kiwimix
Note : 10 sur 10
Published on 01/04/08 at 06:04
Best value:
Excellent
- How long have you use it?
A few months
- What is the particular feature you like best and least?
+: High power (8 ohms 2x280W for sending more than other brands with same spec), quality of sound (I compared with NAD C352 stereo amp, the QSC silent equivalent in quality even suprieur)
- Body weight but face its many qualities is not an important problem.
- Have you tried many other models before acqurir?
Img Stage Line 850/1100, advice for those hsitant: Take a QSC RMX 350 Used (it's tough) plutt a nine Img 350! Img has less sound quality and EHJV infrieure but remains a reliable and good amp anyway.
- How do you report qualitprix?
Excellent, especially a hand worth the investment.
- With the exprience, you do again this choice? ...
Without a doubt, if I had more I would opt for a sub rmx 1850hd but the 1450 is dj trs well! Now I n'hsiterai more to turn to the QSC.
A few months
- What is the particular feature you like best and least?
+: High power (8 ohms 2x280W for sending more than other brands with same spec), quality of sound (I compared with NAD C352 stereo amp, the QSC silent equivalent in quality even suprieur)
- Body weight but face its many qualities is not an important problem.
- Have you tried many other models before acqurir?
Img Stage Line 850/1100, advice for those hsitant: Take a QSC RMX 350 Used (it's tough) plutt a nine Img 350! Img has less sound quality and EHJV infrieure but remains a reliable and good amp anyway.
- How do you report qualitprix?
Excellent, especially a hand worth the investment.
- With the exprience, you do again this choice? ...
Without a doubt, if I had more I would opt for a sub rmx 1850hd but the 1450 is dj trs well! Now I n'hsiterai more to turn to the QSC.