Log in
Log in

or
Create an account

or
Add this product to
  • My former gear
  • My current gear
  • My wishlist
Marantz PM 52
Images
1/3

All user reviews for the Marantz PM 52

Price engine
Classified Ads
Forums
Not satisfied with those reviews?
Filter
5.0/5
(1 reviews)
100 %
(1 review)
Write a user review
Users reviews
  • fils2lumierefils2lumiere

    Marantz PM 52Published on 04/11/10 at 08:48
    (This content has been automatically translated from French)
    amp bought in 1993 soon prs.
    As for the musicality me CRITERIA crucial and aware that it has a price, I had not hesitating the era invest a little more than 3000F (450euros) the era. I don 't shut down on testing of several magazines logieux <span class="skimwords-unlinked">audiophiles.je</span> had it coupled a platinum cd marantz CD42, a turntable marantz sd415 K7. while the gallant 6000F (900euros) is my 2ers salaries of t (j 'tais students yet), I have had to settle for simple speaker jvc spe440 1000f.
    and well despite the cel 2x70w the amplifier has food more than satisfactory, and notched the first months A veritable musical of "mlomane audiophile" I was getting.
    power seemed limit…
    Read more
    amp bought in 1993 soon prs.
    As for the musicality me CRITERIA crucial and aware that it has a price, I had not hesitating the era invest a little more than 3000F (450euros) the era. I don 't shut down on testing of several magazines logieux <span class="skimwords-unlinked">audiophiles.je</span> had it coupled a platinum cd marantz CD42, a turntable marantz sd415 K7. while the gallant 6000F (900euros) is my 2ers salaries of t (j 'tais students yet), I have had to settle for simple speaker jvc spe440 1000f.
    and well despite the cel 2x70w the amplifier has food more than satisfactory, and notched the first months A veritable musical of "mlomane audiophile" I was getting.
    power seemed limitless simply: only the proximity of neighbors bridled my pleasure! But the relative lack of deep bass frustrated me: it is claimed that a T would loundness will appreciate better shake my jvc ....
    this amp has an input, cd, tape, phono (MM or MC) and receiver, the minimum, and 2 hp output binding because they - they should have munimum 8ohms of Impedance utiliss if at the same time . my jvc both 8 ohms precisely, I 've not been able to use jointly jbl then I coveted as 4 ohms.
    rglages bass, treble, balance, but alas no <span class="skimwords-unlinked">loudness.Mais</span> this does is binding only in the event of speakers' low end. "More tape monitor function for the quality controller of the ral recording in <span class="skimwords-unlinked">cours.ET</span> NO REMOTE (a luxury the era).
    for 10 years, it me, therefore, provides much of happiness, until this what a speaker from time to time is more food. He had repeatedly press the speaker button or play slecteur source to temporarily resolve <span class="skimwords-unlinked">pb.UN</span> friend me having said that cell could be rgl by cleaning or replacement of a single piece (I forget what), I gave him the gift of the amp, he is responsible for the OPG. ca t seen a real emotional Dchira the trips that he me but I had given me the silent dj DS 1st time this pb with a pm53, half the price with remote control and loudness. smart!.
    CONCLUSION: my first audiophile investment that will remain forever in my memory.
    Note that the pm53 (bought more than 10 years) 'm also take them to heights of pleasure, and for 2 years that is my father who "has" concerns with 0 reliability issue .
    MARANTZ: the sound quality and reliability that fully justify its good reputable and price competitive Lger multimdia (denon, yamaha eg).
    See less