Guitar pickup humbucker home di Marzio, cramique studs, spacing floyd (regarding the one I). Output level 390mV, acute Middes 4.5 and 6.5 low 7.5. The particularity of this microphone is pronounced in the low mdiums, which is to give a t trs his own notament in distortion, it to improve the clarity of the rhythms and solos. Vai is that this report gives low trs own. The sound is warm but not in the spirit of micro size for the big rock style tone zone, plutt in the sense that the absence of high mdium not only harassed the ears. The output level sufficient lev keeps in mind mtal (t dvelopp it to Sir John Petrucci who frankly does not play the bagpipes). I use this mic for over a year. I installed to replace a tone zone (I got way too serious). My guitar is an ibanez rg prestige 2820. The special steve is a good mic for the trs metal. Trs is clean and warm prcis. But the advantages of this micro became his inconvnients for me: it is so clean that it lacks body nervosa. (For the distortion) The impression he gives is to play a clean sound even when playing on a hi gain channel. This impression is especially true depending on the sound of the amp and guitar. Clearly, however, this is good: the ultimate lens type stereo, almost perfect (the splitter as a condition of almost all the humbucker). I test normment of DiMarzio pickups. It is very well for mtal, but I think its default key is to fail to body and aggressiveness. The report qualitprix? ben o adpend achte it. Some sell the 120 is too much, others sell 80 ... you need to know to look! -) With the exprience ... I would do exactly that choice because it is good trs. It is empty it must be judged according to its hardware, the reasons that I can be me change my own.

Added 25/08/05: APRS prcise comparison with other DiMarzio on the same guitar, I s'avre prfrre steve special. So no change prvu