What technical specifications motivated your choice?

The Linares frquence, the small (despite the weight) and can be easily coupled with the sub.

For what purpose?

Listen to the proximity component Music, recording, mixing and costs daily.

What amp / What configuration? ...

Active Bi-amp config Stereo Near Field.

SOUNDS

The curve frequency drives is it neutral enough?

Super Neutral, trs flat, not like some concurrent dedicates so much listening as the curve (drawn in pink noise and spectrum analyzer)

Stereo image is good?

All of dpend if they are well located mainly in the lower medium (avoid the proximity of corners or walls)

The sound is clear and prcis across the spectrum?

especially in the acute and medium high. For fans of big bass is better link the pair with the sub)

The dynamic is it respect? ...

so small as a high performance level and the signal source is not compressed. No ear fatigue either.

OVERALL OPINION

How long have you use it?

over 3 years (they have not moved a hair despite several dmnagement).

What is the particular feature you like best and least?

the most sound, size, power (sufficient near-field), price (300 -450 per pair).
Cons: weight, not volume rglage dport rglage lack of a perfect adquate
with the piece of cost (although the better places).

Have you tried many other models before acqurir?

Dynaudio (the rolls), gnelec (price exec), KRK (less linear over ddi), M-Audio and other Yam.

How do you report qualitprix?

Trs good.

Exprience with, you will do again this choice? ...

Definitely.