Log in
Log in

or
Create an account

or
< All Behringer C-2 reviews
Clément Bally Clément Bally
Published on 05/19/08 at 02:55
No need to go back over everything t said.

OVERALL OPINION

It has been three years since I use mainly two couples live
I have tests primarily for choirs and acoustic guitars, piano, snare, hh, oh, ... Compared to the price to say anything:
Actually they are gaps (for cons I've never had a problem or gain of breath diffrent: my four C2 rpondent all alike), but they are very practical for live. I mean to sound with a choir of 40 singers in a gym full crack (1000 entries) we are left with neuman tions KM184. These taient almost too thin and too sensitive: you could hear the friction of the garments, the 'travel and ds that are pushing some were hung with the face. The C2 rvls have much more efficient, certainly not for trs, trs but their music and have a natural default blurred the noise. On the instruments, once again, its not a trs end but I got a clear, warm trs, trs cohrent and without real correction.

In short, by their default, I got to do stuff that I could not couraging with major standards such as 451, KM184 ...

At this price, do they go without you ever dpanneront.