All user reviews for the Ecler nuo3

As indicated in the news:

* Power dcoupage (90-260V) oversized.
* Pr-amp Intgr.
* 60mm Fader with VCA.
* Extra large rotary knobs.
* 3-band EQ with Cut.
* Switch off by bass.
* RCA input / output for external effects stro.
* Double VU nitre ultra prcis (PFL / Mix).
* LEDs prsence signal and clip through.
* Switches rtro-clear LEDs tilted by 20.
* Symtrique output XLR.

UTILIZATION

Trs easy to use, no need to read the instructions to understand the basic functions.

Orders have t r-organized from the smacpro30 and are really willing.
Aside from possibly be the rglages faders and x-fader situs forward, I do not have, but it's a personal decision.
The faders are nice and soft trs, however I find the curve a little bit special.
Precision: We can rgler the curve tracks 1 & 3!
This time it leaves the placement Ecler oblique and vertical prfre faders.
The large knobs are nice correction, nanmoins is lacking a bit of space, for example to turn a two corrections same way is not the top. They are notched on the 0, but we feel pain, it's nice, but I fear that a lack of precision hair.
Given the two-nitre are useful because trs trs prcis, finished tracks that balance in the mix than the other 10 dB!

SOUNDS

I find the best correections dcoupes as the smacpro30. Indeed, now the medium cup + in medium / high as + smac that drew in the medium / bass.
Nuo3 on, when you cut the bass is not heard in rsons mediums.

Sonoritsgnrales level we remain in the quality Ecler, no surprise, then.

OVERALL OPINION

I reu the mixer this week, so I do not have much down to really judge everything, but I can already say that it is a good table trs, which succde dignity the SMAC.

No rack
3-way RCA
3 outputs: one in XLR3, and CAR, plus the output rec CAR.
Output / FX CAR between the levels of which are adjustable by a knob for each channel.

UTILIZATION

The table is super simple to understand is how a table.
The knobs are large, so friendly enough tater, and their race is just the right length to be able to send a ct the other a "click". I personally think there is enough space between each but some are found too close ...

There is a knob of SETTING THE vertical cross curve 1 & 3 (why not 2?) And a reverse, it's pretty cool ... but not essential.
The vumtre is super prcis and many cal.
Buttons to select tracks or not to send the headphones are in the eqs each track.
The send level knobs effects on each track are also under the EQS, which is good too.

Rglage of the cross is a great rgalll ... Dj switch to select between short and sharp, a knob to fine tune, and a small button to place the dpart of the race. Prcis If we can have cross open and closed in one millimtre.
I really enjoy the fact that they are on the front of the table, but the button is not running dpart being protected at all, so it's pretty boring, a can of settle for nothing ...
on the other hand, not rely on the manual that explains how to turn A Z the table but that is limited a. Although the logic of things like "not plug your amp 3kils between the phono" are explained, but dmerde to replace your cross.

SOUNDS

I have not yet been tested on a good amp with good speakers, but dj with headphones the sound is clean (and thankfully), the eqs are very clear and spars. If you cut the Aiges we were able to Aiges AT ALL. the three eqs own. Regret: If we lower med hight and it was always a little bit of meds in the low, but that's nit-picking, nothing embarrassing, it's not a table of monitoring either ...
No breath (and then what else?).
The pan is also pretty clean, but still a gadget my taste.

EDIT: APRS almost a month of use, I can say that the sound is good. Trs good in the same mediums.
For the scratch was really a diffrence because the volume is slowed almost the same as in acclrs. So no need to touch the volume in mid-sentence.

OVERALL OPINION

It's only been a week that I have, so my opinions are still fresh, and no real walls, but I'm in love with the dj cross adjustable quarter of millimtre prs. I rgl opening half of millimtre dpart, and it really is pure mass murder ...
What I find con is the fact that the two vertical cross 1 & 3 are adjustable, not 3, so should not be forgotten in a mix, if for example changes the shape of the curve or direction, does not affect the way a 2 ...
Otherwise, as I said eqs are good, the sound is clean, there is a basskill on each channel, the more I see why, but clean.
The whole gives an impression of solidity the box is massive thread about the cross (those who have dj cass the nail in the palm of a screw know it's important).
I tried a lot of scratch mixers up the but not long enough not to have a real opinion, truth is my Premire true mixer, but I feel it will take me a long time. ..
Regarding the report qualitprix this day seems to me appropriate, try to think back to ask my opinion APRS 6 months-1 year of use ...

EDIT: One month, even happier.

No need for you dcrire, what you want to know is what I think.

