View other reviews for this product:
Fend.
Published on 10/30/09 at 03:35
Micro dynamic trsrput taken for guitar and vocals. He looks strong and endure low rev high sound pressures. Note the large diaphragm trs!
OVERALL OPINION
<div> I use it mainly on guitar but I made Do not hesitate to use it on the song also. See other sources ... </div>
<div>
I used 2 weeks and REU (import of the United States). He prcises low trs, but held Submitted (perfect in front of the V30), the spectrum is set by plutt equilibrated EXAGRES not a peak in the high-mids that is perfect for the guitar, there is no cooking like "fizzzzzz" as the SM57 in the treble, sounded more natural and smooth. But it is much more open in the treble that Sennheiser E609. The grain is very well transcribed and mug of good potato unlike a 414 amp or even a Royer too smooth (even if trs Fidler). </div>
<div> In short, fairly close to the 57 in mind but without the default that I blame him. </div>
<div> The thing that surprised me most is that it is quite Tolra with positioning, or the 57 mm prt is sensitive to the PR-30 will make the same thing as an it is in front of dme, whether or not dsax ... Ds against it by the death of HP cne means immediately the loss of sharp one would expect. In short, this last point is important to me that trs prfre not take me too the head with the positioning in mm. </div>
OVERALL OPINION
<div> I use it mainly on guitar but I made Do not hesitate to use it on the song also. See other sources ... </div>
<div>
I used 2 weeks and REU (import of the United States). He prcises low trs, but held Submitted (perfect in front of the V30), the spectrum is set by plutt equilibrated EXAGRES not a peak in the high-mids that is perfect for the guitar, there is no cooking like "fizzzzzz" as the SM57 in the treble, sounded more natural and smooth. But it is much more open in the treble that Sennheiser E609. The grain is very well transcribed and mug of good potato unlike a 414 amp or even a Royer too smooth (even if trs Fidler). </div>
<div> In short, fairly close to the 57 in mind but without the default that I blame him. </div>
<div> The thing that surprised me most is that it is quite Tolra with positioning, or the 57 mm prt is sensitive to the PR-30 will make the same thing as an it is in front of dme, whether or not dsax ... Ds against it by the death of HP cne means immediately the loss of sharp one would expect. In short, this last point is important to me that trs prfre not take me too the head with the positioning in mm. </div>