Log in
Log in

or
Create an account

or
< All Budda Budwah (2010) reviews
Add this product to
  • My former gear
  • My current gear
  • My wishlist
Budda Budwah (2010)
Images
1/50
teppaz teppaz

«  really annoying little click when even »

Published on 03/02/13 at 09:51
Wha a beautiful and distinguished purple skirt and rocker nickel-chromium and carpeted caoutchouc.Lourde stable.Bien normally designed for a foot up.
Feeding easier. Input jacks and output and beefy fermes.Bascule fluid and well balanced ....
A true bypass which really does not seem true, however. Not a problem for me.

UTILIZATION

Only problem: the sofa well annoying. See below

SOUND QUALITY

Wha excellent, balanced sound, never aggressive: music before anything else.
Not perhaps quite acute, some say ... But no ...

OVERALL OPINION

I wha this long enough, and I confirm the criticism that Tina Arkos formula: get the rocker with too much enthusiasm invariably leads to touch her inside the top of the metal switch, despite the thin pad Felt supposed to buffer against this "knock on acceleration." Or he must control his movement every time, but this constraint spoils the pleasure of using the object whose sound qualities (linear change of the signal clean , no noise, no breath, no jerking, no holes, beautiful "whaaaa" wide open but not garish) and the musical balance, however, are remarkable. The simplest solution is to remove switch and replace it after, underneath, topped the threaded portion of a few shims, spacers that will reduce its height and put it out of reach of shock at the end of the race. Some washers but not too much, so still allow engagement of wha forced by pressing the rocker. This is to prevent the use of option ultimate sacrilege and iconoclasm (the trick maso .. Although .. .) hole drilled in the sheet diam.13mm of the rocker to leave the head exceed the limit switch ...
It is surprising that this design flaw apparently minor but actually very annoying, remains on such an object, while for the rest the build quality is very good.
That said, I have the previous version: the default may have been corrected in the new version of Office?