Log in
Log in

or
Create an account

or
< All Korg DTR-1000 reviews
Add this product to
  • My former gear
  • My current gear
  • My wishlist
Korg DTR-1000
Images
1/236
Price engine
Classified Ads
Forums
VicMacKey VicMacKey
Published on 07/01/08 at 05:25
I use it for several months, APRS have chosen to put all my effects rack. I possde version of the photo is of the form AF.
What is with this tuner is that it is trs trs prcis and fast, and it gives both the guitars with the bass so bad. the front is a little incline that amliore the readability of the display (the frame is the same as the DTR-2000). Connectivity front / rear is adequate for what we do: we can go through the first tuner and then back into a receiver for the best precision tuning possible, the sound is not modified. Recess can also connect via the exit "tuner" of any amp. Unlike what one might think, the look is not that tape that has the eye and is rather simple (no effect tuning).
The counterpart is that it occupies 1U in rack is a lot of space for a single functionality but it makes trs trs well.
Acqurir before, I had a handheld tuner. Trs trs prcis or not fast, but very practical for small footprint.
The report is average in nine qualitprix because it is expensive for a tuner, but it is the best tuners in this price range: the 2000 version has some features and more, not fundamentally necessary for guitarists / bassists electrical, namely tuning of acoustic instruments, 2 inputs, rtroclairage ... but is more CHRE, and Peterson Stroborack is even more expensive than the DTR-2000 ... I put 9 because there are better (DTR-2000 and Stroborack), but for that price you will not find better!
I would do that choice occasion, worth for people who 1U free and want a good rack tuner.