efabric « Better than Behringer »
Published on 01/31/12 at 05:01Delay simple:
Duration, number of repetitions, blend
Times very minimal and do not sound terrible repeated. It looks like a cave. If long delays are good.
UTILIZATION
This is not what we do more vintage, but it's far better than delay all-digital multi-effect.
SOUND QUALITY
No leakage in the off position. It looks to be the true Byass.
OVERALL OPINION
Cheap, take little space and sounds great! Money to date the best available.
It should be at the modulations of delay when turning the knob of duration, but it is also the case of analog BBD delays. No problem of clock noise or breath unlike analog delays or tape. No difference in volume between the bypass and the effect engaged. The volume knob is missing in any case unnecessary.
As against the pots are not super accessible or visible once pedalboard. There are well protected against an inadvertent kick.
Duration, number of repetitions, blend
Times very minimal and do not sound terrible repeated. It looks like a cave. If long delays are good.
UTILIZATION
This is not what we do more vintage, but it's far better than delay all-digital multi-effect.
SOUND QUALITY
No leakage in the off position. It looks to be the true Byass.
OVERALL OPINION
Cheap, take little space and sounds great! Money to date the best available.
It should be at the modulations of delay when turning the knob of duration, but it is also the case of analog BBD delays. No problem of clock noise or breath unlike analog delays or tape. No difference in volume between the bypass and the effect engaged. The volume knob is missing in any case unnecessary.
As against the pots are not super accessible or visible once pedalboard. There are well protected against an inadvertent kick.