DeeGSA
Note : 8 sur 10
« Ideal for a disco ball! »
Published on 03/08/11 at 23:45I use it to replace the traditional PAR 36 30 W for about a year.
It is much smaller, the beam is more powerful and carries forward (6 degree lens), it does not consume nor hot ....
It remains that the 3W but the beam is bright enough: in the dark, you see the beam with almost no fog!
A disco ball, the beams are sent very clear and much more visible than with a conventional PAR. Rikiki size is a more mobile ...
In short, for less than 40 euro is not bad at all!
It is much smaller, the beam is more powerful and carries forward (6 degree lens), it does not consume nor hot ....
It remains that the 3W but the beam is bright enough: in the dark, you see the beam with almost no fog!
A disco ball, the beams are sent very clear and much more visible than with a conventional PAR. Rikiki size is a more mobile ...
In short, for less than 40 euro is not bad at all!