UTILIZATION

Accustomed to an old Freevox 80's, the handling of this table "Punchy" is bizarre. (But of quality.

SOUNDS

Extra finish, velvet faders, knobs are all plastoc and do not reassure, (on Freevox is metal and it is screwed dessu / dessou, ca not move!) At this point, I wish more "solid", the Gmini Sounds a bit but I'm STRID. I do not use the crossfader but Sounds interresting. It is expected to use a cross spcial, sold with an optional feature of supplmentaire well chiade curve SETTING THE ... When we cut the three bands, there's been a sound, cash is: we are in the "very effective". Even if the need be.
You can also place internal jumpers to change the output level ...
In short the quality of the sound remains buena-buena, it's clean, powerful and precise.
The headphone level is good. Gains Azro tracks do not cut the sound completely.

OVERALL OPINION

But I saw a production that persists with the changeover function faders, (even after a first return SAV)
it looks like an over-amplification sudden phono tracks when I almost lost my monitors. continued ...

Hello,

I use a NUO 3 and 2 since the month of January before I was working with a brand that no longer produced (forget the name but very solid table and bone). Here are my thoughts:
MOST:
- It has a good sonoritbr /> - connections are varis Master 1 and 2
- All buttons are really useful and easy to use
- Lightweight and not too fragile

The Cons:
- The default manufacturing often rptitifs I acht NUO two and both have a problem making Surla 3 is the cue that has a hard time staying down the other is a button that is PForm.
- After some use of two NUO NUO I think the three have no more place, the NUO 2 couraging exactly the same feats as his big sister.
- Gums in caotchou stuck under the table I find a cheap bof and trs.

If a hand is no particular default is a good production, for I find they are against trs moisture sensitive because I live in Guyana.

I use them with accessories for PIONEER in Mobile Disco.

UTILIZATION

Very well

SOUNDS

Is better than PIONEER

OVERALL OPINION

I remain satisfied throughout trs

There is everything you need! XLR and RCA master independently adjustable! (Rare for a table) and return effect, the masses are of good quality, 3 inputs per channel (what else?) So hyper a lot of practice lorsu'on reader plug in short it lacks the effect section above but I do not use effective

UTILIZATION

As everyone says when we dj we know how to use a table lol the question is no point in short easy to use

SOUNDS

Then I pause a little on this point, the sound is the bomb! nickel is really when you cut all the eq there is no sound, it's really great! it swings too much potato with a small amp CROWN is a real hit!

OVERALL OPINION

I use it for 3 months
The pros: it kills the sound mess!
the -: of the eq button is missing the small detent 0dB for a stall is its annoying sometimes! but hey I'm quibbling the
if not for the battle / hip hop cross is really cut it pretty well but I think with the ETERNAL is not even worth a table but it still remains for a electro / house
I would do with the experience that choice even though I do not ECLER at all (I'm still vestax)

Ditto for people who use it, I depuit a year, I already try a numark pro sm1
the most is that with one little scratch, this 3-way, the meter is not eternal fader!
vrment sound is perfect,
finally, behold the good!
the only BMOL putting my note 9 / 10 making it, yes I think the knob is a bit fragile at last must not be a big Bourin, but if sil is super!
but when you move from left to right it moves a little
it does not matter but be atention, otherwise it's the bomb I suggest to everyone
my criticism remains as I'm farm trs trs manic, it is not worth even when 10/10

UTILIZATION

The manual is perfect

SOUNDS

No perfect breath

OVERALL OPINION

Raport quality / price
EXCELLENT!
459 expensive sound system
ceu for that spineless make good todo! https://www.sound-system.com/
or there is the table that the lowest price I found around the internet etc ...
NEW COURSE

Dj prciser I want from a critic, that there is a notch in the middle of the potentiomtres qualiseur!

<p class="bbcode-cite"> Quote: <span>- Is the rack?
- How many lanes, bus attendant, of dparts, returns ...)?
- What is the type of connectors (RCA, Jack, XLR ...)?
- The qualiseur paramtrique is it?
- The effects section is it intgre? ...</span>
View CHARACTERISTICS .

UTILIZATION

<p class="bbcode-cite"> Quote: <span>- The configuration gnrale is it simple?</span>
Compltement logic. For the balance against a t-section dport master, it might be a new mode .

<p class="bbcode-cite"> Quote: <span>- The usual functions are they easily accessible?</span>
There is room between all the features except the switch is that Cut bass strait and a little short and the use rsistant .

The saw-nitre is effective, although I saw a prfr-meters between each .

