All user reviews for the The T.bone MB85 Beta

Micro Dynamic Thomann is simply a copy of Shure Beta 58 to Beta 85 MB when in reverse.
Bandwidth: 50Hz to 16kHz
Super cardioid
Do not feedback, very good technology and not swtich.
To live it very effectively.
8 / 10 because it is a copy, but almost as good as the real.

OVERALL OPINION

It's been on 3 lives they are used, coupled with a Yamaha DM2000 digital.
It is impressive to say that I also report sees no difference with an sm58. it is not as good as 58beta but titillates the 58 sm see above.
Connecting to the studio is doing is testing it as well as the SM58, but the BETA58 is still more acute in long.

What I like most is the price, AC resistance and quality. thomann purchased and delivered on time, I was happy to see such high quality microphone for only € 39
It's an unbeatable price totally unbeatable.
It literally smashes all Seinheisers E815 E825.
On a micro saw this goal is not worth either € 39 or shure makes a huge profit on these microphones.
at connections and internal weld is normal, c no super quality but it's good.

I try to open mics: both rotten, that huge, the newman through shure Behringers and other ... This micro-level ranks shure. for a copy is a copy outstanding.

Repeat this choice for a microphone song: I think there is no better for this price for the opportunity and again, we find the SM58 for € 50 and in terrible condition ...

I'll keep you in touch on the wear and the evolution of sound as on my other opinions.

Dynamic microphone, all there is more "classic".
systmatiquement do not quote in "copy" of an SM58, it's just a micro diffrent, although quite similar in use.
it has its advantages / inconvnients in different situations and tastes.

if the jet can be SM58 earth 10 times and continue to work, I'm not sr whether the case of t-bone ... but there are singers who do not need a

OVERALL OPINION

Reu 3 days ago:

- Trade-in guitar amp: taken together with the t-bone and SM58 (I would have put them online). The t-bone is much more open, less gnreux mdium down, makes her a drier, sharper, more aggressive may be, but excs. Conversely, the SM58 is deaf may sound warmer, but too loaded in the lower mdium to be placed easily in a mix.
Here, no real preferences, it's about got and use. (Little more for the t-bone that will be easier to mix and little more for shure that "seems" warmer). A mix of both would probably IDAL, and if he had I would keep a t-bone.

- Repeating the voice gain more lv than SM58, and we find the clear and open cot makes default in SM58. Got question again, but a voice that must pass over the instruments, the advantage is clearly in the t-bone. Submitted least mdium down here is a benefit to the balance gnral.
forcment, we will find it more prone to feedback is the best return for opening up the treble, but left to choose, I prfre t-bone again.

review: the price, do not deprive yourself and you have to arrter Whereas the SM58 as THE vocal mic of references, despite the benefits of a.

Tbone MB85 beta thomann, 39, does not feedback (compared to shure sm58's studio which did)

OVERALL OPINION

I beginners in singing (I sing since childhood but I just will integrate a rock band) and I was looking for a micro reasonably priced and effective. I just bought with the advice I've seen here, because I did not want to shure sm58's I test dj studio several times repeated (not that n'tait mine), we did not get along, I did not get along, I did not enjoy singing, and I could not even grate my song.
"Shure SM58, microphone of references in any case, pro or beginners," he DSOL me a lot because it's not what I thought. So I refused to buy the one n'tant not satisfied, particularly having to pay over 100 for beginners ...
I tested the beta Tbone MB85 yesterday at the studio, and the miracle, he not only works well trs, trs sound is clear, and hear me! Finally! (Srieusement comments because I question me about my abilities in song) and repeats it went off without any concern, everyone silent happy, especially me, and I finally took the fun singing, AISIN that more confidence in myself even ...
I would not say that "the Tbone is the best, forget the SM58" I just think that every vote is specially and need a microphone that suits him, the SM58 does not suit me, and as best seen the price ...
I think it's a good report quality price trs, and I recommend it to beginners do not ruin souaitant and be heard with a good tone.
And I would not say either that it is a copy of sm58, it is totally DIFFERENT, absolutely not comparable.
And in regard to the feedback, it does not at all, not even once unlike shure that often happened.
I can not even say anything about his strong I just buy it, but hey, 39 is no big deal.
NB: it is guaranteed for 3 years at Thomann.

The serious
The acute,
The medium
for micro singing are very well represented.
It captures well the present (the punk rock and sometimes it screams and it fills me completely)
Far better than the Shure SM 58, which is a copy /....

OVERALL OPINION

I had a microphone singing urgently.
I really was disappointed with the SM 58 (except a drum, but if necessary) and informing me, I saw that the shure beta 58 was far better than its predecessor. Now playing on hard it's great.
Unable to procure the famous corny instead of money, and watching a lot of opinions on the beta 85 mb t-good. I run.
I do not know the visual / sound of the shure beta 58 I would say that micro is the ultimate in micro chant (c clear to me and I've had two weeks). A little equalization on the table to swing and ...................
I use it in my group and I would use it again in the studio probably in fact I'll take two more ..........
At this price, I would choose this if I'd be rich.
I done an overall score of 9.8 / 10 because I can not put 10 but still .......[/ b]

Micro-edge dynamic copy of sm58.
Nothing new under the sun ...

