All user reviews for the Pioneer DJM-400

- The type of connections are: master rca, rca for two voices, too, mini jack for fader start and for the microphone and headphone jack close
- Yes it has an effects section and you can choose what you want or is the effect (micro, voice 1, 2 or master).

UTILIZATION

Gnrale-configuration is very simple, the buttons are all wearing the hand so it's cool.
-Functions are easily accessible just half an hour and we understand what each button does or can do.
"I had no need to read the user manual so that's good, but being given that I bought at the United States so that's the instructions read in English is not great because I am masi TElement not good good I can find the instructions on the net but not required.

SOUNDS

-The qualisateur is very effective when sagit to kill, but I think it should be more gradual but it is not very troublesome is a very small dtail.

OVERALL OPINION

"I use this table for one month and a half Envir.
-Most: she has very good effect, but neither is a shame that not more but hey I vias rather say that it is no longer I who do not like the effect it has TElement like robot, delay and I not going to please a friend of mine but I like the roll at all but good time although I will love and attention I say no quil quil are void because the effects are not well do that but I'm like it .. and the least: the samples hard too soon.
The quality-price ratio as for all of our pioneer days.
-With your eyes closed.

See below

UTILIZATION

See below

SOUNDS

See below

OVERALL OPINION

I tested my DJM-400 an hour. I think I will complete in three months after my competition I spend acutellement. For the moment it is stored

For a first impression, it is excellent: very well synchronized effects, good ergonomics, very effective kill (kill 3 = 0dB out), good glide faders, not a complaint yet.

A short video:


to see the possibilities of the beast.
But there are many more (including BPM samples easily adjustable to the nearest unit, bypassing the TAP).

Show Specifies manufacturer.
The DJM400 rpond my needs

UTILIZATION

CONTRL panel is unadorned and DIFFERENT lments are well balanced, the selection of the cue is ultra clear.
The manual clearly explains the use of the Difference knob "LEVEL / DEPTH" according to the types of effects.

SOUNDS

3-band EQ impressive flexibility in cutting the right line frequency drives up to have no signal if the knobs are 3 "- ∞".
Gniaux effects (note, the roll to the jungle / DB is staggering).
The processor for calculating BPM synchronization of effects is prcis and can not be easily fooled by pieces syncope.
The sampler is effective and the loops following recalent BPM calculation.
The "TAP" can double or halve the sync effects from the original BPM of the song, giving FX DIFFERENT renderings of the "auto detect".
The faders are flexible with a good linear curve opening.

OVERALL OPINION

I use it for 2 weeks and every time I put fingers in, it'll difficult of stopping ...
The pros: the EQs, effects, faders (I will not put all spcs)
The -: It takes one is the brightness of the FX ON / OFF: why is a button so bright, which, in use in the pnombre, prevents to see the correct value of the knob " LEVEL / DEPTH "? It's really to say I found a default ...
Report qualitprix: trs good.
I would do the same choice without hsiter.

I use it for three weeks is an excellent table that I recommend to anyone looking for a quality product!
Boite a great effect, while pots super slides well and is precise trs.
one will notice its lack of a third voice, a bit more space between the EQ, and a USB port will be great for the computer. but hey it's a great product that I do not regret Ocun!
I would do this choice.
PS: go to thomann.de prices are really interresting I ua 444 AISIN is the same price for the cdj 200.

UTILIZATION

N

SOUNDS

N

OVERALL OPINION

N

I was looking for a compact table of professional quality with reasonable price effects. I opt for the Pioneer trusting the brand. CHARACTERISTICS equivalent but lower price, there are only Numark offering comparable products in the SERIES DXM, but I have doubts about the long-term quality rel. I speak not even Behringer

UTILIZATION

The table size is very compact, well finished trs.
The faders have a very good linear curve, the knobs are prcis, for damages against, they are not rubber but of hard plastic that is not enjoyable to touch trs. In addition, they are closer plutt trs the thickness of two fingers is not between two knobs.
The headphone costs at handling simple, despite the lack of function "prmix" there against by the breath (I use the excellent Sennheiser HD-25).
The meters: one voice, two voices, master, are easy to read a big plus over the old table that I used (Stanton M.303)
The effect bote a good gadget, is not too much abuse, however, the effects are of good quality. The roll is a kind of sampler is INTERESTED handle. I also like the phaser and flanger. As against the filter is a little too radical I got, and the echo is sometimes ineffective.
I test the sampler through the accapella is ultra convenient but not exploitable. However, the sampler is efficient trs we can stall like a c'tait troisime platinum (pitch and pitch bend).

