Philips CDR 770

6 years of use and always return!!
Between analog and digital RCA (ditto out).
The cd edition of the text is a bit crontaignante but otherwise it's a good writer.
I noticed that he misses a lot of cd label or brand diffrent that of the device.
beautiful and large blue LCD display faade.
Tlcommande ergonomic.

For story, via an announcer in 2000 sonomag I ordered this product, I had reception expdi burner brand but same-size "mini string" I refuse the package, described a letter to the dealer and dirty softphone.
A fifteen days APRS I reois good writer, nickel.
A week of good prs reception device, a second package I reois the dealer (which I do not open) and looks to see if he rclame, time passes and no r claim.
1 month APRS I open the package and bingo, there was a writer identical to mine.
In the era, the dealer had two shops in France and has priori ml brushes on expditions: that's good for me !!!!!

8 years of use (and a few thousand registered cd ...)
cd and then read more and more often rejetés.on moves slightly in the housing of the drawer and it works oddly after! simple recalibration / cleaning to do?
then with recordable CD "once", always philips or maxell, s burning stops without reason, and the current track etching was automatically deleted! annoying when you do not monitor the unit during the operation. thereafter not to exceed 70 or 75 min of recording on cd pourtant.finalement 80 minutes, the recorder does accepted more than cdrw with finalizers sometimes impossible. given the difficulty in finding these cd, and prices exobitant compared with data cd, I bought second hand that same modéle.hélas, the same symptoms appeared about a few weeks after.
not discouraged by Philips, I have acquired over a 560 and a cdr cdr 775.et 2 years, no pb individuals, except with a series of blank cd patently defective. 2 cdr 770 serve me as a player and therefore sources for these 2 drives.
the technical point of view, I note failesse relative SNR on cdr 560, less dynamic Cdr 775.
thus, Cdr 770 is a good compromise between 2.the digital input records are faithful to the source copied, and analog must be very careful to adjust the recording level if it is high because the blast or saturation appear soon after the type of music (quiet and dynamic) copied.
listed features, I appreciate the CD text, level adjustable recording (unfortunately only in analog), and 2 types of entries numériques.par cons, not to repeat the repeat between 2 points, and the more regrettable For me, a headphone jack variable level (though with a very good sound)
despite the random reliability engraving, capricious reading (especially with the slightest scratch cd), Yes I would do this choice. for proof, I keep preciously well as simple good readers, although that one notch below my precious philips cd723.
AH YES, AS YOU SEE, I AM A FAN OF Phlips (and Marantz) IF YOU DO THE WOULD NOT GUESS

I got it in Christmas 1999. At the time, burn cds was not easy. I like that you can titrate to the plate (even if the computer does not recognize this specificity). I like being away from virus and me having this system that has rendered service while belonging to the world of hi-fi. The value for money of time was difficult.

Repeat the same choice? Without hesitation if I could, but now the computer decided to kill this type of machine. Yet she knows to be effective.
However, a caveat: Unlike the Minidisc technology, we did not have much option on this board CD burner, and only type Audio CDs can be recorded by him, which condemns it a bit. Also, one might have hoped a microphone jack connector and the headphone volume control.