All user reviews for the The T.bone MB75

I use the microwave to dub duo guitar amp with a broadband static.

OVERALL OPINION

This mic is like a famous tenor: I named the Shure SM57. And what is interesting is that it grows into the likeness of the sound quality!
It is the same bump in the upper midrange that makes the character so popular Shure.
Of course, it is not as good, does not offer the quality of its model of acute or accuracy in the lower spectrum. But it costs three times less ...
This is a really good surprise.
It responds well to different investments to the speaker that allows you to vary the overall color of the recording. And like all good dynamic recovery, he married happily to a static wide membrane.
I tested it on acoustic guitar and it is not doing bad at all.
Here is finally a good microphone to do everything for the guitarist.
I therefore noted "very good" in view of its cheap price.

Copy of Shure SM57, I will not revisit it.

The build quality is good but the microphone below the original, without making toy.

Comes with an XLR cable 9m, but without microphone support. It has almost everything we need to start having fun.

OVERALL OPINION

It features the same qualities in SM57 ... and shortcomings. I use it mainly in the making of his ukulele in this context and no worries. Catches of guitars are a bit more problematic cons: the classic "SM57 effect" is even more pronounced, suddenly the result becomes almost unusable without another outlet with an additional microphone. This is something I criticized the SM57 and is even more obvious here.

In sum ok for a micro that does not want or can afford the original microphone. We can carry around and more or lend with little fear of the result.

Dynamic instrument microphone ... copy of the SM57 indmodable

OVERALL OPINION

Received today, but I know the SM57 (I sing in trsrgulierement ... yes yes!) APRS a blind test SM57 / 75 MB ... There's even when no photo, it is not at ... no bass, little DEFINITIONS ... I'm sure I will find an application I am even convinced that he will do on a snare drum sound for kitsch, but do not expect the exact SM57, only ca r lays absolutely not the same. Cel also seems quite fragile even if two meters it is difficult to distinguish the true copy of! ... still the ring of MB75 seems much more fragile and much of the game, mine was poorly assembled and dvissai (at the screw body) and loosen it that there are s'appercois smudges of glue at the transition from cable "is such a rush"

supplied with a 5m (poor quality pliers K & M "available" without carrying case.

Still to 29 can not ask the moon!

Copy of SM57 ...

Once again congratulations Thomann, there really is little difference with an SM57 ...
On stage there is simply not, I use them to snare (from time to time because I like the beta 57), amps ...

It is really very good ... certe may be a little more fragille but for the price ...

OVERALL OPINION

I have been using for a year ..
Yes I tried the real 57, I 2 beta 57, AKG, well there's no picture this microphone is happening everywhere and the price is unbeatable value for ...

Of course I would do this choice, I have 6 ....

Micro dynamic recovery of instruments (mainly)

copy of the Shure SM57, no doubt about it!

OVERALL OPINION

I could compare it with the SM57 in continuance of electric guitar amp:

From the start even without the sound, the SM57 is better. The T.bone sounding more "flat" and less income (less bass and treble cardboard).
However, after correction, the MB75 is nearing the level of SM57.

However, two points on which the T. Bone is a little behind:
Little lack of definition and sound seem a little less "open" compared to the Shure.

I also notice that the sound is more compressed on the T.bone. This is a mixed blessing because it allows less use of a compressor inlet, but the sound may seem less lively and nuanced. Advantage or disadvantage depending on usage ...

Now, when one weighs the value and the price of the Shure T.bone the T.bone is a good choice if the budget is limited. Indeed, the Shure is still near two and a half times the price of T.bone. So if you want to take a cheap drinking will greatly T. Bone. But if you have more means go for the Shure is a bit better - even if the price difference is not proportional to the gain in quality ...

But on stage, thee would distinguish the difference between the two? Not so sure ...

