Log in
Log in

or
Create an account

or
Add this product to
  • My former gear
  • My current gear
  • My wishlist
Steinberg Houston
Images
1/28

All user reviews for the Steinberg Houston

Price engine
Classified Ads
Forums
Not satisfied with those reviews?
Filter
5.0/5
(5 reviews)
80 %
(4 reviews)
Write a user review
Users reviews
  • OlafOlaf

    Good product

    Steinberg HoustonPublished on 01/08/14 at 02:11
    (This content has been automatically translated from French)
    I no longer use it for 2 years, but I'm me served for more than 10 years.
    Fully compatible with Cubase and Nuendo.
    Very good product, faders are now a little tired but it still works.
  • ardierardier

    Effective

    Steinberg HoustonPublished on 12/31/13 at 07:53
    (This content has been automatically translated from French)
    I used 2 years
    to summarize what is the ultimate control surface for Cubase, but I sold it for a single reason ... instead ... and I do not like the hui protocol and constraints at display
    I have since replaced by p1 nektar panorama which is more compact but unfortunately that did not motorized fader.
  • youmdesyoumdes

    Steinberg HoustonPublished on 03/11/03 at 07:21
    (This content has been automatically translated from French)
    Purchased in June 2002,
    I find it gnial, easy and intuitive ACCS.
    The engine and the wheel transportation make it a quick rev to dplacer or mix Cubase (or Nuendo ...).
    The pav numrique can freely assign functions that are DSIR (call from any window, save, quantify ...).
    The knobs are endless also very practical for everything from pan automation, rglage EQ, etc ... but less convenient for "large" virtual synths because you end up with an impressive number of pages diffrent (24 for PPG Wave 2 and 19 for the Pro53) so if there was a small rglage do, the mouse is still welcome.
    The price remains nanmoins a bit expensive for a "simple" tlcommande which merely replaces the job of the f…
    Read more
    Purchased in June 2002,
    I find it gnial, easy and intuitive ACCS.
    The engine and the wheel transportation make it a quick rev to dplacer or mix Cubase (or Nuendo ...).
    The pav numrique can freely assign functions that are DSIR (call from any window, save, quantify ...).
    The knobs are endless also very practical for everything from pan automation, rglage EQ, etc ... but less convenient for "large" virtual synths because you end up with an impressive number of pages diffrent (24 for PPG Wave 2 and 19 for the Pro53) so if there was a small rglage do, the mouse is still welcome.
    The price remains nanmoins a bit expensive for a "simple" tlcommande which merely replaces the job of the field mouse ...
    See less
  • Anonymous

    Steinberg HoustonPublished on 10/08/08 at 01:57
    (This content has been automatically translated from French)
    I use it since 2003 ...

    what I like most is the stability of the 9 faders and control simple and prcis of all parameters of Cubase and Nuendo ect

    Yes, I tried the Mackie Control, the bcf in 2000 and frankly I am more sensitive on the draw sheet houston everything is so simple and costal bte is really not his toy playskool

    CHRE has just released her but now it can reach 600 euros for a OCCAZ

    yes, recess
  • Danidani72Danidani72

    Steinberg HoustonPublished on 01/11/10 at 04:35
    (This content has been automatically translated from French)
    excellent product running on Windows Seven and under cubase 5.02, ras point out here running !!!!! very suitable for cubase which is normal.