AïgA
Note : 10 sur 10
« I »
Published on 09/15/11 at 10:38What characteristics have motivated your choice?
bah it came with the x-ponent
GETTING STARTED
The installation is done it without problems?
Have you experienced any incompatibilities?
The general configuration is easy?
The manual is clear and sufficient? ...
RAS!
SUITABILITY/PERFORMANCE
the software is very stable and everything is managed by the x-ponent.
OVERALL OPINION
It's been a year since I use it, and tried traktor and cue. I much prefer Torq, but the tastes and colors can not be discussed here!
I like the general configuration, the option to add vst effects to the tempo and anchors, the ability to add more controllers (eg for samples)
I like less .. skins? they are not very successful ..
with much thought, yes, I would do this choice!
now version 2.0 is available but I have not tried yet ...
bah it came with the x-ponent
GETTING STARTED
The installation is done it without problems?
Have you experienced any incompatibilities?
The general configuration is easy?
The manual is clear and sufficient? ...
RAS!
SUITABILITY/PERFORMANCE
the software is very stable and everything is managed by the x-ponent.
OVERALL OPINION
It's been a year since I use it, and tried traktor and cue. I much prefer Torq, but the tastes and colors can not be discussed here!
I like the general configuration, the option to add vst effects to the tempo and anchors, the ability to add more controllers (eg for samples)
I like less .. skins? they are not very successful ..
with much thought, yes, I would do this choice!
now version 2.0 is available but I have not tried yet ...