However, the knobs of qualiseur are a little too big to be really practical, there is sometimes a little difficult to learn, when our hands are not worthy of a Viking descendant .

<p class="bbcode-cite"> Quote: <span>- The manual is clear and sufficient? ...</span>
Not even look

SOUNDS

<p class="bbcode-cite"> Quote: <span>- The console is transparent?</span>
Yes, the sound is clean. But I met a default on the table: When I put a sound track 1 (assign the crossfader ct A) (all faders bottom), the channel 2 is in place mix (master) when I placed the crossfader (regardless of its rglages except that we must CUT In the rgl compltement ct B, there is always a little bit of sound passes through the left speaker (Same if you lower the fader track 1), and you do not rvez not, it&#39;s a default, you must then either lower the fader for channel 2 or assign the crossfader .

With regard to the sound quality the pure state, I have certainly not the stuff to judge his prowess vritables, nanmoins (and ears in addition to) anything in particular on its

<p class="bbcode-cite"> Quote: <span>- Introduced she breath?</span>
Not only Breath DTECT knob gnre master of breath going up the volume (but it will not be audible with music). For the breath you must place the gain, the knobs and the master of qualiseur bottom, and a breath, but can not reach that level for normal .
<p class="bbcode-cite"> Quote: <span>- The qualiseur is it effective? ...</span>
Yes trs effective, good for Linari the frquences dcoupe are well chosen, impeccable .

OVERALL OPINION

<p class="bbcode-cite"> Quote: <span>- How long have you use it?</span>
More than half an hour.

<p class="bbcode-cite"> Quote: <span>- What is the particular feature you like best and least?</span>
I like it well Fader rgl not too breath and just enough to be able to start rsistant so they stick on their butts in the same top . For lack of it against Linari as the Mackie D.2.

The crossfader is a bit tad too hard to scratch the fury (and I&#39;m still hard in my criticism, but more than enough to scratch the conventional). The SETTING THE race is the srieux: CUT IN, Switch / Fade and Soft / Sharp, enough to have fun, but personally all this does nothing extraordinary. The CUT IN is too sensitive, the rgalge Switch / fade is not useful forcment .

For the pure sratch it has a good behavior, but the Mackie D.2 infrieur for Ractive .

The potentiomtres are of good quality and reliable apparently, they are not anti-gum sheets but keep well in the fingers (smaller than those of qualiseur.

The switch is solid and a little hard, which is an advantage or a default as the case .

Small switches for FX or the slope of the crossfader (Switch / Fade) I got are too small to be handled quickly and intuitively.

The buttons seem PLF against them by the face of lesser quality whole table.

Another big default, it is too sensitive to the level of the sound source:-15dB gain, and no equalizer in the middle to the output level to max on the PC (which is the source), the sound comes from j 0dB on the VU nitre Exceeds see in the orange , Damage to this point.

<p class="bbcode-cite"> Quote: <span>- Have you tried many other models before acqurir?</span>
Ecler SMAC First, Numark SM2 pro, DJM-400, Vestax PMC-280 Pro and Mackie D.2.

<p class="bbcode-cite"> Quote: <span>- How do you report qualitprix?</span>
Trs good for 500 to have a nice 3-way like lbr />
<p class="bbcode-cite"> Quote: <span>- With the exprience, you do again this choice? ...</span>
It has no major default (despite his flight from the level of channel 2), it is stable, powerful, not too CHRE ... It is therefore a good choice for trs many people .

Y asset that must

UTILIZATION

Intuitive

SOUNDS

Trs good sound

OVERALL OPINION

Trs good food, I use it only for the mix, but it seems to rev much for the scratch team (rglage prcis of the curve and the cross fader). super enjoyable to use, flexible fader, fraquences prcises of love ... and then his mouth, large knobs for the A380, good ergonomics, no frills. c true bass cut a little short. otherwise it slams. a little trick is, when used with 2phonos, be used as voix1 and 3 c only those voices that can adjust the fade curve, the two voices has its own level of curve. dsquilibre attention to otherwise.

See data sheet.

UTILIZATION

Gnrale configuration is classic and simple. No need to refer to the manual, any dj will instinctively use it ds THE FIRST seconds. The functions are easily accessible, except the curves SETTING THE faders and crossfader, but as this is not a paramtres we change 15 times per disc, not Gnant. No report about the manual, which is all fawns not useful for a simple table.

SOUNDS

No (bad) surprise of the ct l. Ecler has remaining, so its own trs, trs little breath and qualisation is super effective as usual.

