View other reviews for this product:
Nissan Fairlady
Published on 06/05/09 at 07:42
Best value:
Excellent
- What are the effects, types of effects available?
equalizer
- What technology is used? (Analog, digital, tube ...)
bof. Digital J'image
- Are they editable? Via a publisher Mac / PC?
not
- What is the connection? (Audio / MIDI)
RCA Jack
- Is this a rack or rack-mount model?
not
UTILIZATION
- The general configuration is simple?
yes
- Editing of sounds and effects is easy?
yes
- The manual is clear and sufficient? ...
yes
SOUND QUALITY
- Effects are they effective, responsive and realistic enough?
I bought it for a specific purpose, to have better sound in my listening system samson. Resolv 65a and subwoofer. It is a system whose sound is super stiff and hard and it is very difficult to get sexy in mid-bass. I listen to Zique and I watch movies with, it's really not glamorous. So I wanted to paste a table between my eq and mix my system. I did not care a bit whether it is pure quality no time since has not had to spend my mix in, but before listening. I just wanted to add some bass to the sound a bit smoother for samson. Bin that makes him so I'm happy. I put 2 or 3 skeud I like the pots I fiddled until I heard what I wanted to hear, but also a clean shimmer, and I do not touch more. When I mix my charlet instance, I bypass the EQ. It's as if my samson had a loudness button actually. So I put 9 because that's what I was looking for.
- Which instruments do you use?
Zique my, my skeud, my films ... anything out of my table.
- Which ones do you prefer, you hate?
when I do not like a bad equa. When I made a good I keep it. I never touch it again. Except sometimes when I watch an American film and there are too big sub, I fall a little one on the left.
OVERALL OPINION
- For how long have you been using it?
3 months
- What thing do you like most/least about it?
I like the fact he does taf I asked. I do not like the fact that it is ugly and bad light on the whole bill. The pots are particularly cheap and imprecise. For fine tuning it goes, when one goes to extremes it's a little radio Tokai. And here I speak not of mechanics, but many filters.
- Did you try many other models before getting this one?
yes I had the opportunity to meet other equalo on my way.
- What is your opinion about the value for the price?
excellent
- Knowing what you know now, would you make the same choice? ...
I had no choice. I wanted the Samson S-equa but nobody could find me. I fell back on this one. With the experience I would not choose again ^ ^ aside to pay 3 times the price for me a little drunk still, given the use.
Please note, I repeat, I do not serve to mix or fix anything. I put my speakers had a loudness. It is not breathless, he does not lose momentum in my sound, I added some bass where I wanted (grossomodo) but nothing else. that's what I wanted, but I would not call it an equalizer studio not. That said, it changed my life. Again I hear the bass when I listen to Nirvana for example. So my mixes are better. That's where I wanted to come! ^ ^
equalizer
- What technology is used? (Analog, digital, tube ...)
bof. Digital J'image
- Are they editable? Via a publisher Mac / PC?
not
- What is the connection? (Audio / MIDI)
RCA Jack
- Is this a rack or rack-mount model?
not
UTILIZATION
- The general configuration is simple?
yes
- Editing of sounds and effects is easy?
yes
- The manual is clear and sufficient? ...
yes
SOUND QUALITY
- Effects are they effective, responsive and realistic enough?
I bought it for a specific purpose, to have better sound in my listening system samson. Resolv 65a and subwoofer. It is a system whose sound is super stiff and hard and it is very difficult to get sexy in mid-bass. I listen to Zique and I watch movies with, it's really not glamorous. So I wanted to paste a table between my eq and mix my system. I did not care a bit whether it is pure quality no time since has not had to spend my mix in, but before listening. I just wanted to add some bass to the sound a bit smoother for samson. Bin that makes him so I'm happy. I put 2 or 3 skeud I like the pots I fiddled until I heard what I wanted to hear, but also a clean shimmer, and I do not touch more. When I mix my charlet instance, I bypass the EQ. It's as if my samson had a loudness button actually. So I put 9 because that's what I was looking for.
- Which instruments do you use?
Zique my, my skeud, my films ... anything out of my table.
- Which ones do you prefer, you hate?
when I do not like a bad equa. When I made a good I keep it. I never touch it again. Except sometimes when I watch an American film and there are too big sub, I fall a little one on the left.
OVERALL OPINION
- For how long have you been using it?
3 months
- What thing do you like most/least about it?
I like the fact he does taf I asked. I do not like the fact that it is ugly and bad light on the whole bill. The pots are particularly cheap and imprecise. For fine tuning it goes, when one goes to extremes it's a little radio Tokai. And here I speak not of mechanics, but many filters.
- Did you try many other models before getting this one?
yes I had the opportunity to meet other equalo on my way.
- What is your opinion about the value for the price?
excellent
- Knowing what you know now, would you make the same choice? ...
I had no choice. I wanted the Samson S-equa but nobody could find me. I fell back on this one. With the experience I would not choose again ^ ^ aside to pay 3 times the price for me a little drunk still, given the use.
Please note, I repeat, I do not serve to mix or fix anything. I put my speakers had a loudness. It is not breathless, he does not lose momentum in my sound, I added some bass where I wanted (grossomodo) but nothing else. that's what I wanted, but I would not call it an equalizer studio not. That said, it changed my life. Again I hear the bass when I listen to Nirvana for example. So my mixes are better. That's where I wanted to come! ^ ^