Technical specifications explain at length below, I will not return. Just to correct can be a fan of Pioneer that bones tell a little further than the AH Xone: 92 treated the digital again: ben and not at all, but then not really at all.

UTILIZATION

Everything is perfect. In beginners, the pots may be a bit small and closely spaced, but you get in 2 days. The faders are excellent, very double medium INTERESTED.
Not really need to read the manual.
Everything is easily accessible.

Note qu'EFX 500 and AH 92 Xone mnage do not mix (the EFX is unclear grate the system send / return of the console).

The MIDI circuit, even if trs simple, works well.

SOUNDS

The best thing about this mix: the sound. gnreux prcis and at the same time. All frquences promised on paper is the one does not quite shuffled Fawn messy as the competitors MODELS (follow my eyes).

A terrible EHJV output my opinion, comparable Rodec is really apprciable.

OVERALL OPINION

4 months of use only.
It's still a bit expensive, but no regrets. It is a rgal in sound, handling the device.

The filters are really usable live, and give a touch of consecration crativit (my opinion).

Couple, 2 SL 1200, is happiness.
AH thank you.

Edit a year APRS: I stand by everything I said, a rgal. For those who still hsiteraient with a DJM 800, take AH without rflchir ...