All user reviews for the Tapco Sw•10

What characteristics have motivated your choice? For what purpose?

I was torn between this model, the Fostex (I have a pair of PM1) and the M-Audio SBX10. I preferred to take this box is closed. For a bass-reflex model I think you hit the top in quality (so it exceeds the € 1000) for crisp, clear bass.
Curiously there are very few closed cells ...

What amp / What configuration? ...

It is coupled to a pair of Fostex PM1 120W. My HS is currently in a room of 12m ². Previously it was 15m ². It may still change. Either way the power is ample and the crossover channel becomes very handy (especially if a speaker is in a corner)
I use it to monitor my set of machines and for multimedia use.

No hum or it must be 30cm to hear.

SOUNDS

The sound is clear and precise across the spectrum?

The sound is so specific, the advantage of a closed cabinet.

OVERALL OPINION

It's been a good year that I have. I had the opportunity to listen once a Yamaha subwoofer monitoring. Subwoofer stereo, car, closed or open, I know.

We appreciate the two crossovers, despite the very small size of an HP 10 ", a good finish and sufficient power.
Perhaps we regret the absence of bypass.

I bought it used Pilip (previous comment) and I use it every day. It lasts over time and that's good. Otherwise, I would resume almost certainly the same.

I already can from the S8 and the luxury I wanted the full package, so the SW10 was my choice, is the ideal complement to the studio because I use it with synths and percussion rack, it is the ideal for a mix.

SOUNDS

The frequency curve is neutral, but it can be very low round but not "drool" and therefore not all with the s_ provides a listening very confortable.L stereo image is greatly improved and the sound is clear in the box, and everything can be a clear, precise and ynamique more than formidable.

OVERALL OPINION

The S8 for 1 month and 2 days since SW10 What struck me is the small size of it but do not dwell on the size you will be surprised; Actually no, I was attracted by unbeatable value for money of the two products together, I would do my choice.

I have the S5, which naturally have a serious lack in the low frequencies.
I wanted the box of the mark (as adapted to the speaker)

-Use home studio (room, about 18m ²)

-A cross-over channel! useful if one of the two speakers is in a corner for example (with event in the back of lower inflation =)

SOUNDS

- The frequency curve is it neutral? I hope (at the same time to 100 Hz bandwidth!)

- 10 for the stereo! it is superb, we find ourselves truly in a sphere of sound, or sétéreo is respected!

- What a pleasure the good bass! they are sharp, no drooling, without saturation even a high level. Cepandant for mixing should be barely hear (and yes it's stupid but true! If your mix is ​​fucked up) on the other hand for listening pleasure, enjoy!

- That difficult to understand the dynamics with bass ... I would have to test it by cutting my satellite S5

OVERALL OPINION

-Not far from one year of use.

- What I love most: the sound, finish, XLR connectors, this box is a success

- What I like least: the connections in the CAR, it's not pro!

- I never tried other monitoring box (for cons I have heard many boxes Hi-Fi), and it's something else: there is clear and concise!

- With experience, I do it again this election because they save the S5 is a real pleasure to have this box! This is an investment, but changes everything. (But it is expensive audio equipment !!!!! they are lucky it is a passion!)

---> With nice synths, even plug-ins (massive, FM8, Reaktor ... big up to Native instruments): the PIEEEEEEEEEED! will hello!