mitch
Published on 10/31/08 at 02:12
Small micro gnial!
OVERALL OPINION
I could try it on a rhythm guitar in his clear, it is trs clean, with good prsence in the mix. I usually back the guitars with an AKG C 414 in the studio but live, I Dangle this little trick. Really good. Prcis more than 57. But the o's for me you recording trumpet and flugelhorn. Extra! I did not touch the q. The sound is rich, soft and prcis. Finally enough of the trumpet solo or section. I put on a floor tom as a both a record and it's still better than even 57, especially at the low. on the other hand, for the snare, not better. Even a little worse. is not to transplant a snare is not n'chappe 57.
the 606 is great for congas but also proximity with another micro atmosphere.
In résumé from the 57, the 606 has much more bass and a little more treble as well. A genus of 57 with loudness. It parat also a bit more natural, less color. in return, it does not heat the mdiums 57 is Sennheiser's what. Prcis.
Report quality-price! I'll buy another. or even two.
OVERALL OPINION
I could try it on a rhythm guitar in his clear, it is trs clean, with good prsence in the mix. I usually back the guitars with an AKG C 414 in the studio but live, I Dangle this little trick. Really good. Prcis more than 57. But the o's for me you recording trumpet and flugelhorn. Extra! I did not touch the q. The sound is rich, soft and prcis. Finally enough of the trumpet solo or section. I put on a floor tom as a both a record and it's still better than even 57, especially at the low. on the other hand, for the snare, not better. Even a little worse. is not to transplant a snare is not n'chappe 57.
the 606 is great for congas but also proximity with another micro atmosphere.
In résumé from the 57, the 606 has much more bass and a little more treble as well. A genus of 57 with loudness. It parat also a bit more natural, less color. in return, it does not heat the mdiums 57 is Sennheiser's what. Prcis.
Report quality-price! I'll buy another. or even two.