OVERALL OPINION

Used in singing lessons, on a multiplicity of voices, a sound system plugged in and speakers yamaha emx continental.

The MB85 is happened in their boiboites 2 years ago, full of other models have gone through the same sound, sm58, Sennheiser etc ... etc. ....

And yes, it does, versatile, suitable for any voice, a potato, do not feedback at all is: it is the mielleur sennheiser E825, which costs yet more.

Versatile, a nice sound as clear as the sm58, potato, in short, it's all good.

For that price, I would say that it is frankly not very well-best of my knowledge.

Over time, we see that it is quite fragile, do not mess it is, does not like to stick an alim 'phantom: it is his weak point.

Otherwise, the micro to recommend, for anyone who starts, and for the price, it's nice to have one side.
He heels indeed very easy sm58.

Bravo T bone for once!

I regularly use a Shure SM57 for sound with a trumpet and a flugelhorn in orchestral and jazz variety, I forgot my microphone during a rehearsal and I used the T-Bone MB85 (WHICH it is not designed to cause ...) in troubleshooting;
I was amazed, rendering the high notes, no saturation, crisp, what about the sound, I can play at 50cm. the microphone with his capture as good (or from the time one stays in front), I devote myself more to the hearts and also singing (baritone voice), the same conclusion, has to ask what justifies the difference price with a SM58 or SM57 (certainly the brand), other Shure enthusiasts can "demolish" material, in my case, I adopt it and I recommend it, remains to be seen what will overlook duration, but given the price ask for more ...

OVERALL OPINION

Value for money, nothing to envy to the Shure SM 57 or 58, I would even say that, considering the price, go for this material, you'll get your money. Given the material he looks suspiciously like the SM58, almost identical weight and the solid feel. I have used only three times, but I passed, considering the quality of bass and treble, which are sharp compared with a shure SM57, which is more muffled, I'm not a big technician, but (without boasting) I have a good ear for music and any musician that respect, will soon realize what I mean. Much more than the good stuff for troubleshooting ...

Cardioid dynamic microphone. Copy t-bone of the series shure 58. Listening to it is really very close BETA58A, then set off on this comparison ...

OVERALL OPINION

From the outset we note that the difference is incredibly minimal compared to the original. Only the gain of the microphone is a little bit down compared to the original, but there is talk of only 1 or 2 dBs barely noticeable then. I have found by analyzing the curves of a test on the two pickups in parallel, since I also have a BETA58A 2005. A choice, I would only T-bone, however I took two and I'll recommend two more next month for the resumption of my group of different musicians on stage (with an apparent SCT200 excellent micro as well). The strength we'll see in time, but hey at 40 €, we must break out of 4 anyway to compensate for the price of a single 58a, I have a doubt that it is not profitable in the long term and we do not tend to throw our stuff against the wall, suddenly I do not have too much to worry about.

- Balanced output on XLR.
- Micro stage dynamic.
- Aspect serious and pro
- Excellent sound quality (the colder, less blur in low than a Shure SM58)

OVERALL OPINION

I use it for 3 months.
The specifics I like most are pro appearance and the "natural" that results from a recording.
I tried a number of models before buying: the Shure SM58 and BETA58 and,
Behringer XM8500 on the MB45 and MB85 in the same brand.
The quality / price ratio should be one of the best on the market.
Of course I would do this choice!

Micro-dynamic cardioid
50Hz-17kHz-
-Mainly for singing
-Comes in a plastic housing and a clamp
-Copy of Shure Beta 58 (SM58 corresponds to that of MB85)
- 38
Guarantee 3 years
- 9 / 10 for the clamp from Shure ... But for the price ..

https://www.thomann.de/fr/the_tbone_mb85_beta.htm

OVERALL OPINION

I ran a test with 4 micro aprem this: SM58, Beta 58A, T.bone MB78, MB85 and our beta!
The Shure Beta 58a remains at the top of this classification level quality sound / solid. The sound of Dfine MB78 is normal for a static but more fragile, therefore it is deprecated for our dear singers metallic)! The output level is also more lev .. Feedback Beware! The SM58 is over now! With its quality and some default!

Now come to our star the MB85! And good for 38! This mic is really thundering! Certainly less bass (and blur ..) that the SM58 but the sound is more Dfine. Look a little less robust than Shure but this price rise as a park with an SM58 or Beta 58 (see both!) And the rest in MB85.

PERIOD In a crisis, not hsiter on the purchase of this microphone!

Already said.

OVERALL OPINION

Everything is already said I'm posting this comment to inform you that it has been 2 years since I have one and ... NOT A PET! Yet he saw all the colors (given the price, I decided that he would break after a year and I probably will redeem, or SM58 if I take a break too quickly).

Well I even decided in the end I set my mic swing violently to the ground and he suffered every live (covered with clay, sweat and spit ...) BUT IT TOOK. It still works perfectly, I thought he had ended up having a concern last month, but in fact it was my XLR cable that had just let go.

I bought a Neumann microphone KMS105 for high-end (which I'll take care now), it is much more accurate and its a lot clearer, but I enjoyed it as much t.bone and I hesitate not the resort to mark dates in a smaller more intimate!