SOUNDS

The sound is really prcis, clear, no saturation in the treble. For we feel that it is against the numrique, you must have good decks derrires.
With two Stanton lack of warmth in the bass. While Stanton with a table of TRS analog I had good bass.
With a pair of CDJ-800MK2 the sound quality is much better no lack of bass, DEFINITIONS sound much better.
[edit] APRS 4 months I realized that the sound of the master table is compressed, no problem in pr-cost voice 1 or 2, in pr against Master-cost or Master Output 1 or 2, the sound is highly DGRAD! I will compare with the DJM-400 from a friend, to see if the electronic circuit of my table would not lead to falling behind. [/ EDIT]

[edit 2] False alarm, my friend also had the same problem, we realized that the button stereo / mono derrire the table s'tait engaged. It has sre APRS works much better: D If you ever have a sound DGRAD vrifier this little switch. [/ EDIT 2]

OVERALL OPINION

Satisfied with this product as a whole: compact, quality sound, cool effects.
The report / trs quality price is good for those who do not need more than 2 channels (see 3) I recommend it.

See the website pioneer

UTILIZATION

- The configuration gnrale Is it easy? yes trs

- The usual functions are they easily accessible? yes

- The manual is clear and sufficient? not just look in one eye, he seems okay!

SOUNDS

I find the sound great! no breath, cut minus infinity and no sound will come out and not a breath!

The sound is great, I branch and connected to my amp Harman Kardon Home cinma, I put in 2x70 RMS Stereo with JBL E90 110 W RMS, and I redcouvert my bass, the sound of great quality I find, I will try on my sound system when I have the opportunity, but the I am happy with the sound trs.

OVERALL OPINION

- How long have you use it? um 2 days

- What is the particular feature you like best and least? The most effective Intgr box.

At least, I can not say, because the only mixer before I c'tait a DJM 300, roughly the same, without the effects box, but I think the sound is better when m me.

<p class="bbcode-cite"> Quote: <span>- Is the rack?
- How many lanes, bus attendant, of dparts, returns ...)?
- What is the type of connectors (RCA, Jack, XLR ...)?
- The qualiseur paramtrique is it?
- The effects section is it intgre? ...</span>
The doc .

Big regret at the outputs of the table are only RCA . No, but what is this crap, we&#39;ll have to find Cables RCA -> XLR to attack on the filter DBX .

UTILIZATION

<p class="bbcode-cite"> Quote: <span>- The configuration gnrale is it simple?</span>
It is smaller than average, and is easily habitable. All the buttons are logically situs was everything you need on hand, but they are so pissed off that they have deleted the pots and pan the return / booth. So we have two rated output by only one master knob .

<p class="bbcode-cite"> Quote: <span>- The usual functions are they easily accessible?</span>
LEDs are traditional colors of green / orange / red (too bad I like the original but situs at the center of the table view and the level Manir tract but also that of the master without raising or look down .

The headphone jack is located on the front of the table which is now mandatory for me, the controls of the headset are located just above the connector, with a great sense trs .

Only slectionneur type of racing Crossfader seemed ill situ.

Then there is 2 options, the linear stroke of the crossfader or running ultra-short, however there are a lightweight dcalage (2mm) before the sound passes. I do not know if this is the wear on the table or not, but it is easy to remdier (for those who apprcie the scratch, although it is not really a table that must ) With two small wedges artfully places .

<p class="bbcode-cite"> Quote: <span>- The manual is clear and sufficient? ...</span>
Unread!

SOUNDS

<p class="bbcode-cite"> Quote: <span>- The console is transparent?</span>
I will not the sound quality in depth, because it often takes the HIFI and good ears to hear the little nuances of the other table. Personally as long as the sound is clean I do not say much about . This report says nothing of the ct .

<p class="bbcode-cite"> Quote: <span>- Introduced she breath?</span>

I prcise on the other hand it was not a nine MODEL But a MODEL who served in evening, but as always in very good state as used by people working in the sound box of benefit .

Ds ignition I see a strong breath, yet everything is plugged in Line (I have not used parts phono), it is in Stereo, so it is a default having said that this table is used in night (so she can be known misra, although I doubt it). But if the breath is Submitted on a new one, then it is the hcatombe so low it&#39;s unbearable rgime (film, costs ...), a sweet Misr. Besides the fact to lower the faders, knobs or change anything. Besides the Master volume is also added his breath quickly enough curse ("/> (" />.