Micro dynamic "copy of sm57"
It is a microphone that is not bad at all, but much less versatile than the sm57. I think it is aimed more at guitar amplifiers (with distortion), a snare, a percussionist or password yet ...
But for the price, it's true it should not be owned privately and one or two at home, it will be very useful in case of failure of micro, equ a good and go!
As against the major weakness is that it takes much ambient noise ... but with a small gate, we quickly corige ca

OVERALL OPINION

But for the price, it's true it should not be owned privately and one or two at home, it will be very useful in case of failure of micro, equ a good and go!
As against the major weakness is that it takes much ambient noise ... but with a small gate, we quickly corige ca

Copy of the Shure SM57, no switch, the head of the microphone is Swivel (bizare) and quality of the micro-level resistance is a little less than a true SM57.
The microphones and made exclusively for guitars, toms, snares and other saxes ....
but it is intended as was said above, for guitars and saturated. I totally agree with this opinion. the gate must be corrected for the fact that it takes the ambient and can saturate if it is poorly regulated live.

But if it is a micro combined, it is preferred for the snare and made guitars.

Well this microphone and still the most accurate copy which I have seen. so I put him 9 because his model is for me a magical microphone and super versatile.

OVERALL OPINION

I use it for three lives and a recording
The particulatité I like most is that everyone has a sm57 except the price.
The least is that it is still a bit less resistant than a sm57 but still gonna ca.
Question her: this is where the biggest problem.
To make the situation clearer: we must consider both uses, the LIVE and STUDIO.

Live, this microphone really behaves like a SM57 catch guitar and snare drum are the same and with a good EQ is corrected feature of these microphones with a small weakness in the midrange.
Basically to live: it's exactly like a SM57, there is no difference unless you are an engineer confirmed that realizes this problem and will fix this flaw in the media with a good EQ.

For the studio: The problem of media (attention I'm very demanding) makes it less effectively than SM57. For all that, when we work with the abitude an sm57, when one comes across a copy it's hard to accept.

For its value, it is totally unbeatable. € 35 Thomann, it is excellent. I think having this microphone live c cool because if it bites you it's not so bad.
Studio opt for real SM57 only if you have a good mixer with good preamps. a home studio with a Behringer preamp or bored as you will see absolutely no difference with the copy and the real.
We can see the difference with a DM2000 but on a small Behringer Eurorack the eq and preamp are tellements means that the sound seems always the same.

So this microphone is still outstanding and great. Those who claim to expert, instead of spit on him had better know how good EQ to correct its small default but for 35 € including XLR cable should not expect to see madness in his hand context this product is important.
ME I MET HIM 10 because even if a copy is almost the same as the SM57, I would say it is not less but has a different color.
And finally, for someone who has no money for a quality micro panel I think it's by far the best alternative that can be found. especially if you're resourceful you can get much better sound, a sound engineer who claimed the critical landing gear for the incompetent.
Here, the debate is open.

Well, I'm just a pov 'instrumentalist who enjoys a sound decision-making from time to time, but now that I have a real 57 at home, we will be able to judge a little better.

Construction, it is indeed more fragile, more cheap than 57, the grid plastoc just waiting to explode at the slightest touch. For the rest, was worth its price.

For use, I test recovery and resumption amp Snare, well it is a crap about guitars saturated, no other words. It compresses, a crasis is not pretty. I dj a Sennheiser E609 (he is a monster amp for recovery, but why have I sold??) When I bought it and dj j ' had felt good all the little weaknesses. Compared to the original, it is even more glaring.
The 57 was like al be against the railing, close to the HP, the MB75, not at all.

on the other hand I could use it live for a recovery drum, and even when it is TRSA comfortable, even in the remoteness to use CC / Charley, he's damned good taf.

OVERALL OPINION

It's been a few years I have now, except for recovery in Live, he sleeps very nicely in a closet.

For the price, it is convincing trs, on percussion.

Micro dynamic "GP" for instruments: guitar amps, snare ...
Copy of SM57 SHURE

OVERALL OPINION

I've had 2 years. Used to catch his electric guitar (amp) and basically a little acoustic guitar duet with SM57 (a real).

Compared with a SM57 (I), the sound is very close, at least for the tests I conducted (low volume recording). I was surprised by the beast. There is a slight difference in the definition of sound, but frankly it's very honest!
I think it's an excellent value for money. To catch his demanding, it does not necessarily agree, but honestly, I would challenge anyone to tell the difference with a real SM57 in making live sound.