View other reviews for this product:
Published on 10/16/09 at 10:01
Value For Money :
Poor
Super simple installation
No incompatibilitbr /> working on version dmo (by registering there has access to 30 days without any restrictions), I did not even need manual
ADQUATION / PERFORMANCE
IMAC dual boot OS X Leopard / Win XP PRO (Sat well on XP PRO cot)
Impeccable software, no problem encountered is good from Samplitude and not as product (I 6Studio Samplitude, Samplitude 10SE and I test Samplitude 16 MS and my soft prfr is ... Version 16)
NOTICE GLOBAL
I discovered Samplitude (pro) by chance there is of it a few years (the sellers swear by Cubase and ProTools LE ...) and owner of Sam6Studio I needed some something more rcent (ASIO Vsti) and Sampro is too expensive for me.
I test all versions of MUSIC studio, and have all abandoned with regret because they all had problems of standards ...
I adopted from the Sonar Version3 until 8 ...
And I have the experience resounds Sam / MS Version 16 this month because there is now a dmo completely open with no restrictions ... AND Lbr />
Discovery <img class="smiley" src="/images/audiofanzine/interface/smileys/icon_mrgreen.gif" alt="mrgreen" />
Hyper complete, rich soft, with excellent virtual instruments, a modern interface, think back, with a superb design dsormais (Carbon), a soft as stable and reliable as Samplitude Pro ...
For 59euros ... How to say? In principle no hesitation ... but I bought Sonar8 there is little ... so I interviewed again and again ... At first when adj considr as an app major, why would you need a soft considr as a minor?
it is that yesterday I started up a test in Sonar8.31 and before leaving my home, I closed the project to reopen after a few hours, BAD SURPRISE: Tracks MIDI is still the virtual instrumentals but also no connection between the two, redo everything from scratch ... ... Ecoeur I spend the same project under SAM 16 ... I close, I open, no worries ...
Not to mention that if during the mix instrumentals Sonar seem monstrous, the listening ... uh how to say? Those Samplitude crvent literally pregnant ... Not all are good but some are standards ...
Goodbye Sonar, Samplitude I dfinitivement password and upgrade to Sam11 in order for a super price reduces
Simple and clear interface, flawless management of plugins, good virtual instruments sold with the pack, a price "ridiculously" low. My choice is made. Samplitude Music Studio 16 and Samplitude 11 without a doubt.
If I had switcher 100% I would opt for OS X Apple Studio 9, not for anything else but for PCs, the series Samplitude, including dsormais version "base", I personally have never seen better.
Magix has normment worked on his product range beginning, bringing a level I think ingalable (for this range). Therefore forget one hand the errors of previous versions, and secondly, not to confuse between price and quality. I had much more expensive apps (3X more expensive 6X) hands, this "small" Samplitude is much better ...
I highly recommend testing Sam MS 16 dmo 30 day, not to Tlcharger virtual instrumentals to test everything. It would be a mistake not to test the ...
No incompatibilitbr /> working on version dmo (by registering there has access to 30 days without any restrictions), I did not even need manual
ADQUATION / PERFORMANCE
IMAC dual boot OS X Leopard / Win XP PRO (Sat well on XP PRO cot)
Impeccable software, no problem encountered is good from Samplitude and not as product (I 6Studio Samplitude, Samplitude 10SE and I test Samplitude 16 MS and my soft prfr is ... Version 16)
NOTICE GLOBAL
I discovered Samplitude (pro) by chance there is of it a few years (the sellers swear by Cubase and ProTools LE ...) and owner of Sam6Studio I needed some something more rcent (ASIO Vsti) and Sampro is too expensive for me.
I test all versions of MUSIC studio, and have all abandoned with regret because they all had problems of standards ...
I adopted from the Sonar Version3 until 8 ...
And I have the experience resounds Sam / MS Version 16 this month because there is now a dmo completely open with no restrictions ... AND Lbr />
Discovery <img class="smiley" src="/images/audiofanzine/interface/smileys/icon_mrgreen.gif" alt="mrgreen" />
Hyper complete, rich soft, with excellent virtual instruments, a modern interface, think back, with a superb design dsormais (Carbon), a soft as stable and reliable as Samplitude Pro ...
For 59euros ... How to say? In principle no hesitation ... but I bought Sonar8 there is little ... so I interviewed again and again ... At first when adj considr as an app major, why would you need a soft considr as a minor?
it is that yesterday I started up a test in Sonar8.31 and before leaving my home, I closed the project to reopen after a few hours, BAD SURPRISE: Tracks MIDI is still the virtual instrumentals but also no connection between the two, redo everything from scratch ... ... Ecoeur I spend the same project under SAM 16 ... I close, I open, no worries ...
Not to mention that if during the mix instrumentals Sonar seem monstrous, the listening ... uh how to say? Those Samplitude crvent literally pregnant ... Not all are good but some are standards ...
Goodbye Sonar, Samplitude I dfinitivement password and upgrade to Sam11 in order for a super price reduces
Simple and clear interface, flawless management of plugins, good virtual instruments sold with the pack, a price "ridiculously" low. My choice is made. Samplitude Music Studio 16 and Samplitude 11 without a doubt.
If I had switcher 100% I would opt for OS X Apple Studio 9, not for anything else but for PCs, the series Samplitude, including dsormais version "base", I personally have never seen better.
Magix has normment worked on his product range beginning, bringing a level I think ingalable (for this range). Therefore forget one hand the errors of previous versions, and secondly, not to confuse between price and quality. I had much more expensive apps (3X more expensive 6X) hands, this "small" Samplitude is much better ...
I highly recommend testing Sam MS 16 dmo 30 day, not to Tlcharger virtual instrumentals to test everything. It would be a mistake not to test the ...