<p class="bbcode-cite"> Quote: <span>- The qualiseur is it effective? ...</span>
CUT a well with a Linari own!

On the other hand the effects are actually sympathetic trs except roll sampler and that DCAL too easily (the time limit is much more fun). But often the use of these give a gain boost effect which rapidly enter your table in the orange, see Red (My Love Distortion ), And hello dgts on the sound and the speakers when they are almost the limit, it then enters the range limit (Crappy on this point).

But overall the effects are enjoyable use, especially with the little button rgler time trs are effective when you click on it several times, varying the time, it allows a small part crativit apprciable of high, especially since they ragissent from the hip Then you can play with the depth or grind the switch of choice for FX channel or even the switch from FX to give even small alternatives that will diversify the potential effects .

OVERALL OPINION

<p class="bbcode-cite"> Quote: <span>- How long have you use it?</span>
Test for a week.

<p class="bbcode-cite"> Quote: <span>- What is the particular feature you like best and least?</span>
From the perspective of finishing, the product is quite nice, nothing extravagant (it is even a little sad excluding some effect). It may be lacking a bit of color to make it more intuitive and therefore faster to use. The paint seems pretty rsistante assault, the TLE is properly folded, may be missing a bit of filing on the edges to make them even less accorchant (a bit EXAGRES I say the same when ).

The table gives the possibility to connect two micro (modifiable by an auxiliary input), which is very well and gain their rgler indpendamment, only there is no real equalizer for the latter because one can knob clear up or darken the way, that&#39;s all .

It is not possible to reverse the 2-way, so be careful not to scratcher ambidextrous (but arrter want to scratch with the 400 ).

Just in the pots that look hard plastic does not seem terrible. Actually it is not to touch the must, the soft compound would most apprciable t, nanmoins the quality of rotation of these is impeccable, a switch easily enough with the small maintenance to keep the CONTRL (this as the case on many tables Dornava). When using the Kill are fully effective and the pots are a good Linares.

The disparities between the pots is more than enough so as not to pinch your fingers, and their size gives a good grip, or should I say fingers .

The buttons at the sampler / effect providing full satisfaction, no need to press hard, a small bed appears quickly and without hassle, they should not cause worry .

For faders (and crossfader same), I&#39;ve really find toc (as many MODEL in store) is all plastic, super lightweight, has pitched a little about c ts .... And yet they work well trs (but changed my Numark Pro SM2 ). So comfort level is pretty bad (as the average of the tables I&#39;ve seen), but from the technical point of view, it is progressive, does not make a noise during use .... .

We also see that times have changed since the Pro SM2 because I could put 4 vinyls and 2 line, now the opposite time of MP3 and company .

The power button is well located particulirement the rear .

<p class="bbcode-cite"> Quote: <span>- Have you tried many other models before acqurir?</span>
Ecler Smac first, SM2 Numark Pro, Vestax PMC-280 Pro, Mackie D.2 and Ecler Nuo3.

<p class="bbcode-cite"> Quote: <span>- How do you report qualitprix?</span>
Trs good. However between the PMC-280 Pro and it there is something hsiter long as each advantages and inconvnients , Hard drive, but at the cost outweighs the PMC should be lower than the Pioneer 400 to bounce back

Show Specifies manufacturer.
The DJM400 rpond my needs

UTILIZATION

Hyper Simple Config
Yes
Pa read

SOUNDS

The console introduced breath when the fader closed kon opens the master has his and thoroughly Lampl: s I c pa normal if c: s
if not its a pure wonder
lequaliseur and ultra efficient Kill dla race we kan Dj Elektro

OVERALL OPINION

I have been using the 24 December 2007 Christmas jl received the jav and evening entertainment in a big room so j could discover the compartment has the djm 500 MDRR c dla bomb atomik has the effect his tomb parterreeeee
The pros: its his-
Kill her-
-Lergonomie
-The precision of the table
the-:-size: s and yes it a dir jou tro ptit: sm good balance on sen
The breath-kan is always lower faders qulon m master thoroughly and klampli: kil s ptetre fo KJE changes the RCA mafoiiii
I refer this choixx eSite without saying that a jesite mortttt!! With the pmc-280 home vestax m j crack for pio pio: D lollll
APLuchhhhhh enriches us all the mondeeee MIx_N_Joy

