Well, I'm just a pov 'instrumentalist who enjoys a sound decision-making from time to time, but now that I have a real 57 at home, we will be able to judge a little better.

Construction, it is indeed more fragile, more cheap than 57, the grid plastoc just waiting to explode at the slightest touch. For the rest, was worth its price.

For use, I test recovery and resumption amp Snare, well it is a crap about guitars saturated, no other words. It compresses, a crasis is not pretty. I dj a Sennheiser E609 (he is a monster amp for recovery, but why have I sold??) When I bought it and dj j ' had felt good all the little weaknesses. Compared to the original, it is even more glaring.
The 57 was like al be against the railing, close to the HP, the MB75, not at all.

on the other hand I could use it live for a recovery drum, and even when it is TRSA comfortable, even in the remoteness to use CC / Charley, he's damned good taf.

OVERALL OPINION

It's been a few years I have now, except for recovery in Live, he sleeps very nicely in a closet.

For the price, it is convincing trs, on percussion.