Log in
Log in

or
Create an account

or
Add this product to
  • My former gear
  • My current gear
  • My wishlist
Roland MC-202
Images
1/377

All user reviews of 4/5 for the Roland MC-202

Analog Synth from Roland belonging to the MC series

Not satisfied with those reviews?
Filter
4.4/5
(7 reviews)
57 %
(4 reviews)
43 %
(3 reviews)
Write a user review
Users reviews
  • retroliverretroliver

    Roland MC-202Published on 04/13/04 at 04:41
    (This content has been automatically translated from French)
    Mini mono synth Anloga mid 80's near the 101 sh

    UTILIZATION

    Easy to ACCS for changes in ral time against the squenceur is a real head-taking
    The groove is nice

    SOUNDS

    The synthse is limited but the sound is punchy, fairly round

    OVERALL OPINION

    I used it primarily as a sequencer for analog machines to get an old school groove
    I new fields to search
  • Loul11Loul11

    Roland MC-202Published on 01/18/06 at 10:14
    (This content has been automatically translated from French)
    The controllers are complete and effective connectivity is trs complte Exceeds but a bit today (cv / gate, DIN sync, tape ...).
    MIDI is not original but not install it as I did, well Obviously a difference!
    The sounds that can be drawn are quite simple but well made, the dynamics are as good on most analog.

    UTILIZATION

    Use of squenceur is a disaster if you're used LOGIC or other soft!
    But even comparing hardware sequencers is in fact the programming mode is catastrophic, but it seems that one can CRER tubes techno by typing notes at random!
    The manual is clear and complete, but what a squence To create complexity, makes it the best back up a MIDI and the kit you can enjoy…
    Read more
    The controllers are complete and effective connectivity is trs complte Exceeds but a bit today (cv / gate, DIN sync, tape ...).
    MIDI is not original but not install it as I did, well Obviously a difference!
    The sounds that can be drawn are quite simple but well made, the dynamics are as good on most analog.

    UTILIZATION

    Use of squenceur is a disaster if you're used LOGIC or other soft!
    But even comparing hardware sequencers is in fact the programming mode is catastrophic, but it seems that one can CRER tubes techno by typing notes at random!
    The manual is clear and complete, but what a squence To create complexity, makes it the best back up a MIDI and the kit you can enjoy the quality of synthtiseur and forget squenceur .

    SOUNDS

    The TRS is part of the classic but still enjoyable program.
    The bass is deep and trs leads are fine, so it is complete but less monophonic typ That a TB-303 for example.
    Dja has no effect trs sounds good and thanks to the LFO modulation capabilities, but it's even more funky!

    OVERALL OPINION

    I use this synth for 3 years and 4 months with MIDI and well recess I would advise all users of the team as well.
    For me the synth part is really good and all just trs Funky, however the game is anything but music sequencer and intuitive (I do not like the sequencer TB-303). I m'tonne its always cte as low considering its quality and rarity as only 4000 t pices have built the era ...
    See less
  • ctct

    Good little machine

    Roland MC-202Published on 07/08/11 at 12:57
    (This content has been automatically translated from French)
    Small path that gives very good results in the low!

    UTILIZATION

    Super easy to program or too simplistic. The issue sounds simple is just by the absence of sub menus etc. ....

    SOUNDS

    I am a big electro so yes great but the sounds are basic (sirens etc ...)
    No aftertouch.
    He makes little sounds of some nice organ in September.

    OVERALL OPINION

    I have since the late 95 ... C is expensive for what quo can do but it's still a good analog qd same. C is very close to sh 101 except that it must bypass the sequencer that prevents a good fit noon with the pro solo eg. There are kits shunt, c is a bit boring actually.
    Read more
    Small path that gives very good results in the low!

    UTILIZATION

    Super easy to program or too simplistic. The issue sounds simple is just by the absence of sub menus etc. ....

    SOUNDS

    I am a big electro so yes great but the sounds are basic (sirens etc ...)
    No aftertouch.
    He makes little sounds of some nice organ in September.

    OVERALL OPINION

    I have since the late 95 ... C is expensive for what quo can do but it's still a good analog qd same. C is very close to sh 101 except that it must bypass the sequencer that prevents a good fit noon with the pro solo eg. There are kits shunt, c is a bit boring actually.
    See less