- Is the rack?
Not

- How many lanes, bus attendant, departures, returns ...)?
2 Way (with Fader Start) + 2 Mic (or an auxiliary stereo input)
Master and Rec
headphone

- What is the type of connectors (RCA, Jack, XLR ...)?
2 Ways to RCA (Phono / Line)
Master and Rec CAR
Micro Jack 6.35
Headphone Jack 6.35
1 Control by
1 GND

- The parametric equalizer is it?
Not
3 Cuts per track (HI / MID / LOW)
1 EQ on the microphone (LOW / HI)

- The effects section is it integrated?
Yes: 7 + effects on IN-LOOP SAMPLER

- The Master outputs can be set in Stereo or Mono
- Phono inputs can be switched in Line
- For the micro was a switch ON / OFF / TALK OVER

I put 8 / 10 because I would have appreciated an effects loop (send / return) and the ability to adjust the gain of the Master and Rec separately.

UTILIZATION

- The general configuration is it simple?
Very simple configuration, except for earnings and the Master, there is nothing (or almost) to solve (Phono or Line, Micro or auxiliary curve of the Cross)

- The usual functions are they easily accessible?
Everything is easily accessible, a conventional arrangement but still effective:
- The section on the left headphone and microphone
- The two tracks in the center with Cuts, the gains
- The Cross just below the curve setting
- Right, the Master box and effects

A conventional arrangement with Pioneer but proven. Are assigned very easily have an effect on a track, the microphone or the Master: two notched knob, one for selecting the effect and the other for the assignment.

In short everything is easy to use!

- The manual is clear and sufficient?
The manual is very filled but there are still clear. I do not have it in front so I could not comment, but anyone who knows what a mixer, which includes the word Line, Phone, ... and who knows what an RCA will be largely satisfied with the explanations.

I find this mixer very comfortable, very convenient (because of its size), the knobs and faders are nice (though I prefer those of its big sister the DJM800), the backlit buttons let you see on those that were activated or not, the BPM counter is clear (at the same time it displays the BPM of 3 numbers) and accurate. Some will find that the IN-LOOP SAMPLER is not very easy to use but in reality it is (n quick glance at the manual, you look a little demo video and go).
The buttons to adjust the effects are great (1 / 2 4 / 1 but you can go more or less far depending on the effect with the buttons + / -) have fun with the fast roll or same with the other effects.

SOUNDS

- The console is transparent?
Yes! The sound is very good, no crackling sounds unpleasant to others even when saturated, the sound is "clean" (I put in quotes because a saturated sound is never good but I&#39;ve seen worse)

- Introduced she breath?
No (or I do not hear it). In the headphone by means against a breath when they cut everything and you go up the headphone volume, but that&#39;s all.

- The equalizer is effective?
Yes! the cuts (from - infinity to +9) is perfect I think (those who mix electro not contradict me I think).
For the microphone, I could not tell you what it is I have not had the opportunity to test.

OVERALL OPINION

- How long have you use it?
For a little over 2 months.

- What is so special that you like most and least?
+ The format of the mixer (compact)
+ Ability to toggle Phono Line
Quality + Pioneer
+ The effects of very high quality
- Unable to set the gain of the Master and Rec separately
- Can not adjust the BPM other than the APR (a combination Time + TAP as the 800 would have been perfect but we do not have the knob on the Time 400 which can be for some other negative)

- Have you tried many other models before buying it?
DJM600, DJM800, Nuo2

- How would you rate the quality / price?
It is the pioneer, it&#39;s expensive, it is not even repeat it is nothing but quality, strength, know-how and everything else is paid for her, and frankly at the end there is rarely disappointed .

- With experience, you do again this choice?
Certainly!

Finally, I would say the DJM400 is a very good mix Able 2-way complete, it offers many possibilities. I would not say it is perfect because it is not true: even when it lacks a few things that are not essential but very sure that would be practical, so I would give it an overall score of 8 / 10.

My review was written based on my experience in the mix on CD and more in the style electro / house. I&#39;ve never tried or seen work in other situations (Vinyl, Scratch, ...)

Already said

UTILIZATION

Already said

SOUNDS

Already said

OVERALL OPINION

- How long have you use it?
1 week

- What is the particular feature you like best and least?
most: while I think the least ... nothing for me, it is for me and the electro!

