Log in
Log in

or
Create an account

or
Add this product to
  • My former gear
  • My current gear
  • My wishlist
Hohner Blues Blaster
Images
1/41

All user reviews for the Hohner Blues Blaster

Price engine
Classified Ads
Forums
Not satisfied with those reviews?
Filter
3.3/5
(4 reviews)
25 %
(1 review)
25 %
(1 review)
25 %
(1 review)
25 %
(1 review)
Write a user review
Value For Money : Poor
Users reviews
  • o.rosnero.rosner

    perfect for harmonic

    Hohner Blues BlasterPublished on 02/10/13 at 07:23
    (This content has been automatically translated from French)
    micro harmonica

    OVERALL OPINION

    I use it since 1994 without any problems.

    I bought it after hearing a blues harmonica player in a piano bar in Marseille ... I loved it and its 100% pure blues! (Chicago)

    I class in the same category as shure but much cheaper and knob more volume.
    good grip.

    perfect for blues;
  • jod35jod35

    Hohner Blues BlasterPublished on 01/11/04 at 08:49
    (This content has been automatically translated from French)
    Microphone used for the harmonica. Originally it was called the Astatic JT30 hohner and decided to show by equipping it with an XLR connection and volume of a pota.
    Characterized by its ability to rapidly saturate the amplifiers, the old blues sound.

    OVERALL OPINION

    I used it for 2 years on my old Marshall 5010 (which dates from 1978) and the sound was better than my XM Berhinger 8500 (compared to the blues I was looking for)
    Its look is terrible. In fact since I have a tube amp, I find that the sound is not as good ... I much prefer my Berhinger equivalent easily shure 58. If I do not sell, I think I will put the patch can be in the behringer ... to see
    Price / quality rat…
    Read more
    Microphone used for the harmonica. Originally it was called the Astatic JT30 hohner and decided to show by equipping it with an XLR connection and volume of a pota.
    Characterized by its ability to rapidly saturate the amplifiers, the old blues sound.

    OVERALL OPINION

    I used it for 2 years on my old Marshall 5010 (which dates from 1978) and the sound was better than my XM Berhinger 8500 (compared to the blues I was looking for)
    Its look is terrible. In fact since I have a tube amp, I find that the sound is not as good ... I much prefer my Berhinger equivalent easily shure 58. If I do not sell, I think I will put the patch can be in the behringer ... to see
    Price / quality ratio: despite its looks, it is still too expensive for what it is ... to be honest.
    I do not think this is my best purchase ...
    See less
  • FroggyFroggy

    Hohner Blues BlasterPublished on 03/31/04 at 15:07
    (This content has been automatically translated from French)
    The Bluesblaster is a copy of the Astatic JT30VC. This is a microphone that has a cell lment (PM), the team that the Bluesblaster MODEL is a cell called Crystal (PMC151).
    It's a caractrise pchu that values ​​the treble.
    In contrast, the crystal cell are dsagrable inconvnient trs to be fragile just leave the microphone in the sun right in t and the cell is lost. Not that the sound does not happen anymore, but the crystal will inoprant and therefore the color of the sound will Bluesblaster affcte.

    Otherwise, it remains one of the microphones of references to blues harmonica, that said, it's also because of its look, trs U.S. REPRESENTATIVES middle of the 20th sci cle.

    The dimensions…
    Read more
    The Bluesblaster is a copy of the Astatic JT30VC. This is a microphone that has a cell lment (PM), the team that the Bluesblaster MODEL is a cell called Crystal (PMC151).
    It's a caractrise pchu that values ​​the treble.
    In contrast, the crystal cell are dsagrable inconvnient trs to be fragile just leave the microphone in the sun right in t and the cell is lost. Not that the sound does not happen anymore, but the crystal will inoprant and therefore the color of the sound will Bluesblaster affcte.

    Otherwise, it remains one of the microphones of references to blues harmonica, that said, it's also because of its look, trs U.S. REPRESENTATIVES middle of the 20th sci cle.

    The dimensions of the micro Bluesblaster make a easy to handle, including those with small hands. In addition, its weight (500 grams infrieur) makes an asset out of all the microphones "Bullet" (shaped flagship bike).

    OVERALL OPINION

    I use rgulirement 4 years. I prfre in microphone, the look but also omnidirectionnalit of the cell. In addition, the fact that it is a Crystal lment allows me to have a sound pchu, but retaining a saturated sound reproduction and Fidler notes produced. I use it especially with harmonicas serious (low C, Low G. ..)

    The quality price ratio seems to me disproportionate. There are 50 balls in gear, and originally it was a microphone used by Bluesmen (ie blacks) because no one wanted these microphones and did not care that "even a ngre" the rcupre. C'taitun micro $ 12.

    But the voaynt Intrets that such MODELS came in suciter musician, manufacturers took the initiative to drive up prices.

    But the look is indniable.
    With experience, I do not have this micro Rasht. There are now much more efficient micro is more reliable and less fragile and more versatile. A good Shure Beta 57 or 585SAV are true wonders and does not s'altrent time.
    See less
  • sprengloubsprengloub

    Hohner Blues BlasterPublished on 04/16/05 at 23:46
    (This content has been automatically translated from French)
    Hello, I just made the purchase of a blues blaster, used once, it doesn't already over, the price of this product irritating c, t he'll have someone there who could tell me one if you can change the famous Crystal celula (which seems to me very fragile) or give me an address to the OPG, and give me some links with other manufacturer micro harmonized, in order to buy another passion of blues rock, I await your answers, merci.envoyer an email to sprengloub@wanadoo.fr

    OVERALL OPINION

    Used 1 time, then nothing (no shock, it seems very fragile)