View other reviews for this product:
warazor « Wonderful if you know what to expect »
Published on 02/12/11 at 02:38I recently bought the black version, having tested it in the store (on an ipod) just beats the studio (mitigation active cell).
What I noted right away: the beats studio has active attenuation, therefore it requires 2 AAA batteries
the beats pro has passive attenuation (style HD25), no batteries and no active systems present.
To be quick and to the point: these headphones is a really great for music with a "modern, electronic character"
Here, for the rest, go your way (folk, chanson francaise, classic, jazz ... etc.)
Styles "allowed": Pop now, Hip Hop, Rap, Electro etc. ...
The purpose of this monster was clearly to give the impression of live, concert, nightclub, especially in the bass and low end. In this regard they are extremely successful, and to be found nowhere else in the competition.
However, acute highs and medium are not so present. The stereo image is quite staggering!
Otherwise, the studio is cheap beats, and sounds worse than the pro (but keeps the same philosophy)
The beats pro is very very pro-level strength, finishing, and sounds better, and more accurate. Major difference I find: Keeping better medium compared to the studio while keeping a serious yet more precise, more biting.
This headphone has a dual purpose for music that is "modern / electronic" - it is serious fun to listen to every day
- If you have a production in this style it gives you a clear idea of what will give your sound some club. Intractable on the particular mix of serious! So a very interesting listening and more studio monitors.
PS: to try for Rock style, CA is once again giving the impression of being live ...
PS2: do not mess the EQ to your iPod or other, the curve of the headphone is already ultra-typed. On a modern mix, it's really good fit.
PS3 anyway try before you buy. After you are free to choose the pro or studio models, the general idea is the same for all anyway.
What I noted right away: the beats studio has active attenuation, therefore it requires 2 AAA batteries
the beats pro has passive attenuation (style HD25), no batteries and no active systems present.
To be quick and to the point: these headphones is a really great for music with a "modern, electronic character"
Here, for the rest, go your way (folk, chanson francaise, classic, jazz ... etc.)
Styles "allowed": Pop now, Hip Hop, Rap, Electro etc. ...
The purpose of this monster was clearly to give the impression of live, concert, nightclub, especially in the bass and low end. In this regard they are extremely successful, and to be found nowhere else in the competition.
However, acute highs and medium are not so present. The stereo image is quite staggering!
Otherwise, the studio is cheap beats, and sounds worse than the pro (but keeps the same philosophy)
The beats pro is very very pro-level strength, finishing, and sounds better, and more accurate. Major difference I find: Keeping better medium compared to the studio while keeping a serious yet more precise, more biting.
This headphone has a dual purpose for music that is "modern / electronic" - it is serious fun to listen to every day
- If you have a production in this style it gives you a clear idea of what will give your sound some club. Intractable on the particular mix of serious! So a very interesting listening and more studio monitors.
PS: to try for Rock style, CA is once again giving the impression of being live ...
PS2: do not mess the EQ to your iPod or other, the curve of the headphone is already ultra-typed. On a modern mix, it's really good fit.
PS3 anyway try before you buy. After you are free to choose the pro or studio models, the general idea is the same for all anyway.