All user reviews for the QSC RMX 2450

The RMX 2450 is in my opinion the best amp that QSC makes. It is also one of the higher priced models that they have. I remember using this amp back in 2007, we had a few of them for our group because we needed something to push power to our subs and speakers. The RMX 2450 worked great for us at the time. I loved the way it made our bass sound, it made it big and pushed it all the way across the club we were in.
This amp is a 2 channel amps with 2 XLR inputs and 2 outputs. It can be racked and will take up 2 rack spaces. This amp has a nice weight to it, it weighs about 50 pounds. It is made out of heavy material with metal casting. It will last you a long time, if we didn’t sell ours I am 100 percent sure that it would still be holding up and working to this day about 6 years later. This amp is a Class H amp with 2 750 watts at 4 ohms and 2 500 watts at 8 ohms. You will have all of the power you need to push your bass subs to the full potential and get your sound to stay crisp and clean. This amp is very quiet and does not generate any noise while using it but it does get kind of hot if you are using it for long periods of time. We have had ours on for over 10 hours and the top and bottom of this amp would be burning after we are done. But the unit never burnt out on us or anything so it never really cause any concerns. If you want an amp with power and will last you a long time than the RMX 2450 could be the best choice, even though it has been out for years it is still a great amp to have for your set up.

I use this amp for over a month, this is my second amp QSC RMX. I buy it because the other was no longer powerful enough for my speakers (I need two times 500 W RMS into 8 ohms)
These models are extremely robust. These are legacy amp and that is why their price is quite reasonable, and it gives us that advantage because older generation does not mean lower quality, on the contrary, apart from its weight It is full of indisputable advantages: the sound is very satisfying, the components are quality and manufacture of amplifier has the reputation of faithful QSC: Workhorse.

I made this choice already twice, and in this price range I would do without hesitation. But to raise the budget more, it is better to move towards higher models like the PLX.

Here are two benefits that I loose my rmx 2450 due to overheating while n'tait overloaded .. this time it is vraimment hs ...
He has held three times a year by pushing sub 18 "8ohms bridged-mono, sometimes a pair of head 12", other times a pair of heads 15 "but with two pairs of heads 15" is the drama ... clip murderer and a filtering amplifier 50hz, 50hz to re active filter, the receiver has not tennu ... even no protection, court jus live braker DGIG thank you good night, go around, there is nothing more to hear ...
QSC, mark my first "real" love, come to fall into the abyss of my esteem ... Yet I have always taken great care of my stuff, always make sure to leave the limiter on the amp, a rack for the air that he has not to do clipper exec, when the manual it m me assure us of his place in same clip in 4ohms ...
I do not frustrating, can be re-tent I exprience, I need a new amp, but for now I think plutt go home in the Crest Audio CPX SERIES (2600 or 3800 ...)
Cho

- How long have you use it?
for about a year as a receiver of a pair of NEXO PS10. Very powerful, with the clip limiter, even a battery has a cymbal bottom does not make him afraid. Also used in brigde to power a sub with a pro 15 kilomax eminence, good deep bass well
- What is so special that you like most and least?
+ Power reserve, build quality
-Weight (20kg anyway)
- Have you tried many other models before buying it?
YES yamaha Solton the QSC phonic United States but is the best
- How would you rate the quality / price?
I can not get any better I think
- With experience, you do again this choice? ...
Yes quite, although I will turn to for my new subs PLX2

I use it for a year, what happiness!

Most: A potato and a sound of hell, good quality workmanship, complte connector: XLR and screw terminals as inputs, Speakon and screw terminal outputs.
The -: oh it's heavy! (+ 20 kg)

I used the Yamaha amp (less powerful compared notes on their power and less prcis doc), and CREST CROWN (for a quality equivalent to the QSC RMX, you have to pay 1.5 2 times more expensive), the former SERIES QSC PLX (2 times 2 times lighter but more expensive).

The report qualitprix is ​​unbeatable, that's why I bought it.

If I buy an amp, a QSC RMX I Rasht without hsiter (either a 850, a 1450, 1850HD or a 2450)!

I possde 2 since 2000 with a short time leaving APRS (3 of MODELS era).
The bombs are certainly heavy but they never failed the task. They pousss the T252 for a few years. Aujoud'hui they are on a system Eminence. The next evolution of this Systmes should point me to a 5050 and I possde MX3000a is also a great ERRF them.
The report qualitprix and become super interressant over the years (my first when I 7500Frs same cost) but I've never regretted.
Some of potentiomtres problem that "spit" but a small mettoyage deep and it went away.
If not for the record, the first day served a growing medium from the bottom of KF850 in relief. And the surprise was the appointment. Ing of the facade there was seen the fire.
In short, if you prefer a bte to see more often.

I use Ben Deou prs three years bought new 695 euros in France projector shop for those who might be interested that price.
I use them with my pair of speakers and it works nsx tr3 bton.bien my tr3 can suporte but hey more power to buy the same plx gnration must ante up first, but works pretty good the coallition well no worries.
I tried several models but need in. rflchir 50 years because the brand I wanted this but I admit some hesitation with a m inter m2000 because I possess an inter dja m m1000 and I did not know in. the promotion because of my QSC I saw more alantours of 1000 euros and I shut supra enjoyable when my supplier I shared this promo durable so I have no po hsit 50.
I recommend it as an amp of this size that price I say thank you QSC.
With the experience I would do as much without any hsitation except to buy a power or plx soft.NO JOKE OF COURSE I would be a waste of money. I will put 10 put j admits he is quite heavy but good as the rest of the stuff so it stays on FDMA wavelength.

I bought it nine months ago. I use a good vieu United States in 1300 on the sub and I was told it would be nice to replace it even though it still works perfectly. I would not say disappointed!! Pushed too far into 4 ohms, it's heating, low equalized at nothing, that clip ... Finally, it was a bad plan and I reconnect the United States. Not letting me down, I try it on the media instead of the Mackie FRS 1700, it's just as well. On the same frequency I compare it to the crown MT 1200, still disappointed!! result would have been better to put some euros more (barely) to make a PLX.
That said and despite all the pain I have said, it's not a bad amp, I think the amp is versatile and will suit a excelence by many amateur ... But not for me, next time I will make my way to the PLX. It is worth its price but not more and more, the Mackie was a bit cheaper.

I use it for several months.

Yes Bravy a very low-end merdik!

Most: sound quality of course when I'm used to the sound merdik when there is a QSC RMX 2450 is the 518th's change believe me! warmer more péchut less garish! is setting behind the Pro Connection! In any case I can not do a clipper! button on the gain precise feel good the notches.

The less body weight is a flycase with the amp in over this, this, this and that it quickly becomes heavy! I even feel that it is heavier than the subwoofer yet there are only 45 kilos.

Considering the price that I pay I can say is that I am very pleased a good amp for the entry level.

I think Qsc is unstoppable and I intend to keep it a decade or so I remain faithful to the brand so yes!