- Have you tried many other models before acqurir?
Numark 5000FX, Vestax PMC Pro 3

- How do you report qualitprix?
trs honest

- With the exprience, you do again this choice?
yes, but it's good to change

Dj said

UTILIZATION

- The configuration gnrale Is it easy?
Trs simple, easy connect, easy to use
- The usual functions are they easily accessible?
Trs accessible, no need manual
- The manual is clear and sufficient? ...
The manual is so ...... inutil the hardware is easy to use!

SOUNDS

Say anything!

OVERALL OPINION

- How long have you use it?
I use it for more than a month
- What is the particular feature you like best and least?
Plus:
Simplicitbr /> Efficacitbr /> Effects
Ergonomics
The quality of the hardware
- Have you tried many other models before acqurir?
Gemini PMX-140, Ecler Nuo 4
- How do you report qualitprix?
Report qualitprix really correct when you see the hardware that was in the hands especially when I found it on a commercial site of 460 new and Audiofanzine excl ...... .
- With the exprience, you do again this choice? ...
Without hsiter!!

Good food aside from the lack of XLR outputs and settings for the microphone.

UTILIZATION

- The general configuration is it simple?
Very simple.
- The usual functions are they easily accessible?
Yes
- The manual is clear and sufficient? ...
He even useless so the table is simple.

SOUNDS

- The console is transparent?
Yes
- Introduced she breath?
Not
- The equalizer is effective? ...
Yes

OVERALL OPINION

- How long have you use it?
I use it for a Year. 1 time per week to see less.
- What is so special that you like most and least?
The +: The Sound Quality
Effects
Design
- Have you tried many other models before buying it?
No, I already knew the DJM 800 and 600 and the Mac 70 and 90 of Eclerc.
- How would you rate the quality / price?
Good
- With experience, you do again this choice? ...
Not if I had more budget.

Already said and I think more than enough to use at home.

UTILIZATION

The general configuration and functions are very simple.
The manual has never been used.
The only thing I have learned not to discover myself is the ability to switch a loop from one track to another. We made a loop or a sample (or roll functions in-loop sampler) and once activated the effect, by switching lanes, it is rocking.

SOUNDS

The sound is good, I did not feel out of breath and the equalizer is very effective.

OVERALL OPINION

I use it for almost a year.

I like almost everything on this plate: solid appearance and class, sound, ease of use, the effects small but effective and easy to calibrate, the BPM counter.
What I liked: more opportunities in the headphones (the wet / dry and independent channel volume)

Before I had a console NUMARK DXM06. Less beautiful, less effective levels of effects and fragile (an knob dropped me after a few weeks) but it would cost much less.

The Pioneer is not given but its price is justified.
With the experience I would resume the same!

In conclusion, for me the best 2-way console market.

See the manual for specifications.

UTILIZATION

Simple setup, and you plug it mixes, no worries particular.

I have not read the manual

Pioneer has a knack for making products recognizable at first glance, the DJM 400 is no exception to the rule and for those who are accustomed to Pioneer products, everything falls perfectly under the fingers. And you can switch to different models DJM carefree, we soon find its bearings.

SOUNDS

Although not a model of clarity of sound, it is not the last, perhaps thanks to digital? ...

EQs are effective but are not exceptional, I think it's fair emieux that.

Found no obvious blows.

OVERALL OPINION

It has been 4 years since I use it, I bought used (6 months) to a member of AF.
She has done a lot of evenings, she worked for more than a dozen hours sometimes without any problems, she worked at a party to over 35 degrees, it heats but does not break!

Before I had the DJ Technics SH 1200, good sturdy table but not age well at the knobs and breath.
Numark also a ...
But the Pioneer is on top.

What I like most: almost everything! It is a small two-lane, of course, but well used (effects, sampler) it can be daunting in the evening ... and I much prefer having my DJM 400 with its 2 channels and some effects used at 100% a big DJM 2000 which will never be pushed to its maximum capacity (see a lot of DJ's ...)
It is small and not heavy, easily transportable, coupled with my two CDJ 200, this is a trio who, despite the years, remains relatively cool!

What I like least? The EQ, for form ... and the absence of send / return ...

400 euro bought 4 years ago, for the number of evening and I did with the miles she has traveled and seen its state (impeccable!!) I would say value for money excellent. Nothing to say about the reliability and robustness.

With experience, I would do this choice without hesitation.
I was looking to change my set-up, but actually, what that Pioneer offers the best in the range 2-way? The DJM 909 reaches retirement and does not justify its price. The DJM 350 offers fewer opportunities.

I remain faithful to my DJM 400 ...