R 212 CX classified ad
Alerte nouvelle annonceImages
Reviews
4.5/5(2 reviews)
50 %
50 %
Write a user review
CountdownVery good price / quality ratio!
Published on 07/13/12 at 14:02 (This content has been automatically translated from French)Bought 250 euros fdp IN, I used this cabinet for 1 year, 1an1 / 2 or less, with the head "matched" the RH100G2 (incidentally, one of the best head for the transistor hi-gain!)!
It was my first cabinet ... I sold it to a vertical ENGL 212 V30!
Inside, two Celestion Seventy 80 G12.
Level finish, this cabinet is very well done, no default on the Tolex, grill cloth or elsewhere. Its rugged appearance, he inspires confidence for handling.
Wood is still thinner than the ENGL for example ...
(S) alone (s) accused (s) that I would finish this cab level, is the lack of original wheel (for me, any 2x12 should be provided), and the absence 2 "real" metal side handles! Indeed, the handle...…
It was my first cabinet ... I sold it to a vertical ENGL 212 V30!
Inside, two Celestion Seventy 80 G12.
Level finish, this cabinet is very well done, no default on the Tolex, grill cloth or elsewhere. Its rugged appearance, he inspires confidence for handling.
Wood is still thinner than the ENGL for example ...
(S) alone (s) accused (s) that I would finish this cab level, is the lack of original wheel (for me, any 2x12 should be provided), and the absence 2 "real" metal side handles! Indeed, the handle...…
Read more
Bought 250 euros fdp IN, I used this cabinet for 1 year, 1an1 / 2 or less, with the head "matched" the RH100G2 (incidentally, one of the best head for the transistor hi-gain!)!
It was my first cabinet ... I sold it to a vertical ENGL 212 V30!
Inside, two Celestion Seventy 80 G12.
Level finish, this cabinet is very well done, no default on the Tolex, grill cloth or elsewhere. Its rugged appearance, he inspires confidence for handling.
Wood is still thinner than the ENGL for example ...
(S) alone (s) accused (s) that I would finish this cab level, is the lack of original wheel (for me, any 2x12 should be provided), and the absence 2 "real" metal side handles! Indeed, the handle is style "amp head", in plasticky, on top of the Cab!
This is unfortunate, because it is a device that can often have a tendency to lug around ...
Otherwise, the level it was really not bad!
I found it very pleasant in the high range ... quite sharp and aggressive, not garish at all. Low, without being exceptional, are quite present, but not too much! Much less "pronounced" for example a V30! Nevertheless, the balance in the frequencies is made.
I would do not elect to minor gripes that I have quoted above, and because now I can afford to offer me something better, but the value for money this product is really excellent.
The sound is very good. The HP was always there for something ...
I tried it with only the head RH100G2 Randall, and medium volume!
My opinion is perhaps to be taken lightly, but hey, I still wanted to give it!
PS: I posted some pictures in "media" ...
It was my first cabinet ... I sold it to a vertical ENGL 212 V30!
Inside, two Celestion Seventy 80 G12.
Level finish, this cabinet is very well done, no default on the Tolex, grill cloth or elsewhere. Its rugged appearance, he inspires confidence for handling.
Wood is still thinner than the ENGL for example ...
(S) alone (s) accused (s) that I would finish this cab level, is the lack of original wheel (for me, any 2x12 should be provided), and the absence 2 "real" metal side handles! Indeed, the handle is style "amp head", in plasticky, on top of the Cab!
This is unfortunate, because it is a device that can often have a tendency to lug around ...
Otherwise, the level it was really not bad!
I found it very pleasant in the high range ... quite sharp and aggressive, not garish at all. Low, without being exceptional, are quite present, but not too much! Much less "pronounced" for example a V30! Nevertheless, the balance in the frequencies is made.
I would do not elect to minor gripes that I have quoted above, and because now I can afford to offer me something better, but the value for money this product is really excellent.
The sound is very good. The HP was always there for something ...
I tried it with only the head RH100G2 Randall, and medium volume!
My opinion is perhaps to be taken lightly, but hey, I still wanted to give it!
PS: I posted some pictures in "media" ...
See less
30
»
Anonymous Published on 10/08/06 at 03:01 (This content has been automatically translated from French)
For some days.
Trs robust, good manufacturing it's hard to believe that are made in China ...
I play with a head of the mm mark (rh300g3) is EXCELLENT and are the Celestion Seventy 80 is as competitive as v30.
I try some others whose Bafle 2x12 bocoup the front, but too expensive for me: D
The value for money is unbeatable ^ ^
I hesitate not remake that choice without hesitation.
Trs robust, good manufacturing it's hard to believe that are made in China ...
I play with a head of the mm mark (rh300g3) is EXCELLENT and are the Celestion Seventy 80 is as competitive as v30.
I try some others whose Bafle 2x12 bocoup the front, but too expensive for me: D
The value for money is unbeatable ^ ^
I hesitate not remake that choice without hesitation.
10
»
Tech. sheet
- Manufacturer: Randall
- Model: R 212 CX
- Category: 2x12 Guitar Cabinets
- Added in our database on: 02/21/2004
We have no technical specifications for this product
but your help will be much welcomed
»
Other categories in Guitar Cabinets
Other names: r 212 cx, r212cx, r212 cx, r 212cx