OVERALL OPINION

I possde the table and then a little over a year. Level ergonomics, functionality, ease of use is a real rgal. on the other hand, level reliability is a real disaster! Indeed, three months APRS have bought this table, I refer to dj in Service: 3 potentiomtres (medium + bass track 1 and track 3 medium) hs (gr sills, bad contacts, etc..) 5 / 6 months later was no different! This time, the potentiomtre gain of channel 2 is hs (although I did almost never used this track!). At least that's what I was finding my ct because APRS testing lab at Ecler it s'avrait that not far half of potentiomtres taient been worth as much "end of life" and needed to change (luckily I bnficiais a 2 year warranty). Everything has a table that has only 1 year. It's just shameful. My table is also a Previous Ecler (a Pro20), was 8 years that I have, zero return for Repair Tool, zero problem, a reliability any evidence and besides, it still works well and I dpann NUO3 silent when in repair. It is this unwavering reliability that made me buy the NUO3 eyes closed. It is clear that next time will not have the same. I rflchirai twice before buying a table Ecler. In short, a customer may be lost for Ecler. Everything has to compress the manufacturing cots and make some ends of candles ECONOMY. Honntement, I pay 50 prfr over the purchase, but having the hardware that takes the road with quality components. Note that the problem of reliability are not isolated. I know a lot of people who bought a table in the NUO line (some of my advice for that matter) and ALL have had problem before 2 years of use. Of, the, the.

Deja vu

UTILIZATION

See below

SOUNDS

It amplifies the bass and c is not useful

OVERALL OPINION

It's been over a year that I have this table and I too have had problems with was the way c 3 n which emits more than its right I were a deg. c is also happen to a colleague who also possessed. j I send the table for service they'll keep a ln me and she came back rpar, so I'm happy now and I have not had a single problem with my depuis.c lived with this table. Otherwise level ergonomics and use is is great, I regret not the contrary. the only thing that I miss knob c is a balance for each track but now I m not care even more jy think a true dire.je with scratch and has cross gniale D elsewhere may well grind and assign each track has the reverse etc ...
prior to the day I had the nuo2 that was cool too but I've wanted a real way more (I wanted to put a CD player but I quickly realized that the market for a CD player by Pioneer dfoncer t) .
j have to sell it for almost a TTM 57SL but the price was too much abuse (j have a serato with) is actually no way that I loose it is very good for me, I have added a mini KAOSS PAD that I refer to the 2 track routing since the effects are great.
I love this mixer brief and I will not pass too much if c had to be rebuilt but I repeat the testicle and the return to sav but concretemant 3 of this price path has as many options and there is not no 36 too much choice.

J So I sold the table for the problem of the right lane c is still produced ... level reliability is not a c and J 360 HAK has been a place for scratching. pity I shall have much love take Rane with three votes, but c was really expensive and may not necessarily be better than the HAK ... after I do not know if it will take, I love well.

Dj given

UTILIZATION

A simple config but professional and effective. A table available all and mix well for trs.

SOUNDS

An impeccable sound, APRS say anything more than a year of use, no breath, trs qualiseur a good sound that cuts completely.

OVERALL OPINION

I use this table for over a year, I had no problem (such as what each product is unique).
What I like most: usability, large knobs, faders solid function send / return by very practical. The sound output is really the PCHE and includes evening. Really practical as the headphone jack on it and faade (not for the very latest generation).
I see no "less" by taking micro wrong place but I do not even serve. Too bad there's no filters!
The price is certainly enough lev but the quality is the well suprieure many other table in the same CATEGORY.
I would do without hsiter this choice, and I strongly recommend.

already said (if there google )

UTILIZATION

config is simple yes
nothing to beat the manual! nan I cast a look promised.
functions available, you just know how to use a table, not rocket science.

SOUNDS

* The console is transparent? no she is black matt (ahahaha. ..)

She introduced the breath? unsouffle minimal high volume, like all the table I would say

The equalizer is it effective? Pooh for once I'm disappointed, certe when you put a knob to 0 y 'really nothing but I find that they have no fishing, limits have to do everything to make it BLOCK COGNE REALLY, and it has to knock shit !!!!!!!
else apart from that nothing nasty but ... koi

OVERALL OPINION

disappointed I and 1 month of
The +: faders is really nothing to say that just like butter!
le: bin and as I said above equalizer: NO FISHING ...

yes jai also pro sm2 comes out a sound much more punchy, and I tested those of colleague also xone22, djm 400, xone 42.

Too expensive for my taste, since secondhand nabbed correct for small installations

With experience I will go to A & H +, rane rodec or (better save a little rain lontemp and bought big stuff live!)