View other reviews for this product:
fouineblanche
Published on 07/16/07 at 09:29
Copy of the Shure SM57, no switch, the head of the microphone is Swivel (bizare) and quality of the micro-level resistance is a little less than a true SM57.
The microphones and made exclusively for guitars, toms, snares and other saxes ....
but it is intended as was said above, for guitars and saturated. I totally agree with this opinion. the gate must be corrected for the fact that it takes the ambient and can saturate if it is poorly regulated live.
But if it is a micro combined, it is preferred for the snare and made guitars.
Well this microphone and still the most accurate copy which I have seen. so I put him 9 because his model is for me a magical microphone and super versatile.
OVERALL OPINION
I use it for three lives and a recording
The particulatité I like most is that everyone has a sm57 except the price.
The least is that it is still a bit less resistant than a sm57 but still gonna ca.
Question her: this is where the biggest problem.
To make the situation clearer: we must consider both uses, the LIVE and STUDIO.
Live, this microphone really behaves like a SM57 catch guitar and snare drum are the same and with a good EQ is corrected feature of these microphones with a small weakness in the midrange.
Basically to live: it's exactly like a SM57, there is no difference unless you are an engineer confirmed that realizes this problem and will fix this flaw in the media with a good EQ.
For the studio: The problem of media (attention I'm very demanding) makes it less effectively than SM57. For all that, when we work with the abitude an sm57, when one comes across a copy it's hard to accept.
For its value, it is totally unbeatable. € 35 Thomann, it is excellent. I think having this microphone live c cool because if it bites you it's not so bad.
Studio opt for real SM57 only if you have a good mixer with good preamps. a home studio with a Behringer preamp or bored as you will see absolutely no difference with the copy and the real.
We can see the difference with a DM2000 but on a small Behringer Eurorack the eq and preamp are tellements means that the sound seems always the same.
So this microphone is still outstanding and great. Those who claim to expert, instead of spit on him had better know how good EQ to correct its small default but for 35 € including XLR cable should not expect to see madness in his hand context this product is important.
ME I MET HIM 10 because even if a copy is almost the same as the SM57, I would say it is not less but has a different color.
And finally, for someone who has no money for a quality micro panel I think it's by far the best alternative that can be found. especially if you're resourceful you can get much better sound, a sound engineer who claimed the critical landing gear for the incompetent.
Here, the debate is open.
The microphones and made exclusively for guitars, toms, snares and other saxes ....
but it is intended as was said above, for guitars and saturated. I totally agree with this opinion. the gate must be corrected for the fact that it takes the ambient and can saturate if it is poorly regulated live.
But if it is a micro combined, it is preferred for the snare and made guitars.
Well this microphone and still the most accurate copy which I have seen. so I put him 9 because his model is for me a magical microphone and super versatile.
OVERALL OPINION
I use it for three lives and a recording
The particulatité I like most is that everyone has a sm57 except the price.
The least is that it is still a bit less resistant than a sm57 but still gonna ca.
Question her: this is where the biggest problem.
To make the situation clearer: we must consider both uses, the LIVE and STUDIO.
Live, this microphone really behaves like a SM57 catch guitar and snare drum are the same and with a good EQ is corrected feature of these microphones with a small weakness in the midrange.
Basically to live: it's exactly like a SM57, there is no difference unless you are an engineer confirmed that realizes this problem and will fix this flaw in the media with a good EQ.
For the studio: The problem of media (attention I'm very demanding) makes it less effectively than SM57. For all that, when we work with the abitude an sm57, when one comes across a copy it's hard to accept.
For its value, it is totally unbeatable. € 35 Thomann, it is excellent. I think having this microphone live c cool because if it bites you it's not so bad.
Studio opt for real SM57 only if you have a good mixer with good preamps. a home studio with a Behringer preamp or bored as you will see absolutely no difference with the copy and the real.
We can see the difference with a DM2000 but on a small Behringer Eurorack the eq and preamp are tellements means that the sound seems always the same.
So this microphone is still outstanding and great. Those who claim to expert, instead of spit on him had better know how good EQ to correct its small default but for 35 € including XLR cable should not expect to see madness in his hand context this product is important.
ME I MET HIM 10 because even if a copy is almost the same as the SM57, I would say it is not less but has a different color.
And finally, for someone who has no money for a quality micro panel I think it's by far the best alternative that can be found. especially if you're resourceful you can get much better sound, a sound engineer who claimed the critical landing gear for the incompetent.
Here, the debate is open.