Not satisfied with those reviews?
Filter
Our members also liked:
4.8/5(5 reviews)
60 %
20 %
Write a user review
Users reviews
mig-lxyrPublished on 06/11/09 at 00:20 (This content has been automatically translated from French)J have a pl230 for 4 years and honestly I find it super soft especially in relation to price information era al I had the gift has a eClient against inter m m2000 nothing to see who was pushing for more bass bin jbl
otherwise very good acoustic restitution bcp but too expensive j prefers the soft power that largely bcp on and are better now up in price
No I never would resume00- bateuistePublished on 07/08/03 at 07:03 (This content has been automatically translated from French)The cream of amplifiers, super lightweight: 9.5 kg standard damping factor: 500 107dB sensitivity. all of its features is clearly superior to ordinary amplifiers. I test 10 hours in a row background (1050w rms / channel) and it does not heat, just warm. the front just to retire, he can remain in the hands of DJs all without fear for the speakers.
a must.21 - bombasstick(974)Published on 05/01/07 at 10:02 (This content has been automatically translated from French)I use it for 3 years and never a problem
the advantage of this amp is a power decoupling longer need to worry about the legality of the tension. There the switch has three positions for the rise time also it is equipped with an internal filter, the only problem is that it is divided on both channels, a voice is the low end and the other takes relay to the top.
I turned with great amp and is sure he is not at a LAB-GRUPPEN but considering the price there is nothing to say we can torture him he does not flinch
Now I used the amp back as four or tired it takes all its value because of the voice output of the A Speakon 4 points is fed through the inlet A and B ie A input of +1 / -1 and in…Read moreI use it for 3 years and never a problem
the advantage of this amp is a power decoupling longer need to worry about the legality of the tension. There the switch has three positions for the rise time also it is equipped with an internal filter, the only problem is that it is divided on both channels, a voice is the low end and the other takes relay to the top.
I turned with great amp and is sure he is not at a LAB-GRUPPEN but considering the price there is nothing to say we can torture him he does not flinch
Now I used the amp back as four or tired it takes all its value because of the voice output of the A Speakon 4 points is fed through the inlet A and B ie A input of +1 / -1 and input B +2 / -2 So I draw a single line by hp amp and I switch behind the back along the path desired. Indeed the VS15 from home HORTUS you can choose through the switch to switch to either channel Speakon
I recommend it to all those who want to simplify the wiring back LIVE especially time saving for installation and dismantling of the economy excluding cableSee less00 - chte2bPublished on 01/15/06 at 01:09 (This content has been automatically translated from French)I tried for 12 to feed four Turbosound speakers, along with a pl236 for subs.le top .... he did not flinch, barely warm, exceptional performance
a weight / power ratio terrible ..... ideal for the bomb mobile.bref !!!!!!.10 
Yann-LoicLove
Published on 03/09/11 at 06:35 (This content has been automatically translated from French)I use it for over 5 years.
Previously, I had the AudioPhony. Even high end of that mark, the gap is wide ... wide!
I bought this PL224-hand who served in the large rental fleet of a friend among many other brand amplifier. He sold it for the sole reason of his power a bit weak on its use to pass the minimum PL230.
It was 1 year.
Of all that I could have in his hands, he is part of the best.
The sound is precise, clear, even on high speed for several hours after ... it flinch and it does its job.
Some large service line PL2 criticize for its lack of big bass under SUB. This is not fake ... but it is weak alims supplies.
Admittedly, some manufacturers are better but at what cost?
T…Read moreI use it for over 5 years.
Previously, I had the AudioPhony. Even high end of that mark, the gap is wide ... wide!
I bought this PL224-hand who served in the large rental fleet of a friend among many other brand amplifier. He sold it for the sole reason of his power a bit weak on its use to pass the minimum PL230.
It was 1 year.
Of all that I could have in his hands, he is part of the best.
The sound is precise, clear, even on high speed for several hours after ... it flinch and it does its job.
Some large service line PL2 criticize for its lack of big bass under SUB. This is not fake ... but it is weak alims supplies.
Admittedly, some manufacturers are better but at what cost?
The question to ask is whether we want to pay for this lack.
For my part, I'm just very nice to what I provided for my whole Promann.
I also have a small RMX1450: the comparison is made quickly especially on the definition of sound on all frequencies but normal for the price.
Note however that the PL224 is smaller than RMX and 2 times less heavy!
I use one frequently MX1500a: here, the comparison is interesting.
The MX1500 offers less powerful power supply thanks to its traditional low rounder. Equal power, one could say that the MX is better on SUB.
Yes, but more a 10kg amp anyway so ... Again, the utility has you one?
Me, no.
I have already combined with a 230 in active mode: the whole is excellent.
What I like least? I do not think that what is best on the market is much more expensive.
The price / quality ratio is very good, especially new but secondhand.
No SAV for mine. Just the little routine maintenance that any material is supposed to receive. After 6 + years of service: is same as beautiful.
Even the connectors are versatile.
The scope of the Speakon 1 which can be used for 2 channels: I say bravo.
My system is equipped with selectors HORTUS feeding on Speakon, I use one regularly.
I would do this choice because of aillor YES, I want a 236 to get the same value for money with just a higher power for my system.
I hesitated for a better PL3 deemed low but I am informed that loses definition, therefore, I stay on the PL2.
Most therefore the weight, performance, definition, congestion, reliability
See less10