro grain), long held about nine hours of battery, no noise of sagrable handling a microphone, Receivers installation quick and easy no antenna so vritable save space, we can stack in at least 10 no problem. Really no problem. Everything is perfect ...
I recommend ...
See less
20
»
angepitoPublished on 07/09/10 at 13:30 (This content has been automatically translated from French)
hello first of all
frankly I would summarize this product in one word ... crap
too expensive for what it is ... a very small beginning of end Shure and shame them
no power for a singer ... I have an AKG cheaper and frankly it's 100 times better
is a microphone that can lend me and I'm happy not having to buy
has definitively proscribe
frankly I would summarize this product in one word ... crap
too expensive for what it is ... a very small beginning of end Shure and shame them
no power for a singer ... I have an AKG cheaper and frankly it's 100 times better
is a microphone that can lend me and I'm happy not having to buy
has definitively proscribe
02
»
Tech. sheet
- Manufacturer: Shure
- Model: PG24/PG58
- Category: Wireless systems
- Added in our database on: 09/14/2006
We have no technical specifications for this product
but your help will be much welcomed
»
Other categories in Wireless gear
Other names: pg24 pg58, pg 24/pg 58, pg24pg58, pg 24pg 58